Re: [ck] 2.6.12-ck4

On 7/27/05, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Changes since 2.6.12-ck3: > > Added: > +s11.3_s11.4.diff > Staircase cpu scheduler update. Change rr intervals to 5ms minimum. With > interbench I can confidently say there is objective evidence of interactive > improvement in the human percept

Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?

On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:23 +0300, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:03 +0100, Kerin Millar wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:35:51 +0300, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > > > > Also, I believe that the -march=pentium4 option /was/ actually used up > > until

Re: Noob question. Why is the for-pentium4 kernel built with -march=i686 ?

ng (as noted in the link above, with the exception of the kernel and glibc) ... Also, I believe that the -march=pentium4 option /was/ actually used up until kernel 2.6.10 where it was dropped because of a risk that some versions of gcc would cause the kernel to use SSE registers for data movemen

Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.12-ck3

TIVE, > ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW); > return_VALUE(0); > } > else { > Hi, could you try the following patch please? http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=44f8e1a20cf3afe10a37