On 6/18/07, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want software back. I think it is *wrong* for me to ask for
> anything else. It's literally my personal "moral choice": I think the
> hardware manufacturers need to make
On 6/18/07, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want software back. I think it is *wrong* for me to ask for
anything else. It's literally my personal moral choice: I think the
hardware manufacturers need to make their
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
> and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
> nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
> that
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
that GPL3 is
On 6/11/07, Kevin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:13 AM, DervishD wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB
> pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any
> device whose storage is flash based.
On 6/11/07, Kevin K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 11, 2007, at 5:13 AM, DervishD wrote:
Hi all :)
I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB
pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any
device whose storage is flash based. Let's
On 5/20/07, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm pleased to announce an updated version of the x86_64 highres/dyntick
support patches against 2.6.22-rc2:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc2-x86_64-highres-v1.patch
Broken out version is available here:
On 5/20/07, Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pleased to announce an updated version of the x86_64 highres/dyntick
support patches against 2.6.22-rc2:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc2-x86_64-highres-v1.patch
Broken out version is available here:
On 5/16/07, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:53 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
> My experience is that no matter which name I pick, people will
> complain
> anyway. Previous suggestions included:
> jffs3
> jefs
> engelfs
> poofs
> crapfs
> sweetfs
> cutefs
>
On 5/16/07, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 15:53 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
My experience is that no matter which name I pick, people will
complain
anyway. Previous suggestions included:
jffs3
jefs
engelfs
poofs
crapfs
sweetfs
cutefs
dynamic journaling
On 5/15/07, Max Asbock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:12 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is bunch of fixes for ibmasm driver. They are untested as
> I do not have the hardware.
>
> --
> Dmitry
Thanks for the fixes. I will test.
Max
What userland tools are
On 5/15/07, Max Asbock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:12 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi,
Here is bunch of fixes for ibmasm driver. They are untested as
I do not have the hardware.
--
Dmitry
Thanks for the fixes. I will test.
Max
What userland tools are needed to
On 5/11/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:18:25PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Also notice that current cpus were not designed to work 300 years.
> > > When we have hw designed for 50 years+, we can start to worry.
On a related note, older
On 5/11/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 07:18:25PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Also notice that current cpus were not designed to work 300 years.
When we have hw designed for 50 years+, we can start to worry.
On a related note, older technology is
14 matches
Mail list logo
