On 130813 11:20:52, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 8<-
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 9e78ec19caeb..10590b794cae 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -555,17 +555,25 @@ sleep:
> whi
On 130729 12:59:47, Jeremy Eder wrote:
> On 130729 23:57:31, Youquan Song wrote:
> > Hi Jeremy,
> >
> > I try reproduce your result and then fix the issue, but I do not reproduce
> > it
> > yet.
> >
> > I run at netperf-2.6.0 at one machine as ser
On 130729 23:57:31, Youquan Song wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> I try reproduce your result and then fix the issue, but I do not reproduce it
> yet.
>
> I run at netperf-2.6.0 at one machine as server: netserver, other
> machine: netperf -t TCP_RR -H $SERVER_IP -l 60. The target machine is
> used in bo
eems known, even within Intel, that the deeper C-states incur a cost too
high to bear, as they've explicitly tested restricting the CPU to higher
c-states of C0,1.
-- Jeremy Eder
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to ma
4 matches
Mail list logo
