I tried this out and it works great.
Thanks!
Later, JOSH
On 11/1/07, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
> > I have had this board for a few months as well and I have needed to
> > patch the driver to use 0x0001 a
Alan Cox wrote:
It is not recognised by 2.6.24-rc1. I'm guessing it's because the
vendor ID is 0001 rather than something sensible. I patched the kernel
as follows:
A vendor ID of 1 is very very very broken. Do all boards have this or do
you have a faulty box (perhaps a misprogrammed EEPROM som
I have also seen this problem... I don't have any ideas. Is this a
module or compiled in?
Later, JOSH
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Costas Tavernarakis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not subscribed to LKML, so please Cc: me with any replies.
>
> I'm
What makes you think /dev/sda is the raid? For me cat /proc/scsi/scsi
lists all 4 drives which, to me, implies that it is raw.
fdisk could not partition the raid by default. I needed to use sfdisk the
first time. After that fdisk worked fine.
If I have both modules loaded I can mount /dev/i2
4 matches
Mail list logo
