Am Donnerstag, 13. August 2015, 00:37:05 schrieb David Woodhouse:
> On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 01:17 +0200, Jan-Simon Moeller wrote:
> > This way we can figure why it does not work for clang and keep things
> > as-is for gcc.
>
> Let's figure it out first. Or at *least* bi
Am Mittwoch, 12. August 2015, 15:37:05 schrieb H. Peter Anvin:
> NAK. This is crazy.
Ok roger that. What about the cc-option at least?
This way we can figure why it does not work for clang and keep things as-is
for gcc.
JS
> On August 12, 2015 3:30:19 PM PDT, Jan-Simon Moeller
Hi all!
> You could mention that this is to fix the clang build. But why is it
> needed? It isn't that clang just doesn't accept the option, is it?
> Otherwise we could just use $(call cc-option, -falign-jumps=1) etc.
Yes it is to fix the build with clang.
I tried cc-option, but it does not impr
3 matches
Mail list logo
