On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:00:48 +0530 Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > - if (inode->i_nlink >= EXT4_LINK_MAX)
> > > > + if (EXT4_DIR_L
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
> > Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
> > > +{
> > > + return
es in an htree directory it sets the
inode link count to 1 and no longer counts subdirectories. The
directory link count is not actually used when determining if a
directory is empty, as that only counts subdirectories and not regular
files that might be in there.
A EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DI
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
> Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
> >> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>&
with a smaller extra_isize). which indicates
if the fields fitting inside s_min_extra_isize are available or not.
If the expansion of inodes if unsuccessful then this feature will be disabled.
This feature is only enabled if requested by the sysadmin.
None of the extended inode fields is cri
not have enough space we inform the user
that some EA would need to be deleted or s_min_extra_isize would have to
be reduced.
This would be online expansion of inodes. expand_extra_isize option will also
be added to e2fsck which will expand all the inodes and if for any reason
expansion fails for any inode then the EXT4_FEATURE_RO
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 10:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:10:56 -0600 Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 10, 2007 16:32 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > err = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, inode, &iloc);
> > > > + if (EXT4_I(inode)->i
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> +
> +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode)
>\
> +do {\
> + (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> +
> +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode)
>\
> +do {\
> + (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 15:51 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:17:06PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:06 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:06 +0200, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
> Hi,
> I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have
> hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have
> cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I
> tried to mess with
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 16:00 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe it is a nice idea to export statistics on the usage of a journal
> of a filesystem as well. That way one can more easy see if it would help
> to put a journal on an other harddisk.
There is a patch posted on linux-ext4
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 12:49 +0530, Karuna sagar K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The tool estimates the cross-chunk references from an extt2/3 file
> system. It considers a block group as one chunk and calcuates how many
> block groups does a file span across. So, the block group size gives
> the estimate of ch
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 02:16 +0530, Karuna sagar K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For some time I had been working on this file system test framework.
> Now I have a implementation for the same and below is the explanation.
> Any comments are welcome.
>
> Introduction:
> The testing tools and benchmarks availab
14 matches
Mail list logo
