Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ After applying hot-fixes, I get this: MODPOST vmlinux WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from .text between

Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

2007-03-20 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:36:57 +0100, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux

e1000 oops on boot [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2]

2007-03-07 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ > e1000 gave this on a warm boot: http://belly.cps.unizar.es/~magallon/oops/IMG_1510.JPG Any idea ? -- J.A. Magallon \

e1000 oops on boot [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2]

2007-03-07 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ e1000 gave this on a warm boot: http://belly.cps.unizar.es/~magallon/oops/IMG_1510.JPG Any idea ? -- J.A. Magallon jamagallon()ono!com \

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ > I have another question about i2c... The 'sensors' program gives me a stange message: w83627thf-i2c-9191-290 Can't get adapter name for bus

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:42:40 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:38:23 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:15:24 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:15:24 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:23 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > &

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ > Does this include a fix for the NFS problem ? BTW, I have in my kernel a patch like this below, isn't it needed ? Original thread:

Re: [PATCH] sched: fix idle at tick

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:41:08 +1100, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:02, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:25:36 +1100 Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --- > > > kernel/sched.c |2

Re: [PATCH] sched: fix idle at tick

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:41:08 +1100, Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:02, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:25:36 +1100 Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kernel/sched.c |2 +- 1 file

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ Does this include a fix for the NFS problem ? BTW, I have in my kernel a patch like this below, isn't it needed ? Original thread:

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:15:24 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:23 +0100 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:42:40 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:38:23 +0100 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 01:15:24 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:23 +0100 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm2

2007-03-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 00:44:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm2/ I have another question about i2c... The 'sensors' program gives me a stange message: w83627thf-i2c-9191-290 Can't get adapter name for bus 9191

i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1]

2007-03-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > More things... Yes, this is related to nVidia driver. First of all, I'm not asking for help for a broken closed-source driver. I just want

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1

2007-03-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc2/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > > I'm also

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1

2007-03-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc2/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ I'm also noticing very bad

i2c vs nVidia [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1]

2007-03-05 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ More things... Yes, this is related to nVidia driver. First of all, I'm not asking for help for a broken closed-source driver. I just want Linux to

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1

2007-03-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc2/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ > nfs blocks

Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1

2007-03-04 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:00:26 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc2/2.6.21-rc2-mm1/ nfs blocks shutdown and

Re: list.h , list_head and C++

2007-02-27 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:34:13 -0600, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2:26 pm, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> My C++ program needs an intrusive list, possibly with RCU > >>> capabilities.The data

Re: SMP performance degradation with sysbench

2007-02-27 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:31:29 -0500, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hiro Yoshioka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Hiro Yoshioka wrote: > >>> Howdy, > >>> > >>> MySQL 5.0.26 had some scalability issues and it solved since 5.0.32 > >>>

Re: SMP performance degradation with sysbench

2007-02-27 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:31:29 -0500, Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hiro Yoshioka wrote: Hi, From: Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hiro Yoshioka wrote: Howdy, MySQL 5.0.26 had some scalability issues and it solved since 5.0.32

Re: list.h , list_head and C++

2007-02-27 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:34:13 -0600, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 26, 2:26 pm, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My C++ program needs an intrusive list, possibly with RCU capabilities.The data structurelist_head,

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:30:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, can't reproduce (the bug, that is). > > Actually, the oops you have there is the fourth one, so we might be seeing > downstream effects of oops #1. Can you please capture the first oops > trace? Increasing

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-16 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:30:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope, can't reproduce (the bug, that is). Actually, the oops you have there is the fourth one, so we might be seeing downstream effects of oops #1. Can you please capture the first oops trace? Increasing the log

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:31:42 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100 > "J.A. Magall__n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Temporarily at > > > > > >

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Temporarily at > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Will appear later at > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ > > Oops plague for me :(. A

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.20-mm1/ Will appear later at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm1/ Oops plague for me :(. A lot like

Re: 2.6.20-mm1

2007-02-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:31:42 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:30:17 +0100 J.A. Magall__n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:14:08 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Temporarily at

Re: [PATCH] Re: Bio device too big | kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:537!

