On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:12 PM Jeffrin Jose T
wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i have worked on to fix depreciated api issue from
> tools/testing/selftests/intel_pstate/aerf.c
>
> i met with the following error related...
>
> --x--x->
> $pwd
>
hello,
Compiled and booted 5.8.17-rc1+.
Looks like no typical regression or regressions.
Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:23 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.8.17 release.
> There are 633 patches in this series, all
hello ,
compiled and booted 4.14.203-rc1+ .
dmesg atleast throws issue or issues.
-x--x--x---x-
[1.822459] ACPI Error: [_SB_.PCI0.RP05.PXSX] Namespace lookup
failure, AE_NOT_FOUND
hello Kees,
please mention me ...
Reported-by: Jeffrin Jose T
Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:25 AM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 7/29/19 1:34 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
> > hello Kees Cook,
> >
> > i tested your fix and i think it worked
19 at 11:28:29AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:44 AM Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > hello all ,
> > >
> > > i encountered a KASAN bug related .here are some related
> > > informatio
hello Jens Axboe,
Please can you take a look at related code and also patch from Kees ?
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:58 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:44 AM Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
> wrote:
> >
> > hello all ,
> >
> > i encountered a KAS
hello all ,
i encountered a KASAN bug related .here are some related information...
---x-x--
[ 30.037312] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in
ata_exec_internal_sg+0x50f/0xc70
[ 30.037447] Read of size 16 at addr
hello ,
[ 55.169278]
==
[ 55.169899] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in
ata_exec_internal_sg+0x50f/0xc70 [libata]
[ 55.170039] Read of size 16 at addr c0723500 by task scsi_eh_1/149
[ 55.186354] The buggy address
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:22 AM Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> I just sent a fix for that timeout issue.
anyway thanks related to that
shall i send a selftest fix that bail out in the test program if the
user does not have root privileges ?
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:17 PM Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> Your user probably doesn't have access to the rtc device file.
anyway thanks related
Following is the result with sudo
x--x
$sudo ./rtctest
Thanks to all !
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:14:04PM +0530, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
> > A test for the basic NAT functionality uses ip command which
> > needs veth device.There is a condition where the kernel support
> > for veth is not
Hi Pablo,
Please follow up on the mail you sent.
This is for my interest to see my patch upstream
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:22 PM Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> Cc'ing netfilter-de...@vger.kernel.org
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:02:56PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > shuah wrote:
> > >
Hello Shuah,
did you get the mail related stuff below ?
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:17 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
> > A test for the basic NAT functionality uses ip command which
> > needs veth device.There is a condition where the kernel support
> > for veth is not
let me also work on that too. anyway thanks
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:46 AM Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
> > Error: Unknown device type.
>
> Feel free to send a patch that makes it display a more reasonable
> exit+error here.
--
software eng
anyway thanks for the reply. let me look on what you said and learn
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:15 AM Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
> > i think the script nft_nat.sh is assuming devices eth0 and eth1
>
> No it does not.
> These are arbitrary names
hello
i think the script nft_nat.sh is assuming devices eth0 and eth1
which may not be the case always. my suggestion is why not give the needed
network devices as arguments to the script. iam showing related
command line sessions below and error related file is attached.
> Your subject is too long.
ok . i have changed it
> Please upgrade bash?
anyway now i have an upgraded one.
here is a clipping related to the error
-x---x
Thu Feb 14 23:49:13 IST 2019
Running test: kmod_test_0007 - run #4
kmod_test_0005: OK!
-- Forwarded message -
From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
Date: Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: kmod: worked on errors which breaks
the overall execution of the test script
To: Luis Chamberlain
Cc: Shuah Khan , lkml
, ,
Andrew Morton
>
> o
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> I will take this patch and apply it to linux-kselftest next for 4.18-rc1.
anyway thanks .
> For next time, this patch should have been tagged v2 not RESEND. Also please
> include changes made since the last version in this spot after the
>
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> I will take this patch and apply it to linux-kselftest next for 4.18-rc1.
anyway thanks .
> For next time, this patch should have been tagged v2 not RESEND. Also please
> include changes made since the last version in this spot after the
>
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> The commit log doesn't match the commit summary. Please rephrase both the
> commit summary and log to indicate why this fix is necessary.
i will work related to that
> Odd. I don't see your patch posted on the
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> The commit log doesn't match the commit summary. Please rephrase both the
> commit summary and log to indicate why this fix is necessary.
i will work related to that
> Odd. I don't see your patch posted on the linux-kselftest patchwork and
hello
hello
> Oh ... one more thing. Did your e-mail client line wrap that last line?
