> > Or are you saying that the bottleneck is somewhere
> > else completely,
>
> Indeed. The bottleneck is with processing the incoming network
> packets, at the interrupt level.
Where is the counter for these dropped packets? If we run a few mbit of
traffic through the box, we see noticeble p
> Malcolm Beattie writes:
> > Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter
> > is turned on.
>
> Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance
> degradation, that is for sure.
Do you think that netfilter being enabled would also cause a decrease in
routing t
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote:
> > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically
> > enable it at run time.
>
> I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in...
> Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it
> anywa
Hi,
/sbin/insmod cls__u32
insmod: cls__u32: no module by that name found
I think you meant cls_u32, not cls__u32. Your script output seems to
indicate that you've already got the modules loaded somewhere.
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 10:1 classid 10:300 cbq bandwidth
2
> Throughput: 100Mbps is really nothing. Linux never had a problem with
> 4-500Mbps file serving. So throughput is an important number. so is
> end to end latency, but in file serving case, latency might
> not be a big deal so ignore it.
If I try to route more than 40mbps (40% line utilization)
> > What are "zerocopy patch set"s?
>
> Basically, if you want to send something to the network, the
> kernel has to
> copy your data to its memory space. It is an overhead and with these
> patches, the kernel doesn't has to do it. So it is faster.
> Moreover, few
> ethernet cards are able to c
> I'm back from OZ, and to help deal with my sudden lack of Victoria
> Bitter, I've made a new zerocopy patch set.
What are "zerocopy patch set"s?
Cheers!
Jon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the F
That's just nasty! Funny, but nasty. :)
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Satchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> It took a while to prepare the source for this jerk. Here is
> what I did to
> the source I gave the guy:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
Title: RE: [OT?] Coding Style
I prefer descriptive variable and function names - like comments, they help to make code so much easier to read.
One thing I wonder though... why do people prefer 'some_function_name()' over 'SomeFunctionName()'? I personally don't like the underscore character
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Do the tulip driver updates address the increasingly common
> NETDEV timeout
> > repots?
>
> I don't see increasingly common timeout reports.. with which
> hardware?
> They are likely on the newer LinkSys 4.1 card
> -Original Message-
> From: adrian
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Mark I Manning IV wrote:
>
> > It is alot neater tho :P~
> >
> > // even for multi line comments
> > // no visual clutter over there -->
>
> /*
> * I tend to find standard C comments easier to read. They stand out,
> * espe
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry McVoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:04:50AM -0500, Jonathan Earle wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > So,
> -Original Message-
> From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> So, every good programmer
> should know where to put comments. And it is unnecessary to
> put comments to
> explain what code does. One should see this as stated in the
> CodingStyle doc.
> Ok, there are points whe
Hi all,
I've a system comprosed of two PIII machines, equipped with Znyx 346Q 4port
ethernet cards (tulip driver) which I'd like to connect together in a bonded
configuration. For various reasons, we require 2.4.0 kernels on our
machines - currently we are using 2.4.0-test9.
The setup is simp
Hey all,
Still working with kernel 2.4.0-test9 (other things we use require it for
now), and I was looking at a driver for a Znyx zx346q network card that I
grabbed from the znyx.com website. The driver is for a 2.2.x kernel, but
figuring I'd try it anyway, downloaded and tried to build it. It
el List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Kernel oops in mm/slab.c [ kmem_cache_grow() ]
> with test4-8
>
>
> > Jonathan Earle wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having kernel oopses with the 2.4.0-test series and am
> > including ksymoops processed out
Title: Kernel oops in mm/slab.c [ kmem_cache_grow() ] with test4-8
Hi,
I've been having kernel oopses with the 2.4.0-test series and am including ksymoops processed output from both test4 and test5 kernels. The same oops happens in later kernels too (Tested with test6, test7 and test8).
T
83 e5 07 and $0x7,%ebp
Code; c01270ff
12: 68 03 00 00 00 push $0x3
Aiee, killing interrupt handler
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task!
1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable.
---
Jonathan Earle
Linux Admin, ONC Software Development
18 matches
Mail list logo
