On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The trailing everyone@ allow ace can grant permissions to all file
> classes including the owner and group class. Before we can apply the
> other mask to this entry to turn it into an "other class" entry, we need
> to ensure
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The trailing everyone@ allow ace can grant permissions to all file
> classes including the owner and group class. Before we can apply the
> other mask to this entry to turn it into an "other class" entry, we need
> to ensure
)
I think the choices you've made probably make the most sense, they just
wouldn't have been obvious to me. Anyway, so, OK by me:
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields
--b.
>
> --b.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> > ---
> > fs/richacl_base.c
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of
> owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not
> depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group, and no
> inheritance
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of
> owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not
> depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group, and no
> inheritance
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:12:16AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-09-11 23:16 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:05PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * Apply the group file mask
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of
> owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not
> depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group, and no
> inheritance
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of
> owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not
> depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group, and no
> inheritance
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:12:16AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-09-11 23:16 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@fieldses.org>:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:05PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * Apply the
)
I think the choices you've made probably make the most sense, they just
wouldn't have been obvious to me. Anyway, so, OK by me:
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
--b.
>
> --b.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by:
ACK, but assuming Trond takes this one.--b.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Remove unneeded NULL test.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> //
> @@ expression x; @@
> -if (x != NULL)
>
Thanks, applying.--b.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 02:15:15PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Remove unneeded NULL test.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> //
> @@ expression x; @@
> -if (x != NULL) {
>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:45:51AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I'm breaking this piece out of the open file cache work for nfsd to see
> if we can get this piece settled before I re-post the whole set. If this
> looks like a reasonable approach we can sort out how it should be merged
> (either by
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:45:51AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I'm breaking this piece out of the open file cache work for nfsd to see
> if we can get this piece settled before I re-post the whole set. If this
> looks like a reasonable approach we can sort out how it should be merged
> (either by
ACK, but assuming Trond takes this one.--b.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 02:15:07PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Remove unneeded NULL test.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> //
> @@ expression x; @@
> -if (x != NULL)
>
Thanks, applying.--b.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 02:15:15PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Remove unneeded NULL test.
>
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> //
> @@ expression x; @@
> -if (x != NULL) {
>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 06:20:30AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With NFSv3 nfsd will always attempt to send along WCC data to the
> client. This generally involves saving off the in-core inode information
> prior to doing the operation on the given filehandle, and then issuing a
> vfs_getattr to it
gt; includes the requested permissions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields"
> ---
> fs/Makefile | 2 +-
> fs/richacl_inode.c | 147
>
> include/linux/richacl.h |
permissions to the file masks which go
> beyond what the file permission bits can grant (like the
> RICHACE_WRITE_ACL permission). The POSIX.1 standard calls this an
> alternate file access control mechanism. A subsequent chmod() would
> ensure that those permissions are disabled again.
&
delete access to a file itelf.
>
> The MAY_DELETE_SELF permission overrides the sticky directory check.
>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 21 -
> include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed,
permissions to the file masks which go
> beyond what the file permission bits can grant (like the
> RICHACE_WRITE_ACL permission). The POSIX.1 standard calls this an
> alternate file access control mechanism. A subsequent chmod() would
> ensure that those permissions are disabled aga
delete access to a file itelf.
>
> The MAY_DELETE_SELF permission overrides the sticky directory check.
>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 21 -
>
gt; includes the requested permissions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfie...@fieldses.org>
> ---
> fs/Makefile | 2 +-
> fs/richacl_inode.c | 147
> ++
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 06:20:30AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> With NFSv3 nfsd will always attempt to send along WCC data to the
> client. This generally involves saving off the in-core inode information
> prior to doing the operation on the given filehandle, and then issuing a
> vfs_getattr to it
crdma: Fix send_reply() scatter/gather set-up
svcrdma: Clean up svc_rdma_get_reply_array()
svcrdma: Remove svc_rdma_fastreg()
svcrdma: Change maximum server payload back to RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD
J. Bruce Fields (5):
Revert "Documentation: NFS/RDMA: Document separate
crdma: Fix send_reply() scatter/gather set-up
svcrdma: Clean up svc_rdma_get_reply_array()
svcrdma: Remove svc_rdma_fastreg()
svcrdma: Change maximum server payload back to RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD
J. Bruce Fields (5):
Revert "Documentation: NFS/RDMA: Document separate
extended attribute already includes the file masks.
