Hello folks,
Access to /proc//maps is now restricted to legitimate users, but
read(2) simply returns 0 instead of a more explicit error. The patch below
fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Marc Saffroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: linux-2.6.24.2/fs/proc/
sx.fsxgood contains what fsx expected to be in test_fsx;
the files differ only in the last 4K chunk (it seems there should be only
zeroes, but it's not so).
There does not seem to be any problem with ext3.
Can anyone else confirm this problem?
Cheers,
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Silicomp /
ce of meaning between these two ?
Regards,
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://
lt_idle, and the CPU in smp_call_function() loops forever in:
while (atomic_read(&data.started) != cpus)
barrier();
So I guess that there is some sort of race condition, but I don't know
where. Any idea ?
Regards,
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp
t SMP support on these machines has no problem.
Can anyone reproduce this ? Or maybe it has already been fixed ?
Regards,
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel
get it. Thanks for this much clearer explanation.
I guess that this was not a problem in 2.2 precisely because hard links on
directories were forbidden, right ?
> Besides, we clearly violated
> all relevant standards - rmdir() and rename() are required to fail
> if the last component of
nyway. Now if rmdir "." is
forbidden, then I think rmdir `pwd` should fail as well. Or am I missing
something ?
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker
ed as well, the current one
states :
EBUSY pathname is the current working directory or root
directory of some process.
Maybe rmdir should return EBUSY only when trying to remove a mount point ?
Regards,
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Instit
Too bad, I was already away for the weekend. Anyway, here is a dmesg from
a fresh test8 kernel that now boots without any manual patch. :-) As the
dump shows, no IRQ seems to be generated by the XPRESS bus on this
machine. Let me know if you want me to perform additional tests/dumps on
this system
a small patch that we believe should be integrated to further kernel
releases (BTW it also contains minor cosmetic fixes).
Regards,
JMS
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/**/
diff -ru linux-2.4.0-test7/arch/i38
10 matches
Mail list logo