On 03/16/2017 03:48 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:11:48 +0800 Jane Li wrote:
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
---
Since v2:
- use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
Since v1:
On 03/16/2017 03:48 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:11:48 +0800 Jane Li wrote:
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
---
Since v2:
- use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com>
---
Since v3:
- check clk_bus before enabling it during resume
Since v2:
- use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
Sin
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
Reviewed-by: Jisheng Zhang
---
Since v3:
- check clk_bus before enabling it during resume
Since v2:
- use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows
On 03/16/2017 11:37 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:19:10 +0800 Jane Li wrote:
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
---
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows() and mvneta_bm_port_init() in mvneta_resume()
d
On 03/16/2017 11:37 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:19:10 +0800 Jane Li wrote:
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
---
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows() and mvneta_bm_port_init() in mvneta_resume()
drivers/net/ethernet
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
---
Since v2:
- use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows() and mvneta_bm_port_init() in mvneta_resume()
drivers/net/ethernet/m
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
---
Since v2:
- use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS instead of SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows() and mvneta_bm_port_init() in mvneta_resume()
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 60
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
---
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows() and mvneta_bm_port_init() in mvneta_resume()
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 62 ---
1 file changed, 58 inse
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
---
Since v1:
- add mvneta_conf_mbus_windows() and mvneta_bm_port_init() in mvneta_resume()
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 62 ---
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 4 deletions
Hi Jisheng,
On 2017年03月15日 15:18, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Hi Jane,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:08:34 +0800 Jane Li wrote:
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.
Hi Jisheng,
On 2017年03月15日 15:18, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Hi Jane,
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:08:34 +0800 Jane Li wrote:
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 44 +++
1 file
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li <j...@marvell.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 44 +++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/m
Add basic support for handling suspend and resume.
Signed-off-by: Jane Li
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 44 +++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index
On 03/19/2014 06:00 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 19-03-14 11:08:08, Jane Li wrote:
>> On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:50:00 +0800 wrote:
> Umm, I disagree with the patch. What I proposed in my answer to your patch
> is someth
On 03/19/2014 06:00 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 19-03-14 11:08:08, Jane Li wrote:
On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:50:00 +0800j...@marvell.com wrote:
Umm, I disagree with the patch. What I proposed in my answer to your patch
is something like the patch
On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:50:00 +0800 wrote:
From: Jane Li
This patch tries to fix a warning about possible circular locking
dependency.
If do in following sequence:
enter suspend -> resume -> plug-out CPUx (echo 0 > cpux/online
On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:50:00 +0800j...@marvell.com wrote:
From: Jane Lij...@marvell.com
This patch tries to fix a warning about possible circular locking
dependency.
If do in following sequence:
enter suspend - resume - plug-out CPUx
On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
There are three locks involved in two sequence:
a) pm suspend:
console_lock (@suspend_console())
cpu_add_remove_lock (@disable_nonboot_cpus())
cpu_hotplug.lock (@_cpu_down())
But but but. suspend_console() releases
On 02/12/2014 05:19 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
There are three locks involved in two sequence:
a) pm suspend:
console_lock (@suspend_console())
cpu_add_remove_lock (@disable_nonboot_cpus())
cpu_hotplug.lock (@_cpu_down())
But but but. suspend_console() releases
On 02/09/2014 11:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Adding many more people and lkml to the cc list. Please don't poke people
in private, but always cc a relevant mailing list.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Jane Li wrote:
Hi Danial Vetter,
I found you had added console_lock_dep_map in commit
On 02/09/2014 11:45 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Adding many more people and lkml to the cc list. Please don't poke people
in private, but always cc a relevant mailing list.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Jane Li j...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi Danial Vetter,
I found you had added
On 01/03/2014 02:50 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3 January 2014 12:14, wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index dc196bb..15c62df 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct
On 01/03/2014 02:50 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3 January 2014 12:14, j...@marvell.com wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index dc196bb..15c62df 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ int
On 01/03/2014 07:26 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote
Unlocking in different branches is not the best practice IMO, I'd
recommend doing:
mutex_lock(_governor_lock);
if (!policy->governor_enabled)
goto out_unlock;
...
out_unlock:
On 01/03/2014 07:26 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote
Unlocking in different branches is not the best practice IMO, I'd
recommend doing:
mutex_lock(cpufreq_governor_lock);
if (!policy-governor_enabled)
goto out_unlock;
...
out_unlock:
Yes, I test it. After adding cpufreq_governor_lock in gov_queue_work() and
running same test, there is no debugobjects warning.
But it really can't work at all.. There should be a separate copy of lock
in every file that includes cpufreq.h.. And so this shouldn't have worked.
Oh.. I understand
Yes, I test it. After adding cpufreq_governor_lock in gov_queue_work() and
running same test, there is no debugobjects warning.
But it really can't work at all.. There should be a separate copy of lock
in every file that includes cpufreq.h.. And so this shouldn't have worked.
Oh.. I understand
On 12/27/2013 05:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 27 December 2013 15:00, wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index dc196bb..4faafe7 100644
---
On 12/27/2013 05:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 27 December 2013 15:00, j...@marvell.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index dc196bb..4faafe7
30 matches
Mail list logo
