Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
Pulse per Second (PPS) support for Linux.
Signed-off-by: Rodolfo Giometti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Please, note that this PPS implementation is not RFC 2783 fully
compatible since, IMHO, the RFC simply doesn't consider PPS devices
connected with special GPIOs or other
Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
Pulse per Second (PPS) support for Linux.
Signed-off-by: Rodolfo Giometti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Please, note that this PPS implementation is not RFC 2783 fully
compatible since, IMHO, the RFC simply doesn't consider PPS devices
connected with special GPIOs or other
D. Hazelton wrote:
(as is the GPL - if you release code under
the GPL you no longer have a legal right to it. Note the following text that
appears in the GPL:
" We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
(2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission
D. Hazelton wrote:
(as is the GPL - if you release code under
the GPL you no longer have a legal right to it. Note the following text that
appears in the GPL:
We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
(2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to
Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 21:48 -0800, v j wrote:
We only get crap because no one here yet knows how to interpret
proprietary modules loaded into the kernel.
The proprietary modules where only a tiny wrapper is linux-specific and
the rest is cross-platform are in a grey area,
Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 21:48 -0800, v j wrote:
We only get crap because no one here yet knows how to interpret
proprietary modules loaded into the kernel.
The proprietary modules where only a tiny wrapper is linux-specific and
the rest is cross-platform are in a grey area,
6 matches
Mail list logo
