On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:41:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:54:31PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 13:15 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Tue 21-03-17 14:46:53, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 14:3
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:41:37AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:54:31PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 13:15 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Tue 21-03-17 14:46:53, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 14:3
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:35:32PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 12:12 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:11:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 08:47 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Because if abo
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:35:32PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 12:12 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:11:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 08:47 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Because if abo
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:34:14PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:00:55PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > What filesystems can or cannot easily do obviously differs. Ext4 has a
> > recovery flag set in superblock on RW mount/remount and cleared on
> > umount/RO remount.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:34:14PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:00:55PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > What filesystems can or cannot easily do obviously differs. Ext4 has a
> > recovery flag set in superblock on RW mount/remount and cleared on
> > umount/RO remount.
>
>
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 11:09:48AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'copy_cred':
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1917:6: warning: unused variable 'ret'
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 11:09:48AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'copy_cred':
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1917:6: warning: unused variable 'ret'
Please pull nfsd bugfixes from
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git tags/nfsd-4.11-1
The restriction of NFSv4 to TCP went overboard and also broke the
backchannel; fix. Also some minor refinements to the nfsd
version-setting interface that we'd like to get fixed before release.
--b.
Chuck
Please pull nfsd bugfixes from
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git tags/nfsd-4.11-1
The restriction of NFSv4 to TCP went overboard and also broke the
backchannel; fix. Also some minor refinements to the nfsd
version-setting interface that we'd like to get fixed before release.
--b.
Chuck
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:27:07PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On 29 March 2017 at 23:34, J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wro
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:27:07PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:49 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > On 29 March 2017 at 23:34, J. Bruce Fields
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:27:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > > > Label
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:11:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 08:47 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hum, so are we fine if i_version just changes (increases) for all inodes
> > after a server crash? If I understand its use right, it would mean
> > invalidation of all client's
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:11:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 08:47 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hum, so are we fine if i_version just changes (increases) for all inodes
> > after a server crash? If I understand its use right, it would mean
> > invalidation of all client's
Fine by me, but I'm not sure why you're sending it to us.
Looks at MAINTAINERS
Oh, I see, include/linux/fs.h is under "FILE LOCKING". Hm. Anyway,
this one's probably for Al Viro.
--b.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:13:36PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Drop duplicate header percpu-rwsem.h
Fine by me, but I'm not sure why you're sending it to us.
Looks at MAINTAINERS
Oh, I see, include/linux/fs.h is under "FILE LOCKING". Hm. Anyway,
this one's probably for Al Viro.
--b.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:13:36PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Drop duplicate header percpu-rwsem.h
-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> cannot remotely say that I currently understand how selinux is expected
> to work within NFS mounts, but this change allowed me to fully boot AOSP
> wi
y: Tomeu Vizoso
> Cc: J. Bruce Fields
>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> cannot remotely say that I currently understand how selinux is expected
> to work within NFS mounts, but this change allowed me to fully boot AOSP
> with its rootfs and ramdisk on a single NFS share.
>
>
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:46:53PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 14:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > - It's
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:46:53PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 14:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > - It's
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > - It's durable; the above comparison still works if there were reboots
> > between the two i_version checks.
> > - I don't know how realistic
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > - It's durable; the above comparison still works if there were reboots
> > between the two i_version checks.
> > - I don't know how realistic
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:37:04PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > - NFS doesn't actually require that it increases, but I think it
> > >
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:37:04PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > - NFS doesn't actually require that it increases, but I think it
> > >
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 21-03-17 11:38:49, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Tue 14-03-17 13:18:01, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:41:22PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 21-03-17 11:38:49, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Tue 14-03-17 13:18:01, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Fi
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > - NFS doesn't actually require that it increases, but I think it
> > should. I assume 64 bits means we don't need a discussion of
> >
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:23:24PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 12:30 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > - NFS doesn't actually require that it increases, but I think it
> > should. I assume 64 bits means we don't need a discussion of
> >
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:45:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:43:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > To me, the interesting question is whether this allows us to turn on
> > i_version updates by default on xfs and ext4.
>
> XFS
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:45:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:43:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > To me, the interesting question is whether this allows us to turn on
> > i_version updates by default on xfs and ext4.
>
> XFS
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 14-03-17 13:18:01, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Filip Štědronský wrote:
> > > Besause fanotify requires `struct path`, the event cannot be generated
> > > directly in
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:19:43AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 14-03-17 13:18:01, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Filip Štědronský wrote:
> > > Besause fanotify requires `struct path`, the event cannot be generated
> > > directly in `fsnotify_move` and friends
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 00:45 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > >
> > > Only btrfs, ext4, and xfs implement it for data changes. Because of
> > > this, these filesystems
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:42:04AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-22 at 00:45 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > >
> > > Only btrfs, ext4, and xfs implement it for data changes. Because of
> > > this, these filesystems
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:31:14AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:00:51PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Why aren't the unitX_t types OK here?
>
> unitX_t types are not OK here because no UAPI header defines them,
> include/uapi/linux/types.h defin
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:31:14AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:00:51PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Why aren't the unitX_t types OK here?
>
> unitX_t types are not OK here because no UAPI header defines them,
> include/uapi/linux/types.h defin
Why aren't the unitX_t types OK here?
Anyway, assuming this is right I'll apply for 4.12. (I'm assuming it's
not urgent since this file's always been this way.)
--b.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:12:03AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Include and consistently use types it provides
> to fix the
Why aren't the unitX_t types OK here?
Anyway, assuming this is right I'll apply for 4.12. (I'm assuming it's
not urgent since this file's always been this way.)
--b.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:12:03AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Include and consistently use types it provides
> to fix the
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:53:57PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 18:00 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the inode->i_version
> &g
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:53:57PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 18:00 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the inode->i_version
> &g
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the inode->i_version
> counter, by exploiting the fact that we don't need to increment it
> if no one is looking at it. We can also clean up the code to prepare
> to eventually expose
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:17PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> tl;dr: I think we can greatly reduce the cost of the inode->i_version
> counter, by exploiting the fact that we don't need to increment it
> if no one is looking at it. We can also clean up the code to prepare
> to eventually expose
The patch ordering is a little annoying as I'd like to be able to be
able to verify the implementation at the same time these new interfaces
are added, but, I don't know, I don't have a better idea.
Anyway, various nits:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We already
The patch ordering is a little annoying as I'd like to be able to be
able to verify the implementation at the same time these new interfaces
are added, but, I don't know, I don't have a better idea.
Anyway, various nits:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We already
Call header decoder
svcrdma: Clean up backchannel send header encoding
svcrdma: Remove unused sc_dto_q field
svcrdma: Combine list fields in struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt
svcrdma: Poll CQs in "workqueue" mode
J. Bruce Fields (3):
nfsd: constify nfsd_suppatttrs
Call header decoder
svcrdma: Clean up backchannel send header encoding
svcrdma: Remove unused sc_dto_q field
svcrdma: Combine list fields in struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt
svcrdma: Poll CQs in "workqueue" mode
J. Bruce Fields (3):
nfsd: constify nfsd_suppatttrs
Thanks, applying.--b.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:15:55AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> dprintk already provides a KERN_* prefix; this KERN_INFO just shows up
> as some odd characters in the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2
Thanks, applying.--b.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:15:55AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> dprintk already provides a KERN_* prefix; this KERN_INFO just shows up
> as some odd characters in the output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
been there, so we can wait another week or two to get
this right.
J. Bruce Fields (1):
nfsd: Revert "nfsd: special case truncates some more"
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 97 -
been there, so we can wait another week or two to get
this right.
J. Bruce Fields (1):
nfsd: Revert "nfsd: special case truncates some more"
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 97 -
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:10:11PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 16:52 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:18:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:50 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > > On S
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:10:11PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 16:52 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:18:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:50 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > > On S
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:18:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:50 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:46:23PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Yes, I know the problem. However, I believe most current linux
> > > filesystems no longer
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:18:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 09:50 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:46:23PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Yes, I know the problem. However, I believe most current linux
> > > filesystems no longer
truncates some more
J. Bruce Fields (1):
svcrpc: fix oops in absence of krb5 module
Kinglong Mee (1):
NFSD: Fix a null reference case in find_or_create_lock_stateid()
fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 5 +-
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 19
fs/nfsd/state.h
truncates some more
J. Bruce Fields (1):
svcrpc: fix oops in absence of krb5 module
Kinglong Mee (1):
NFSD: Fix a null reference case in find_or_create_lock_stateid()
fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 5 +-
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 19
fs/nfsd/state.h
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:03:21PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:19:11AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Ja
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:03:21PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:19:11AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Ja
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:25:55PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:50:31PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > >
> >
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:13:47AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:25:55PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:50:31PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > >
> > > There are a number of usermode
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:50:31PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> There are a number of usermode helper binaries that are "hard coded" in
> the kernel today, so mark them as "const" to make it harder for someone
> to change where the variables
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:50:31PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> There are a number of usermode helper binaries that are "hard coded" in
> the kernel today, so mark them as "const" to make it harder for someone
> to change where the variables point to.
>
...
> ---
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 07:57:06PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 02:03:57PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:52:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:39:12PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 07:57:06PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 02:03:57PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:52:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:39:12PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:52:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:39:12PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > If we're going to reject patches that don't implement get_parent (and I
> > think we should), then we should replace "optional but stro
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:52:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:39:12PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > If we're going to reject patches that don't implement get_parent (and I
> > think we should), then we should replace "optional but stro
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:53:31AM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>
>
> > On 03 January 2017 at 23:29 Al Viro wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:30:39PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > > Add standard functions making AFFS work with NFS.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:53:31AM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>
>
> > On 03 January 2017 at 23:29 Al Viro wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:30:39PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > > Add standard functions making AFFS work with NFS.
> > >
> > > Functions based on ext4
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:24:20PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> This is to let bool variable could be correctly displayed in
> big/little endian sysctl procfs. sizeof(bool) is arch dependent,
> proc_dobool should work in all arches.
Did Alexey Debriyan agree that this dealt with his objections?
Also
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:24:20PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> This is to let bool variable could be correctly displayed in
> big/little endian sysctl procfs. sizeof(bool) is arch dependent,
> proc_dobool should work in all arches.
Did Alexey Debriyan agree that this dealt with his objections?
Also
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:29:01PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:23:58PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 01/04/2017 02:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these..
> > >
> > > [ 161.668635] NFS:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:29:01PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:23:58PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 01/04/2017 02:03 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Since upgrading to 4.10-rc2, my nfs server has started printing these..
> > >
> > > [ 161.668635] NFS:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:05:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 29.12.2016 17:59, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > OK, good. So the random nonce is stored with the entry, and the hash
> > you can always recalculate from the filename, so if you return entries
> > in nonce
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:05:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 29.12.2016 17:59, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > OK, good. So the random nonce is stored with the entry, and the hash
> > you can always recalculate from the filename, so if you return entries
> > in nonce
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 05:36:35PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 17:15, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >> On 29.12.2016 16:34, J. Bruce Field
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 05:36:35PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 17:15, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >> On 29.12.2016 16:34, J. Bruce Field
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 16:34, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> That way UBIFS can provide a 64bit readdir() cookie which is required for
> >> NFS3.
> >
> > Sounds good. And if a mat
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 16:34, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> That way UBIFS can provide a 64bit readdir() cookie which is required for
> >> NFS3.
> >
> > Sounds good. And if a mat
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 03:58, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> This is the first step to support proper telldir/seekdir()
> >
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> On 29.12.2016 03:58, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> This is the first step to support proper telldir/seekdir()
> >
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> This is the first step to support proper telldir/seekdir()
> in UBIFS.
> Let's report 64bit cookies in readdir(). The cookie is a combination
> of the entry key plus the double hash value.
