[PATCH 1/1][BUG] undefined symbol in legacy megaraid driver on 2. 6.12-mm1

2005-09-08 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, I've created a patch to address "legacy megaraid driver compilation error on 2.6.12-mm1 kernel. Please take this patch and let me know for any further concern. Thank you, Seokmann Sign-off by: Seokmann JU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -Naur old/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c

RE: legacy megaraid driver bug in mm-series

2005-09-08 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, On Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:01 PM, Ju, Seokmann wrote: > I've tried and it works fine. > I'm not sure where the problem is related to compilation. > Please provide more details. My applogize to all for confusion. There is an issue on compiling legacy megaraid driver on 2

RE: legacy megaraid driver bug in mm-series

2005-09-08 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, On Monday, September 05, 2005 9:06 PM, Jack Byer wrote: > 2.6.12-mm1: will not compile megaraid driver I've tried and it works fine. I'm not sure where the problem is related to compilation. Please provide more details. Thank you, Seokmann > -Original Message- > From: Jack Byer

RE: legacy megaraid driver bug in mm-series

2005-09-08 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, On Monday, September 05, 2005 9:06 PM, Jack Byer wrote: 2.6.12-mm1: will not compile megaraid driver I've tried and it works fine. I'm not sure where the problem is related to compilation. Please provide more details. Thank you, Seokmann -Original Message- From: Jack Byer

RE: legacy megaraid driver bug in mm-series

2005-09-08 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, On Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:01 PM, Ju, Seokmann wrote: I've tried and it works fine. I'm not sure where the problem is related to compilation. Please provide more details. My applogize to all for confusion. There is an issue on compiling legacy megaraid driver on 2.6.12-mm1 kernel

[PATCH 1/1][BUG] undefined symbol in legacy megaraid driver on 2. 6.12-mm1

2005-09-08 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, I've created a patch to address legacy megaraid driver compilation error on 2.6.12-mm1 kernel. Please take this patch and let me know for any further concern. Thank you, Seokmann Sign-off by: Seokmann JU [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff -Naur old/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c

RE: Slow I/O with megaraid and u160 scsi jbod

2005-08-29 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, > formatted the disks in question with a single JFS partition and they > still exhibit this behaviour when used by themselves. I have verified > that this behaviour is not present up until at least 2.6.12.3. Let me > know what info I can collect that would be helpful.. Thanks. Can you please

RE: Slow I/O with megaraid and u160 scsi jbod

2005-08-29 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hi, formatted the disks in question with a single JFS partition and they still exhibit this behaviour when used by themselves. I have verified that this behaviour is not present up until at least 2.6.12.3. Let me know what info I can collect that would be helpful.. Thanks. Can you please

RE: Followup: PROBLEM: Kernel bug at tg3.c:2456

2005-04-04 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:34 AM, Sergio wrote: > I made some tests again, switching back to the onboard dual > aic7902 scsi > controller (non raid) the tg3 dont hung anymore. > I just noticed the IRQ mappings change between the two settings. > The Broadcom eth get always the IRQ #25, the two

RE: Followup: PROBLEM: Kernel bug at tg3.c:2456

2005-04-04 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:34 AM, Sergio wrote: I made some tests again, switching back to the onboard dual aic7902 scsi controller (non raid) the tg3 dont hung anymore. I just noticed the IRQ mappings change between the two settings. The Broadcom eth get always the IRQ #25, the two

RE: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox}

2005-03-17 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:28 PM, James wrote: > This is still rejecting: > > patching file drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c > Hunk #2 FAILED at 43. > Hunk #4 FAILED at 68. > Hunk #5 FAILED at 1217. > Hunk #6 FAILED at 1225. > Hunk #7 FAILED at 1245. > 5 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving

RE: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox}

2005-03-17 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:26 AM, Andrew wrote: > Some of these things have already been done in Linus's > post-2.6.11 tree and > you patch throws lots of rejects. Please always work against the most > recent kernel - 2.6.11 is very out of date. Thank you for correction. I've created NEW

RE: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox}

2005-03-17 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:26 AM, Andrew wrote: Some of these things have already been done in Linus's post-2.6.11 tree and you patch throws lots of rejects. Please always work against the most recent kernel - 2.6.11 is very out of date. Thank you for correction. I've created NEW patch

RE: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox}

2005-03-17 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:28 PM, James wrote: This is still rejecting: patching file drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 43. Hunk #4 FAILED at 68. Hunk #5 FAILED at 1217. Hunk #6 FAILED at 1225. Hunk #7 FAILED at 1245. 5 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to

[ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox}

2005-03-16 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hello, Here is a patch for megaraid_mm/megaraid_mbox driver which makes it 2.20.4.6. Following is brief on the changes: 1. Added compat_ioctl 2. Reordered inputs on memset 3. Convert pci_module_iit to pci_register_driver 4. Added DMA_{32,64}BIT_MASK 5. Modified PCI PnP ID table Signed-off-by:

[ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox}

2005-03-16 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hello, Here is a patch for megaraid_mm/megaraid_mbox driver which makes it 2.20.4.6. Following is brief on the changes: 1. Added compat_ioctl 2. Reordered inputs on memset 3. Convert pci_module_iit to pci_register_driver 4. Added DMA_{32,64}BIT_MASK 5. Modified PCI PnP ID table Signed-off-by:

RE: [Announce] megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.4 patch

2005-02-03 Thread Ju, Seokmann
of two attributes in scsi_host_template. + On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:56 -0500, Ju, Seokmann wrote: + > + .sdev_attrs = megaraid_device_attrs, + > + .shost_attrs= megaraid_class_device_attrs, + + These are, perhaps, sligh

RE: [Announce] megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.4 patch

2005-02-03 Thread Ju, Seokmann
, 2005-02-02 at 10:56 -0500, Ju, Seokmann wrote: ++ .sdev_attrs = megaraid_device_attrs, ++ .shost_attrs= megaraid_class_device_attrs, + + These are, perhaps, slightly confusing names. + The terms device and class_device have

RE: [Announce] megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.4 patch

2005-02-02 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Tuesday, February 01, 2005 1:15 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > This patch is mangled. Long lines are wrapped, and appears to be in > ISO-8859-1, such that spaces (ascii 0x20) appear as hex 0xa0. This > makes it difficult to review, and impossible to apply. > > +// definitions for the device

RE: [Announce] megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.4 patch

2005-02-02 Thread Ju, Seokmann
On Tuesday, February 01, 2005 1:15 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: This patch is mangled. Long lines are wrapped, and appears to be in ISO-8859-1, such that spaces (ascii 0x20) appear as hex 0xa0. This makes it difficult to review, and impossible to apply. +// definitions for the device attributes

[Announce] megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.3 patch

2005-01-25 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hello, Here is a patch for megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.3 and megaraid_mm 2.20.2.5. The patch includes following changes/fixes - sysfs support for drive addition/removal - Tape drive timeout issue - Made some code static I am attaching and inlining the patch. Thank you. Seokmann LSI Logic --- diff

[Announce] megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.3 patch

2005-01-25 Thread Ju, Seokmann
Hello, Here is a patch for megaraid_mbox 2.20.4.3 and megaraid_mm 2.20.2.5. The patch includes following changes/fixes - sysfs support for drive addition/removal - Tape drive timeout issue - Made some code static I am attaching and inlining the patch. Thank you. Seokmann LSI Logic --- diff