Re: [PATCH] vmtime and vm balancing

emory never got above 88%. I will give it another try on Monday, I don't want any weekend issues to come up. Josh --- Josh Grebe Senior Unix Systems Administrator Primary Network, an MPower Company http://www.primary.net On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Hi, > > The followi

Re: Question about memory usage in 2.4 vs 2.2

were around 18%. I'm keeping the pop/imap server at 2.4 as 44% is standable, while not exactly desirable. I'm --- Josh Grebe Senior Unix Systems Administrator Primary Network, an MPower Company http://www.primary.net On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > inode_cache 189974 24

Re: Question about memory usage in 2.4 vs 2.2

. As far as speed goes, I am not able to measure any real difference (only testing pop3) between 2.2 and 2.4. I would blame this on the NAS device, a NetApp Filer F760 being only able to push about 110mbit sustained on the gig-e network. Thanks, Josh --- Josh Grebe Senior Unix Systems

Re: Question about memory usage in 2.4 vs 2.2

runwdown? Also, if this memory is cached, wouldn't it make sense if it were reported as part of the total cached memory in /proc/meminfo? And can this behavior be tuned so that it uses less of the overall memory? Thanks, Josh --- Josh Grebe Senior Unix Systems Administrator Primary Networ

Question about memory usage in 2.4 vs 2.2

These machines are dual P2-400's, with 512M ECC ram, adaptec 2940, and dual intel etherexpress pro 100 cards. I also tried 2.4.2-ac20 with similar results. Am I missing something here? I'd really like to move the farm back up to 2.4 series. Thanks, Josh --- Josh Grebe Senior Un