> >
> > Setting an acl also sets the file mode permission bits: they are
> > determined by the file masks; see richacl_masks_to_mode().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbac
the file mode permission bits: they are
> determined by the file masks; see richacl_masks_to_mode().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields
> ---
> fs/richacl_base.c | 156
>
> include/linux/richacl.h |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:06:32PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> 2015-09-02 20:53 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> >> @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static int sb_permission(struct super_block *sb,
> >> struct inode *inode, int mask)
> >> * this, letting us set arbitr
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Richacls distinguish between creating non-directories and directories. To
> support that, add an isdir parameter to may_create(). When checking
> inode_permission() for create permission, pass in an additional
> MAY_CREATE_FILE
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Richacls distinguish between creating non-directories and directories. To
> support that, add an isdir parameter to may_create(). When checking
> inode_permission() for create permission, pass in an additional
> MAY_CREATE_FILE
extended attribute already includes the file masks.
> >
> > Setting an acl also sets the file mode permission bits: they are
> > determined by the file masks; see richacl_masks_to_mode().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com>
> >
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:06:32PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> 2015-09-02 20:53 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@fieldses.org>:
> >> @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static int sb_permission(struct super_block *sb,
> >> struct inode *inode, int mask)
> >>
the file mode permission bits: they are
> determined by the file masks; see richacl_masks_to_mode().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agrue...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/richacl_base.c | 156
> +
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:07PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Doing a chmod() sets the file mode, which includes the file permission
> bits. When a file has a richacl, the permissions that the richacl
> grants need to be limited to what the new file permission bits allow.
>
> This is
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:07PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Doing a chmod() sets the file mode, which includes the file permission
> bits. When a file has a richacl, the permissions that the richacl
> grants need to be limited to what the new file permission bits allow.
>
> This is
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:06:22AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-08-28 23:49 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * We don't care which class the
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:06:22AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-08-28 23:49 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfie...@fieldses.org>:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * We d
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:36:15PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher
> wrote:
> > Normally, deleting a file requires write and execute access to the parent
> > directory. With Richacls, a process with MAY_DELETE_SELF access to a file
> > may
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> A richacl roughly grants a requested access if the NFSv4 acl in the
> richacl grants the requested permissions according to the NFSv4
> permission check algorithm and the file mask that applies to the process
> includes the
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:01PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Normally, deleting a file requires write and execute access to the parent
> directory. With Richacls, a process with MAY_DELETE_SELF access to a file
> may delete the file even without write access to the parent directory.
>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls. The
> test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new
> IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a new
>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
A richacl roughly grants a requested access if the NFSv4 acl in the
richacl grants the requested permissions according to the NFSv4
permission check algorithm and the file mask that applies to the process
includes the
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 02:36:15PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher
andreas.gruenbac...@gmail.com wrote:
Normally, deleting a file requires write and execute access to the parent
directory. With Richacls, a process with MAY_DELETE_SELF access
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
The vfs does not apply the umask for file systems that support acls. The
test used for this used to be called IS_POSIXACL(). Switch to a new
IS_ACL() test to check for either posix acls or richacls instead. Add a new
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 01:53:01PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Normally, deleting a file requires write and execute access to the parent
directory. With Richacls, a process with MAY_DELETE_SELF access to a file
may delete the file even without write access to the parent directory.
To
Thanks, applying, with:
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 83a712e0afef "sunrpc: add some tracepoints around ..."
(let me know if that's not right.)
--b.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:01:33AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> `perf stat -e sunrpc:svc_xprt_do_enqueue true` results in
Thanks, applying, with:
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 83a712e0afef sunrpc: add some tracepoints around ...
(let me know if that's not right.)
--b.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:01:33AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
`perf stat -e sunrpc:svc_xprt_do_enqueue true` results in
e associated backtrace, so people aren't needlessly alarmed.
>
> Also, lets drop the split printk line, since they are grep unfriendly.
