Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/371] 5.1.20-stable review

2019-07-24 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.20 release. > There are 371 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 00/54] 5.1.19-stable review

2019-07-18 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:00:55PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.19 release. > There are 54 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/138] 5.1.18-stable review

2019-07-12 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 02:17:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.18 release. > There are 138 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 00/96] 5.1.17-stable review

2019-07-08 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 05:12:32PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.17 release. > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] nl80211: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-07-04 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 03:57:05PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 21:34 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 6/26/19 9:25 PM, Jiunn Chang wrote: > > > Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most > > > significant bit to uns

Re: [PATCH 5.1 00/55] 5.1.16-stable review

2019-07-02 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:01:08AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.16 release. > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] packet: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-06-27 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:22:53AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Shuah Khan > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:32:52 -0600 > > > On 6/26/19 9:25 PM, Jiunn Chang wrote: > >> Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most > >> significant bit t

[Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3] nl80211: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-06-26 Thread Jiunn Chang
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most significant bit to unsigned. Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang --- Changes included in v3: - remove change log from patch description Changes included in v2: - use subsystem specific subject lines - CC required mailing lists

[Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3] packet: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-06-26 Thread Jiunn Chang
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most significant bit to unsigned. Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang --- Changes included in v3: - remove change log from patch description Changes included in v2: - use subsystem specific subject lines - CC required mailing lists

[Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH] ethtool: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-06-26 Thread Jiunn Chang
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most significant bit to unsigned. Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang --- include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h index

[Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] packet: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-06-26 Thread Jiunn Chang
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most significant bit to unsigned. Changes included in v2: - use subsystem specific subject lines - CC required mailing lists Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang --- include/uapi/linux/if_packet.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion

[Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v2] nl80211: Fix undefined behavior in bit shift

2019-06-26 Thread Jiunn Chang
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined. Changing most significant bit to unsigned. Changes included in v2: - use subsystem specific subject lines - CC required mailing lists Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang --- include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/121] 5.1.15-stable review

2019-06-24 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 05:55:32PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.15 release. > There are 121 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 00/98] 5.1.13-stable review

2019-06-20 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 07:56:27PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.13 release. > There are 98 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/115] 5.1.12-stable review

2019-06-18 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:08:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.12 release. > There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/155] 5.1.10-stable review

2019-06-14 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 07:50:40AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:08:49PM -0500, Jiunn Chang wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.10 release. &

Re: [PATCH 5.1 000/155] 5.1.10-stable review

2019-06-13 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:31:52AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.10 release. > There are 155 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [PATCH 5.1 00/70] 5.1.9-stable review

2019-06-09 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.9 release. > There are 70 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.

Re: [PATCH 5.1 00/85] 5.1.8-stable review

2019-06-07 Thread Jiunn Chang
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:38:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.1.8 release. > There are 85 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know.