Would it be possible to explain what
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:18PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> This is the first step to support proper telldir/seekdir()
> in UBIFS.
> Let's report 64bit cookies in readdir(). The cookie is a combination
> of the entry key plus the double hash value.
Would it be possible to explain what
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:21PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Since we have 64bit readdir cookies and export operations
> we can finally enable NFS export support for UBIFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> fs/ubifs/dir.c | 9 ++---
> fs/ubifs/super.c
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:21PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Since we have 64bit readdir cookies and export operations
> we can finally enable NFS export support for UBIFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> fs/ubifs/dir.c | 9 ++---
> fs/ubifs/super.c | 3 +++
> 2
in xprt_rdma_bc_allocate()
svcrdma: Remove unused variable in rdma_copy_tail()
svcrdma: Break up dprintk format in svc_rdma_accept()
svcrdma: Further clean-up of svc_rdma_get_inv_rkey()
Fabian Frederick (1):
sunrpc: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
J. Bruce Fields (4):
nfsd: clean up supported
in xprt_rdma_bc_allocate()
svcrdma: Remove unused variable in rdma_copy_tail()
svcrdma: Break up dprintk format in svc_rdma_accept()
svcrdma: Further clean-up of svc_rdma_get_inv_rkey()
Fabian Frederick (1):
sunrpc: use DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
J. Bruce Fields (4):
nfsd: clean up supported
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher
> wrote:
> > Normally, deleting a file requires MAY_WRITE access to the parent
> > directory. With richacls, a file may be deleted with MAY_DELETE_CHILD
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher
> wrote:
> > Normally, deleting a file requires MAY_WRITE access to the parent
> > directory. With richacls, a file may be deleted with MAY_DELETE_CHILD
> > access
> > to the
Thanks, applying for 4.10.--b.
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
> ---
> net/sunrpc/svcauth.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c b/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c
Thanks, applying for 4.10.--b.
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
> ---
> net/sunrpc/svcauth.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c b/net/sunrpc/svcauth.c
> index
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:18:31PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Andreas Grünbacher
> > wrote:
> >> 2016-12-06 0:19 GMT+01:00 Andreas Grünbacher
>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:18:31PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Andreas Grünbacher
> > wrote:
> >> 2016-12-06 0:19 GMT+01:00 Andreas Grünbacher
> >> :
> >
> >>> It's not hard to come up with a
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:36:03PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >> Can NFS people comment on this? Where does the nfs4_acl come from?
> >
> > This is the interface the NFS client provi
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:36:03PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >> Can NFS people comment on this? Where does the nfs4_acl come from?
> >
> > This is the interface the NFS client provides for applications
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:28:18AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> [Added a few more CCs]
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Patrick Plagwitz
> wrote:
> > Mounting an overlayfs with an NFSv4 lowerdir and an ext4 upperdir causes
> > copy_up operations, specifically the
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:28:18AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> [Added a few more CCs]
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Patrick Plagwitz
> wrote:
> > Mounting an overlayfs with an NFSv4 lowerdir and an ext4 upperdir causes
> > copy_up operations, specifically the function
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:45:45PM +, David Howells wrote:
> One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> > > (2) Lightweight stat (AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC): Ask for just those details of
> > > interest, and allow a network fs to approximate anything not of
> > >
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:45:45PM +, David Howells wrote:
> One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> > > (2) Lightweight stat (AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC): Ask for just those details of
> > > interest, and allow a network fs to approximate anything not of
> > > interest, without going to the
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:47:24PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> For now I wish we could just like to continue assuming the workqueue
> processes only one item at a time. Do we have that now, or do we need
> to switch to (looking at workqueue.h...) alloc_ordered workqueue()?
Oh, wait,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 02:47:24PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> For now I wish we could just like to continue assuming the workqueue
> processes only one item at a time. Do we have that now, or do we need
> to switch to (looking at workqueue.h...) alloc_ordered workqueue()?
Oh, wait,
501 - 600 of 2741 matches
Mail list logo