OK, applying.--b.
>
> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields"
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs
.
Also, lets drop the split printk line, since they are grep unfriendly.
OK, applying.--b.
Cc: J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
index
en't needlessly alarmed.
> >
> > Also, lets drop the split printk line, since they are grep unfriendly.
> >
> > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields"
> > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4r
or configuration settings in the container.
Given that, lets tone it down a bit and get rid of the WARN severity,
and the associated backtrace, so people aren't needlessly alarmed.
Also, lets drop the split printk line, since they are grep unfriendly.
Cc: J. Bruce Fields bfie
From: "J. Bruce Fields"
Jeff has been doing a lot of development (including much of the
state-locking rewrite just as one example) plus lots of review and other
miscellaneous nfsd work, so let's acknowledge the status quo.
I'll continue to be the one to send regular pull request
From: J. Bruce Fields bfie...@redhat.com
Jeff has been doing a lot of development (including much of the
state-locking rewrite just as one example) plus lots of review and other
miscellaneous nfsd work, so let's acknowledge the status quo.
I'll continue to be the one to send regular pull
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Please pull a few nfsd bugfixes for 4.2 from:
>
> Pulled. However, I wonder if you could start making signed tag pull
> requests. I don't know
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:09 PM, J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org wrote:
Please pull a few nfsd bugfixes for 4.2 from:
Pulled. However, I wonder if you could start making signed tag pull
requests. I don't know how linux
Please pull a few nfsd bugfixes for 4.2 from:
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-4.2
--b.
Jeff Layton (1):
nfsd: do nfs4_check_fh in nfs4_check_file instead of nfs4_check_olstateid
Kinglong Mee (2):
nfsd:
Please pull a few nfsd bugfixes for 4.2 from:
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-4.2
--b.
Jeff Layton (1):
nfsd: do nfs4_check_fh in nfs4_check_file instead of nfs4_check_olstateid
Kinglong Mee (2):
nfsd:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:51AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I think there's something not quite right with the fs/dcache.c
> commit 75a6f82a0d10 ("freeing unlinked file indefinitely delayed").
>
> When running my old tmpfs swapping load (two repetitive make -j20
> kernel builds, one on tmpfs,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:46:51AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
I think there's something not quite right with the fs/dcache.c
commit 75a6f82a0d10 (freeing unlinked file indefinitely delayed).
When running my old tmpfs swapping load (two repetitive make -j20
kernel builds, one on tmpfs, one on
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:35:11PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:35:11PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in:
fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
between commit:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:51:35AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:41:00PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:52:58PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> > > On 2015-07-22 10:09, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > >On W
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:51:35AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:41:00PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:52:58PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-07-22 10:09, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:56:40PM +1000, Dave
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:52:58PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-07-22 10:09, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:56:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:37:21PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Ju
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:56:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:37:21PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:47:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:52:58PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-07-22 10:09, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:56:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:37:21PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:47:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:56:40PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:37:21PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:47:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:47:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Dave Chinner writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:47:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >> Casey Schaufler writes:
> > >> > On 7/15/2015 6:08 PM,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:47:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 07:42:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:47:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Casey Schaufler ca...@schaufler-ca.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 06:45:32AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The following changes since commit b9243b5a5d2da4eb0a54950f4e2d6272863b48be:
>
> Merge branch 'parisc-4.2-1' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux (2015-07-10
> 16:54:37 -0700)
>
> are available
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 06:45:32AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
The following changes since commit b9243b5a5d2da4eb0a54950f4e2d6272863b48be:
Merge branch 'parisc-4.2-1' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux (2015-07-10
16:54:37 -0700)
are available in the
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:30:26AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Valentin-
>
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Valentin Rothberg
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Valentin Rothberg
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Chuck,
> >>
> >> your commit ffe1f0df5862 ("rpcrdma: Merge svcrdma and
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:30:26AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Valentin-
On Jul 6, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Valentin Rothberg valentinrothb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Valentin Rothberg
valentinrothb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chuck,
your commit ffe1f0df5862
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:42:38AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
> the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
> has no remaining links, of course). However, there's one case where that
> does *not*
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:42:38AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
has no remaining links, of course). However, there's one case where that
does *not* happen.
