Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] perf tools: Introduce new 'ftrace' command (v4)

2013-08-28 Thread Jeremy Eder
On 130813 11:20:52, Namhyung Kim wrote: > 8<- > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c > index 9e78ec19caeb..10590b794cae 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c > @@ -555,17 +555,25 @@ sleep: >

Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] perf tools: Introduce new 'ftrace' command (v4)

2013-08-28 Thread Jeremy Eder
On 130813 11:20:52, Namhyung Kim wrote: 8- diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c index 9e78ec19caeb..10590b794cae 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c @@ -555,17 +555,25 @@ sleep: while

Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

2013-08-02 Thread Jeremy Eder
On 130729 12:59:47, Jeremy Eder wrote: > On 130729 23:57:31, Youquan Song wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > > > I try reproduce your result and then fix the issue, but I do not reproduce > > it > > yet. > > > > I run at netperf-2.6.0 at one machine as ser

Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

2013-08-02 Thread Jeremy Eder
On 130729 12:59:47, Jeremy Eder wrote: On 130729 23:57:31, Youquan Song wrote: Hi Jeremy, I try reproduce your result and then fix the issue, but I do not reproduce it yet. I run at netperf-2.6.0 at one machine as server: netserver, other machine: netperf -t TCP_RR -H

Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

2013-07-29 Thread Jeremy Eder
On 130729 23:57:31, Youquan Song wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > I try reproduce your result and then fix the issue, but I do not reproduce it > yet. > > I run at netperf-2.6.0 at one machine as server: netserver, other > machine: netperf -t TCP_RR -H $SERVER_IP -l 60. The target machine is > used in

Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

2013-07-29 Thread Jeremy Eder
On 130729 23:57:31, Youquan Song wrote: Hi Jeremy, I try reproduce your result and then fix the issue, but I do not reproduce it yet. I run at netperf-2.6.0 at one machine as server: netserver, other machine: netperf -t TCP_RR -H $SERVER_IP -l 60. The target machine is used in both

RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

2013-07-26 Thread Jeremy Eder
ntel, that the deeper C-states incur a cost too high to bear, as they've explicitly tested restricting the CPU to higher c-states of C0,1. -- Jeremy Eder -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More m

RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea

2013-07-26 Thread Jeremy Eder
a cost too high to bear, as they've explicitly tested restricting the CPU to higher c-states of C0,1. -- Jeremy Eder -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo