On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Darren Hart wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:29:48PM -0600, John Dahlstrom wrote:
[...]
Thank you for that information. One commit is sufficient to apply the patch
to all kernel versions without fuzz:
4fa9dab ideapad_laptop: Lenovo G50-30 fix rfkill reports wireless
no_hw_rfkill list.
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
Cc: # 3.17.x-: 4fa9dab: ideapad_laptop: Lenovo G50-30
fix rfkill reports wireless blocked
---
Test configuration
Hardware: Lenovo ideapad Y700 Touch-15ISK
Kernel version: 4.4.2
Patch changelog
v2 split patch between Touch and non-Touch
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Darren Hart wrote:
Unfortunately, backporting this to stable is not quite so simple.
First, 3.16 doesn't really work as between 3.16 and 3.17 the following patch
landed:
ce363c2 ideapad-laptop: Change Lenovo Yoga 2 series rfkill handling
Which changes the name of the dmi_
no_hw_rfkill list.
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
Cc: # 3.18.x-: 4fa9dab: ideapad_laptop: Lenovo G50-30
fix rfkill reports wireless blocked
---
Test configuration
Hardware: Lenovo ideapad Y700 Touch-15ISK
Kernel version: 4.4.2
Patch changelog
v2 split patch between Touch and non-Touch
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Darren Hart wrote:
See stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to specify relevant versions. I'm curious
why there is a gap from 3.18 to 4.1.
What you probably meant was:
Cc: # 3.18.x
If you are going to take this approach, you may wish to verify that this applies
back to 3.18,
no_hw_rfkill list.
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
Cc: # 4.5.x
Cc: # 4.4.x
Cc: # 4.3.x
Cc: # 4.2.x
Cc: # 4.1.x
Cc: # 4.0.x
Cc: # 3.19.x
Cc: # 3.18.x
Cc: # 3.17.x
Cc: # 3.16.x
---
Test configuration
Hardware: Lenovo ideapad Y700 Touch-15ISK
Kernel version: 4.4.2
Patch changelog
Darren,
Thank you for your guidance. I have abbreviated the commit summary to
"ideapad-laptop: Add ideapad Y700 (15) to the no_hw_rfkill DMI list"
and submitted the patch as v3.
The initial patch submission had been corrupted by word wrap in my
email client.
Kind regards,
John
no_hw_rfkill list.
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
Cc:
---
Relevant kernel versions: 4.5-rc4, 4.4.2, 4.3.5, 4.1.18, 3.18.27
Test configuration
Hardware: Lenovo ideapad Y700 Touch-15ISK
Kernel version: 4.4.2
Patch changelog
v2 split patch between Touch and non-Touch devices
v3 undo patch
.
Tested-by: John Dahlstrom
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
---
Relevant kernel versions: 4.5-rc4, 4.4.2, 4.3.5, 4.1.18, 3.18.27
Patch changelog
v2 split patch between Touch and non-Touch devices
drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers
-by: John Dahlstrom
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
---
Relevant kernel versions: 4.5-rc4, 4.4.2, 4.3.5, 4.1.18, 3.18.27
Patch changelog
v2 split patch between Touch and non-Touch devices
drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers
no_hw_rfkill list.
Relevant kernel versions: 4.5-rc4, 4.4.1, 4.3.5, 4.1.18, 3.18.27
Tested-by: John Dahlstrom
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
---
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c 2016-02-14 15:05:20.0
-0600
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c 2016-02-16 03:54
no_hw_rfkill list.
Relevant kernel versions: 4.5-rc4, 4.4.1, 4.3.5, 4.1.18, 3.18.27
Tested-by: John Dahlstrom
Signed-off-by: John Dahlstrom
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c 2016-02-14
15:05:20.0 -0600
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c 2016-02-16
03:54:48.484423725
Regarding udp_port_rover (of linux/net/ipv4/udp.c):
In Linux 2.4 or 2.6, I noticed that selected local port numbers for UDP
resist roaming, unlike TCP ports numbers (tcp_port_rover) that appear
to steadily increase irrespective of concurrent local port usage.
What is the advantage of this lack of p
13 matches
Mail list logo
