On 2019-01-15 5:42 a.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:01:48PM +0100, Rene Schickbauer wrote:
>> To be frank, your argument, which boils down to "GPL is the only correct
>> open source license", makes me ashamed to have been advocating people
>> switching to Linux. This is
> Yes, the "GPL condom" attempt doesn't work at all. It's been shot down
> a long time ago in the courts.
SFLC maintains there is no kernel licensing issue[1].
As a side note, even Hellwig's suit against VMware was dismissed (he may
appeal)[2].
Debian and Canonical base their decision to ship
On 2019-01-10 9:40 p.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Sorry, no, we do not keep symbols exported for no in-kernel users.
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Can you please address the email that Lukas was responding to?
Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Yes, the "GPL condom" attempt doesn't work at all. It's been shot down
> a long time ago in the courts.
SFLC maintains there is no kernel licensing issue[1].
As a side note, even Hellwig's suit against VMware was dismissed (he may
appeal)[2].
Debian and Canonical base their decision to ship
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:07:52PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2019-01-10 17:32:58 [+], Hutter, Tony wrote:
> > > > But since when did out-of-tree modules use __kernel_fpu_begin?
It's an
> > > > x86-only thing, and shouldn't really be used by anyone, right?
> > >
> > >
Just thought a notice would be appropriate here that groeck has decided
to discontinue work on his it87 driver due to difficulties upstreaming
it, which is a shame, because it is the only working version of the driver.
https://github.com/groeck/it87/blob/master/README
Kash Pande
Just thought a notice would be appropriate here that groeck has decided
to discontinue work on his it87 driver due to difficulties upstreaming
it, which is a shame, because it is the only working version of the driver.
https://github.com/groeck/it87/blob/master/README
Kash Pande
On 2018-03-19 02:20 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Ryzen and Threadripper are only supported in v4.15+.
Nope, the offset for 1900X is not available in 4.15, I've had to
manually patch all systems otherwise monitoring complains they idle at 53C.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 2018-03-19 02:20 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Ryzen and Threadripper are only supported in v4.15+.
Nope, the offset for 1900X is not available in 4.15, I've had to
manually patch all systems otherwise monitoring complains they idle at 53C.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
gt;
> Responses should be made by Sun Mar 18 15:22:53 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Any chance to get the k10temp change for Threadripper 1900X offset
reporting included [https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10175457/]?
Kash Pande
signature.asc
Descrip
gt;
> Responses should be made by Sun Mar 18 15:22:53 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Any chance to get the k10temp change for Threadripper 1900X offset
reporting included [https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10175457/]?
Kash Pande
signature.asc
Descrip
11 matches
Mail list logo