Please pull nfsd changes from
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-4.2
A relatively quiet cycle, with a mix of cleanup and smaller bugfixes.
--b.
Andreas Gruenbacher (4):
nfsd: Disable NFSv2 timestamp workaround for
Please pull nfsd changes from
git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git for-4.2
A relatively quiet cycle, with a mix of cleanup and smaller bugfixes.
--b.
Andreas Gruenbacher (4):
nfsd: Disable NFSv2 timestamp workaround for
Thanks, applying.--b.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:57:52PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> Don't opencode sg_init_one()
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
> ---
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_crypto.c | 8 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
Thanks, applying.--b.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:57:52PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
Don't opencode sg_init_one()
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be
---
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_crypto.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
Applying, thanks.--b.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 06:58:57PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> Use kernel.h macro definition.
>
> Thanks to Julia Lawall for Coccinelle scripting support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4
Applying, thanks.--b.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 06:58:57PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
Use kernel.h macro definition.
Thanks to Julia Lawall for Coccinelle scripting support.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 2
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:58:36AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I noticed that it appears that you have leaked an unsigned debugging
> patch at the top of the nsfd tree today ...
Whoops--thanks for catching that.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:58:36AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
I noticed that it appears that you have leaked an unsigned debugging
patch at the top of the nsfd tree today ...
Whoops--thanks for catching that.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:40PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Add the ACL related protocol definitions which were added in the NFSv4.1
> specifiction.
No harm in taking this now, I guess, I'll queue this one up for 4.2.
--b.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> ---
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:40PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Add the ACL related protocol definitions which were added in the NFSv4.1
specifiction.
No harm in taking this now, I guess, I'll queue this one up for 4.2.
--b.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher agrue...@redhat.com
---
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:33PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The NFSv4 client sends the server GETATTR requests with different sets of
> requested attributes depending on the situation. The requested set of
> attributes is encoded in a bitmap; the server replies with the set of
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> We will decode acls in requests into richacls; those need to be richacl_put()
> at the end of the request instead of kfree()d; this allows the vfs to cache
> them whenever possible.
>
> NOTE: If we allow only a single acl per
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:24:13PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:27PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Create a richacl that corresponds to given file mode permission bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> > ---
> > fs/richacl_compat.c | 38
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:27PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Create a richacl that corresponds to given file mode permission bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
> ---
> fs/richacl_compat.c | 38 ++
> include/linux/richacl.h | 1 +
> 2
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:33PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
The NFSv4 client sends the server GETATTR requests with different sets of
requested attributes depending on the situation. The requested set of
attributes is encoded in a bitmap; the server replies with the set of
attributes
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:27PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Create a richacl that corresponds to given file mode permission bits.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher agr...@kernel.org
---
fs/richacl_compat.c | 38 ++
include/linux/richacl.h |
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:24:13PM -0400, bfields wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:27PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Create a richacl that corresponds to given file mode permission bits.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher agr...@kernel.org
---
fs/richacl_compat.c | 38
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:30PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
We will decode acls in requests into richacls; those need to be richacl_put()
at the end of the request instead of kfree()d; this allows the vfs to cache
them whenever possible.
NOTE: If we allow only a single acl per
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> 2015-05-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > This comment is a little confusing:
> >
> >> + * This
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:25:18PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-05-22 23:08 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:11PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> A richacl grants a requested access if the NFSv4 acl in the richacl
> >> grant
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:25:18PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
2015-05-22 23:08 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:11PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
A richacl grants a requested access if the NFSv4 acl in the richacl
grants the requested
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
Bruce,
2015-05-15 22:51 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:16PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
This comment is a little confusing:
+ * This function does not consider
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:26PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Put all the pieces of the acl transformation puzzle together for
> computing a richacl which has the file masks "applied" so that the
> standard nfsv4 access check algorithm can be used on the richacl.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:04:26PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Put all the pieces of the acl transformation puzzle together for
computing a richacl which has the file masks applied so that the
standard nfsv4 access check algorithm can be used on the richacl.
Signed-off-by: Andreas
901 - 1000 of 2741 matches
Mail list logo
