.Jorge Nerin wrote:
> Hello, today I got an Oops in 2.4.4-ac6, X crashed and gdm restarted,
> my system is a dual 2x200MMX, 96Mb, Voodoo 3 2000pci XFree 4.0.3, no drm.
>
In reply to myself I must add this series of Oopses and invalid operands
to my mail, also on 2.4.4.-ac6.
The s
fc ff 8b 03 e8 c5 11 ff ff 39 fb
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>> Short version:
>> Under very heavy thrashing (about four hours) the system either lockups
>> or OOM handler kills a task even when there is swap space left.
>
>
> First of all,
there is a race in the swap handling in SMP, and that the OOM
doesn't take into account the swap space left sometimes.
I don't know what to try next, suggestions?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
clone().
The way each program handles multiple conections is up to the program,
for example apache 1.3 and below does a fork(), mozilla does a
pthread_create(), BOA does a select() in only one process, and apache
2.0 and up does both a fork() and pthread_create().
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTEC
Guest section DW wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 11:33:34PM +0200, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>
>> Hello, good work with 2.4.x, but I miss one thing. in early 2.3.x the MS
>> keys, you know, two flags and one "properties" key worked as navigation
>> keys in
ey put you on the last console you where before.
This was very useful when working in the console, I use the console
sometimes, and I miss these feature.
Is there a plan to put back these keys to work, or there was a problem
of some kind and this feature got dropped?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL P
switch to another VT I still see the contents of the first VT that I
switched from X.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More m
m_sendmsg+0/784]
[sock_sendmsg+129/164]
[unix_stream_sendmsg+0/784] [sock_readv_writev+140/152]
[sock_writev+54/64] [do_readv_writev+387/596] [sys_writev+65/84]
[system_call+55/64]
Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 0c 90 8d 74 26 00 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d 83 c4 0c c3
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
97
[coma@quartz coma]$ uptime
8:14pm up 4:30, 0 users, load average: 0.19, 0.11, 0.09
but my system works ok, mostly, now I have just upgraded a Realtek 8029
(10Mb) because it gets hung to a Realtek 8139 (100Mb) just to found the
mobo has some kind of busmastering problems, but that's anoth
ons of 2.4.0-testX caused ne2k-pci to hang and remain
hanged until reboot.
System: Mb Gigabyte 586dx, 2x200MMX, 96Mb RAM,
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
---Cut
> Here---
> Linux version 2.4.0-test11-ac4 (root@ummagumma) (gcc
> version 2.95.3 19991030 (prerelease)) #1 Wed Dec 27
> 03:15:22 EST 2000
Try to compile with kgcc or egcs, gcc 2.95 is not a recommended
compiler, as it's know to miscompile something
>
> Note : I have a problem with my NIC : it has its MAC address set to
> 00:00:00:00:00:00 by default and I have to force it to its real MAC
> address specified in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.
>
> I hope this report might be of any use for you (and for me ;
.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
Thanks, I put it 2.4 because in the original doc it didn't say anything
about it, and I don't use a 2.2 kernel since a long time.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Are you sure you have enabled virtual terminal and console support in
character devices, and vga text console in console drivers?
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
er NTFS. I
believe that it's [un]compressed on the fly, but I'm not sure about this
fact.
The [un]compression mechanism could be a kernel thread calling a
userspace program (gzip, bzip2, definable) doing the actual
decompresion.
Don't know, just thoughts.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > Well, this is a little update to the proc.txt file, it's based in 2.2 kernel, and
>I have updated it a little to the 2.4 series, I have updated all the thing I have
>been told in lk, so I submit this in o
+3,11 @@
--
/proc/sys Terrehon Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>October 7 1999
Bodo Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+2.4.x update Jorge Nerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > Jorge Nerin wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> > > file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> > > files in /
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> > file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> > files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. I
lock btrl $0x0,0x4(%eax)
Code; c01a66d1
11: 8d 4c 24 00 lea0x0(%esp,1),%ecx
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Hello, this is a patch with some updates to the Documetation/proc.txt
> file, basically it contains updates to the new files in /proc/, new
> files in /proc, and a paragraph about /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn. It's
> far from complete, but it'
bit set, so it could be necessary to echo 0
to
+/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn, if you want to talk to this sites. For more
info
+you could read RFC2481.
tcp_retrans_collapse
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Well, I have tried it with 2.4.0-test10, both SMP and non-SMP, and the
> > > result is a little confusing.
> > >
> > > Under SMP a ping -s 5 -f other_host takes down the
as I said in a previous msg it gave me BUG()s very early in the
tests, and I still had network access.
If someone has a better sugestion as a nic stress tool I can try it, but
now I only have two ways of reaching this limits, ping -f of big
packets, and sometimes (only 4 or 5) during a copy of
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > So I think that it could be a little window near sock_wait_for_wmem that
> > could be SMP insecure wich is affecting me.
> >
> > The code of sock_wait_for_wmem in 2.4.0-test10 is this:
> >
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
> >
> > Ok, I reported it several times, but it gets ignored. I have a Realtek
> > 8029 (ne2k-pci), and with both drivers ne and ne2k-pci I can easily get
> > it stuck by doing a ping -f to a host in the local
boot is
needed to restore net access.
System is dual 2x200mmx 96Mb ide discs no interrupts shared, and as far
as I can remember all kernel from 2.2.x, 2.3.x up to 2.4.0-testx exhibit
this problem.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
ts or gets the maximum socket receive buffer in
bytes. The default value is set by the rmem_default
sysctl and the maximum allowed value is set by the
rmem_max sysctl.
rmem_max defaults to 65535 perhaps you could try to increase this and
then use setsockop
only managed to lockup the dual
machine by doing ifconfig up & down and insmod & rmmod, mostly because
the lack of documentation.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
sing a realtek 8029 (ne2k-pci) that sometimes hungs, it
stops working, nothing in the logs, no more interrupts, no respond to
either ip or arp.
ifdown & ifup don't solve it, neither rmmod insmod (ne2k-pci, 8390), and
BTW a 3c503 in the same machine continues to work ok (8390 based also).
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Navaho Technologies Ltd. Tel: +44-870-7034015
Well I do have a 486dx2 (66Mhz-24Mb RAM) Root RAID 0 using three disks,
and as far as I can see there are no spikes and the box runs smoothly.
Perhaps it's a cron job or some daemon.
--
Jorge Nerin
&
80 3d 90 e7 21 c0 00 cmpb $0x0,0xc021e790
Code; c01df3ba
10: f3 90 repz nop
Code; c01df3bc
12: 7e f5 jle9 <_EIP+0x9> c01df3b3
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
sometime ago that this question or something
similar has been answered, but the infamous truncate but bit some of my
mailboxes and I can't find it.
I think that this can be done without even using the original tree, only
using the patches, but I cant find a way.
Thanks.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL P
So look for processes in zombie state or D state. If you can't kill them
perhaps you will need to reboot.
If it increases slowly it could be another thing, but if it increases
suddenly at a fixed time it could be a cron job.
--
Jorge Nerin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
35 matches
Mail list logo