2007-02-12 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:26:56 +1100, Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > This patch should fix the worst of the offences, but I'd like to > > experiment and think a bit more before I submit it to stable. > > And probably test it too - as

Re: [PATCH] Re: Bio device too big | kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:537!

2007-02-12 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:26:56 +1100, Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday February 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch should fix the worst of the offences, but I'd like to experiment and think a bit more before I submit it to stable. And probably test it too - as yet I have

Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

2007-02-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:03:06 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > But THE CALLER CANNOT AND MUST NOT CARE! Because the sign of "char" is > > implementation-defined, so if you call "strcmp()", you are already > >

Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

2007-02-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:53:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > I generally have to agree with you about the unsigned char* vs char*. It > > is a problem of the C language that char can be signed and unsigned, and >

Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

2007-02-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:53:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: I generally have to agree with you about the unsigned char* vs char*. It is a problem of the C language that char can be signed and unsigned, and that

Re: somebody dropped a (warning) bomb

2007-02-08 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 14:03:06 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: But THE CALLER CANNOT AND MUST NOT CARE! Because the sign of char is implementation-defined, so if you call strcmp(), you are already basically saying: I

Re: Problem with POSIX threads in latest kernel...

2007-01-22 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:56:30 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:47:10 +0100 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Hi... > > > > I run the (almost) latest -mm kernel (2.6.20-rc3-mm1), and se

Re: Problem with POSIX threads in latest kernel...

2007-01-22 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:56:30 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:47:10 +0100 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi... I run the (almost) latest -mm kernel (2.6.20-rc3-mm1), and see some strange behaviour with POSIX threads (glibc-2.4). I

Re: Threading...

2007-01-19 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:55:41 +0100, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 10:43 -0800, Brian McGrew wrote: > > I have a very interesting question about something that we're seeing > > happening with threading between Fedora Core 3 and Fedora Core 5. Running > > on

Re: Threading...

2007-01-19 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:55:41 +0100, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 10:43 -0800, Brian McGrew wrote: I have a very interesting question about something that we're seeing happening with threading between Fedora Core 3 and Fedora Core 5. Running on Dell

Problem with POSIX threads in latest kernel...

2007-01-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi... I run the (almost) latest -mm kernel (2.6.20-rc3-mm1), and see some strange behaviour with POSIX threads (glibc-2.4). I have downgraded my test to a simple textboox example for a SMP-safe spool queue, it's just a circular queue with a mutex and a condition variable for in and out. I have

Problem with POSIX threads in latest kernel...

2007-01-15 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi... I run the (almost) latest -mm kernel (2.6.20-rc3-mm1), and see some strange behaviour with POSIX threads (glibc-2.4). I have downgraded my test to a simple textboox example for a SMP-safe spool queue, it's just a circular queue with a mutex and a condition variable for in and out. I have

Re: macros: "do-while" versus "({ })" and a compile-time error

2007-01-10 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:55 -0500, "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > > > >> > >> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote: > >> > >>> Robert P. J. Day wrote: >

Re: macros: do-while versus ({ }) and a compile-time error

2007-01-10 Thread J.A. Magallón
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:16:55 -0500, linux-os \(Dick Johnson\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote: Robert P. J. Day wrote: just to stir the pot a bit

Question on ALSA intel8x0

2007-01-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi... I have a curious issue with snd_intel8x0 ALSA driver: Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:1f.5 disabled Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 21 Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: PCI:

Question on ALSA intel8x0

2007-01-06 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi... I have a curious issue with snd_intel8x0 ALSA driver: Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:1f.5 disabled Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.5[B] - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 21 Jan 7 01:14:27 werewolf-wl kernel: PCI:

oprofile as user

2006-11-28 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi First of all, thanks for oprofile ! It's the first tool I can really use to profile my app, with a ton of dynamically loaded plugins and without having to link everything statically... But, it there any sane way to use it as non-root user ? Is there any alternative ? I'm even thinking of

oprofile as user

2006-11-28 Thread J.A. Magallón
Hi First of all, thanks for oprofile ! It's the first tool I can really use to profile my app, with a ton of dynamically loaded plugins and without having to link everything statically... But, it there any sane way to use it as non-root user ? Is there any alternative ? I'm even thinking of

<    1   2