Possibly saying something extremly stupid here,
how about simply "fakewriting" 0xFF to the flash
after an erase to update any caches?
> 2. Flash. A few writes of magic data to magic addresses and a whole erase
>block suddenly contains 0xFF. The CPU doesn't notice that either.
do_erase_stuff
I have fixed most of the CONFIG_ETRAX stuff,
many of them are not visible in CML1... (at least not with menuconfig)
some of the LED stuff should probably not even be there.
Björn can probably submit a patch within a few days.
/Johan
- Original Message -
From: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Support for DS1302 is available in the CRIS port.
A patch for 2.4.3 (and a lot of other stuff you don't need) is available in
http://developer.axis.com/download/devboard_lx/R1_0_0/
/Johan
- Original Message -
From: Grant Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linux I2C Mailing List <[EMAIL PRO
Can't you do it like this?
# mkfifo fifo
# pppd notty < fifo | pppoe -I eth1 >fifo
/Johan
- Original Message -
From: Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 3:05 AM
Subject: How do I make a circular pipe?
> How do I do the following:
>
> #
Shouldn't a compiler be able to deal with this instead?
(Just a thought.)
/Johan
- Original Message -
From: Adam J. Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:36 PM
Subject: List of all-zero .data variables in linux-2.4.3 available
> For anyone
I don't have an answer but a related question:
Is there any "standard ioctl" to force an interface
to a certain link state, eg. auto, 10Mbs, 100Mbps,
half/full duplex etc.?
If not, can we create a standard ioctl mechanism for it?
/Johan
- Original Message -
From: Bernhard Bender <[EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Johan Adolfsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 13:34
Subject: Re: Arch specific/multiple Configure.help files? [PATCH included]
> Johan Adolfsson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Johan Adolfsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 11:39
Subject: Re: Arch specific/multiple Configure.help files?
> Johan Adolfsson wrote:
> >
> >
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 09:44
Subject: Re: Arch specific/multiple Configure.help files?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > This was already discussed on kbuild list.
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Rogier Wolff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Arch specific/multiple Configure.help files?
> [EMAIL PROTE
IL PROTECTED]>
To: Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Johan Adolfsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Arch specific/multiple Configure.help files?
> Erik Mouw wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:28:33PM +020
Would it be a good idea to have support for multiple Configure.help
files in the config system?
The main advantage would be that arch specific settings could
have an arch specific help file as well.
Anybody who knows: Would it be a easy to add support for this if
this is considered a good idea?
In short:
My listener socket _sometimes_ gets confused when a client
connect and closes very fast when the server has outstanding data.
The read fd_set with the listener socket is not set
by the select() call for new connections,
but if I do accept() on it anyway I will get the new socket!
I k
While trying to track down a possible select()/accept()
problem in 2.0.38 I noticed that theTcpPassiveOpens counter
is never increased (not in 2.0, 2.2 nor 2.4)
When checking more of the Tcp: fields in
/proc/net/snmp
it looks like some more fields are not set correctly
(tcpRto*, tcpMaxConn )
Jus
14 matches
Mail list logo
