this topic so I'm assuming
that the ball has been dropped. Please excuse me if an acceptable patch
has been submitted that I wasn't CC'd on.
Here is cleaned up version of Ed's patch that I believe addresses Dave's
stylistic concerns applies the relevant changes to both x86 &
I think it's pretty clear that Dave and Daniel were both correct and
that ACPI_PROCESSOR is the correct dependency for multi-socket systems.
However, it's worth noting that this dependency seems to be unrelated to
SMP support. Ed Sweetman has reported that his single-socket but
multi-core system d
I don't think this is quiet right either as Ed Sweetman has reported
that this issue doesn't occur on single socket/multi-core systems.
-J
--
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:50:50AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> powernow-k8 uses PSB BIOS tables to read frequency info on UP systems, but
> on SMP it requ
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:04:40PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Duane Griffin wrote:
> >On 16/05/07, Prakash Punnoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Maybe you want to give a hint in the p states driver help text?
> >
> >I think a hint is the right thing to do, but in the PowerNow! driver
> >rather t
to be enforced only if
SMP in enabled. The other powernow-* drivers likely have the same
requirements as -k8 but I am unable to test them.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Kconfig |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- linux-2.6.21.1.orig/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufr
007 17:21:35 -1000 Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>
> [adding linux-scsi]
>
> > Has anyone else noticed this regression?
> >
> > -J
> >
> > --
> > - Forwarded message from Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > From: Joshua Hob
Has anyone else noticed this regression?
-J
--
- Forwarded message from Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:38:20 -1000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: difference between 1.20.0X.13 & 2.6.20 in tree dr
7 matches
Mail list logo