>
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:306d4 TIME 1526932210 SOCKET 0 APIC
>> 0 microcode 2a
>
> That should all be on one line.
Sorry IF ANY Problem
anyway i send the message using gmail with plain text mode
--
software
> Oh ... one more thing. Did your e-mail client line wrap that last line?
>
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:306d4 TIME 1526932210 SOCKET 0 APIC
>> 0 microcode 2a
>
> That should all be on one line.
Sorry IF ANY Problem
anyway i send the message using gmail with plain text mode
--
software
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> How about this:
>
> $ sudo dmesg -r | grep -C 30 Bank
>
> -Tony
-->
$sudo dmesg -r | grep -C 30 Bank
x2apic: IRQ remapping doesn't support
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> How about this:
>
> $ sudo dmesg -r | grep -C 30 Bank
>
> -Tony
-->
$sudo dmesg -r | grep -C 30 Bank
x2apic: IRQ remapping doesn't support X2APIC mode
..TIMER:
> (*) Can you send a snip from the raw dmesg output that starts
> a couple of lines before:
>
>
> ... [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check: 0 Bank: 5 ...
>
> and continues a couple of lines past
>
> ... [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:306d4 ...
>
> and I'll take a look at why
> (*) Can you send a snip from the raw dmesg output that starts
> a couple of lines before:
>
>
> ... [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check: 0 Bank: 5 ...
>
> and continues a couple of lines past
>
> ... [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:306d4 ...
>
> and I'll take a look at why
> Ok, but please do not top-post.
Ok
> Looks like mcelog has trouble decoding this. Have you updated mcelog to
> the latest version in your distro?
.
mcelog 153+dfsg-1
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology
> Ok, but please do not top-post.
Ok
> Looks like mcelog has trouble decoding this. Have you updated mcelog to
> the latest version in your distro?
.
mcelog 153+dfsg-1
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology
ANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x1003 tx timeout
IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp3s0: link is not ready
Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initial
hci0: command 0x1003 tx timeout
IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp3s0: link is not ready
Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11
fuse init (API version 7.26)
rfkill: input handler disabled
r8169 :02:00.0 eth0: link down
r8169 :0
ignore this "i did not find this message in a typical 4.9.x kernel" line
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
<jeff...@rajagiritech.edu.in> wrote:
> as far as i know , may be there is not much change in system behavior.
> i just found these messages du
ignore this "i did not find this message in a typical 4.9.x kernel" line
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
wrote:
> as far as i know , may be there is not much change in system behavior.
> i just found these messages during boot time
> i did no
D (20180313/psargs-330)
->
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:27:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:19
80313/psargs-330)
->
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:27:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 09:19:11PM +0530, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
>>
t 5:20 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
> <jeff...@rajagiritech.edu.in> wrote:
>> hello ,
>>
>> the error from "dmesg -l err" related ...
>>
>> ->
>>
>&g
as far as i know , may be there is not much change in system behavior.
i just found these messages during boot time
i did not find this message in a typical 4.9.x kernel
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:04 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
>
hello,
i found two tests failed while i did "sudo ./perf test"
--->
24: Object code reading : FAILED!
64: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : FAILED!
hello,
i found two tests failed while i did "sudo ./perf test"
--->
24: Object code reading : FAILED!
64: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : FAILED!
hello,
output related of "sudo dmesg -l emerg" from my laptop...
--->
$sudo dmesg -l emerg
[sudo] password for jeffrin:
[0.041023] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check: 0 Bank 5:
hello,
output related of "sudo dmesg -l emerg" from my laptop...
--->
$sudo dmesg -l emerg
[sudo] password for jeffrin:
[0.041023] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check: 0 Bank 5:
hello ,
the error from "dmesg -l err" related ...
->
[1.709950] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure looking up
[\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.HEC.ECWT], AE_NOT_FOUND (20180313/psargs-330)
[1.710045] ACPI Error:
hello ,
the error from "dmesg -l err" related ...
->
[1.709950] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Failure looking up
[\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.HEC.ECWT], AE_NOT_FOUND (20180313/psargs-330)
[1.710045] ACPI Error:
thanks. i will work on...
