[PATCH] return useful error when accessing /proc//maps

2008-02-17 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
Hello folks, Access to /proc//maps is now restricted to legitimate users, but read(2) simply returns 0 instead of a more explicit error. The patch below fixes this. Signed-off-by: Jean-Marc Saffroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Index: linux-2.6.24.2/fs/proc/

fsx failure on ufs2

2007-12-14 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
sx.fsxgood contains what fsx expected to be in test_fsx; the files differ only in the last 4K chunk (it seems there should be only zeroes, but it's not so). There does not seem to be any problem with ext3. Can anyone else confirm this problem? Cheers, -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Silicomp /

[Q] [VFS] i_mapping vs. i_data ?

2001-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
ce of meaning between these two ? Regards, -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://

Re: [BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt

2001-01-18 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
lt_idle, and the CPU in smp_call_function() loops forever in: while (atomic_read(&data.started) != cpus) barrier(); So I guess that there is some sort of race condition, but I don't know where. Any idea ? Regards, -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp

[BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
t SMP support on these machines has no problem. Can anyone reproduce this ? Or maybe it has already been fixed ? Regards, -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel

Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir

2000-11-16 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
get it. Thanks for this much clearer explanation. I guess that this was not a problem in 2.2 precisely because hard links on directories were forbidden, right ? > Besides, we clearly violated > all relevant standards - rmdir() and rename() are required to fail > if the last component of

Re: [BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir

2000-11-16 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
nyway. Now if rmdir "." is forbidden, then I think rmdir `pwd` should fail as well. Or am I missing something ? -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker

[BUG] Inconsistent behaviour of rmdir

2000-11-16 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
ed as well, the current one states : EBUSY pathname is the current working directory or root directory of some process. Maybe rmdir should return EBUSY only when trying to remove a mount point ? Regards, -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Instit

Re: [PATCH] panic when booting Intel XXPRESS SMP boards

2000-09-11 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
Too bad, I was already away for the weekend. Anyway, here is a dmesg from a fresh test8 kernel that now boots without any manual patch. :-) As the dump shows, no IRQ seems to be generated by the XPRESS bus on this machine. Let me know if you want me to perform additional tests/dumps on this system

[PATCH] panic when booting Intel XXPRESS SMP boards

2000-09-08 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
a small patch that we believe should be integrated to further kernel releases (BTW it also contains minor cosmetic fixes). Regards, JMS -- Jean-Marc Saffroy - Research Engineer - Silicomp Research Institute mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] /**/ diff -ru linux-2.4.0-test7/arch/i38