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 05/09/2018 12:38 PM, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
>> aperf program uses /dev/cpu which is normally a root only
>> access area. so in that case to successfully run thet test,
>> root
thanks. i will work on...
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 05/09/2018 12:38 PM, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
>> aperf program uses /dev/cpu which is normally a root only
>> access area. so in that case to successfully run thet test,
>> root permissions are
hello Shuah,
i had later send another version of that patch.
anyway thank you daniel for your effort
thank you both.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 01:47 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 04/29/2018 01:12 PM, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
>>>
hello Shuah,
i had later send another version of that patch.
anyway thank you daniel for your effort
thank you both.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 01:47 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 04/29/2018 01:12 PM, Jeffrin Jose T wrote:
>>> Testing script for Intel
anyway my current is gcc (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
may be you can try ... make -C tools/testing/selftests 2> error.txt
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On 04/20/2018 11:03 AM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>&
anyway my current is gcc (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
may be you can try ... make -C tools/testing/selftests 2> error.txt
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:08 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/20/2018 11:03 AM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> the foll
Skip 0 Error 0
1..0
ok 1..7 selftests: raw_skew [PASS]
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Jeffrin Thalakkott
Skip 0 Error 0
1..0
ok 1..7 selftests: raw_skew [PASS]
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor wrote:
>> > selftests: raw_skew
>> > ==
I kind of ignored. i was not sure what that meant actually.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:03 AM, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
> <jeff...@rajagiritech.edu.in> wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>>
I kind of ignored. i was not sure what that meant actually.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:03 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
> wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> failure of a test in selftest:timers
&
selftests: proc-loadavg-001 [PASS]
Please add me in changelog if i was useful.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 8:41 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
<jeff...@rajagiritech.edu.in> wrote:
> hello,
>
> selftests: proc-loadavg-001
>
> not ok 1..1 selftes
selftests: proc-loadavg-001 [PASS]
Please add me in changelog if i was useful.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 8:41 PM, Jeffrin Thalakkottoor
wrote:
> hello,
>
> selftests: proc-loadavg-001
>
> not ok 1..1 selftests: proc-loadavg-001 [FAIL]
&
hello,
selftests: proc-loadavg-001
not ok 1..1 selftests: proc-loadavg-001 [FAIL]
To reproduce :
make -C tools/testing/selftests/proc run_tests
Linux debian 4.17.0-rc1+ #3 SMP Sat Apr 21 03:41:44 IST 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux
GNU Make4.2.1
hello,
selftests: proc-loadavg-001
not ok 1..1 selftests: proc-loadavg-001 [FAIL]
To reproduce :
make -C tools/testing/selftests/proc run_tests
Linux debian 4.17.0-rc1+ #3 SMP Sat Apr 21 03:41:44 IST 2018 x86_64 GNU/Linux
GNU Make4.2.1
hello,
failure of a test in selftest:timers
selftests: raw_skew
WARNING: ADJ_OFFSET in progress, this will cause inaccurate results
Estimating clock drift: 17.910(est) 16.820(act) [FAILED]
Bail out!
Pass 0 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0
1..0
not ok
hello,
failure of a test in selftest:timers
selftests: raw_skew
WARNING: ADJ_OFFSET in progress, this will cause inaccurate results
Estimating clock drift: 17.910(est) 16.820(act) [FAILED]
Bail out!
Pass 0 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0
1..0
not ok
hello,
i did a new git pull on my mainline linux kernel repository
i did "make localmodconfig" and compiled
i got a boot failure related. i got message about not able to mount
filesystem. it then loaded the initramfs shell.
i recompiled the kernel with ext4 file system inbuilt (i mean not as a
hello,
i did a new git pull on my mainline linux kernel repository
i did "make localmodconfig" and compiled
i got a boot failure related. i got message about not able to mount
filesystem. it then loaded the initramfs shell.
i recompiled the kernel with ext4 file system inbuilt (i mean not as a
hello,
the following is the error found...
---
protection_keys.c:421:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_set’
int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
^~~~
hello,
the following is the error found...
---
protection_keys.c:421:5: error: conflicting types for ‘pkey_set’
int pkey_set(int pkey, unsigned long rights, unsigned long flags)
^~~~
this is a test mail
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology
this is a test mail
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology
68 matches
Mail list logo