Mr. Proper
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Mike Sklar wrote:
>
> Hopefully someone could enlighten me on the history of mrproper. I think
> its a great name for making sources *proper*. In particular I'd like to
> know what the *mr* might stand for.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Mr. Proper
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Mike Sklar wrote:
Hopefully someone could enlighten me on the history of mrproper. I think
its a great name for making sources *proper*. In particular I'd like to
know what the *mr* might stand for.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
It's amazing what masquerades as news. It's also noteworthy that they
didn't bother to have a native speaker of English to edit the article:
An executive of another affiliated company said that he felt the passion
of IBM, which is determined to invest US$1 billion, this year alone, in
Linux.
It's amazing what masquerades as news. It's also noteworthy that they
didn't bother to have a native speaker of English to edit the article:
An executive of another affiliated company said that he felt the passion
of IBM, which is determined to invest US$1 billion, this year alone, in
Linux.
of my 5-10 3cr990s and replace
> them with someone else's product?
> Nick
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> > IPsec support will be binary only.
> >
As I mentioned previously IP heavy is a euphemism for commodity.
-
To unsubscribe fro
IPsec support will be binary only.
-Kip
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So what is the truth to the rumors 3com was throwing around about the
> "linux driver with ipsec support"?
> Nick
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Martin Moerman wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Jun
IPsec support will be binary only.
-Kip
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the truth to the rumors 3com was throwing around about the
linux driver with ipsec support?
Nick
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Martin Moerman wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Brent D.
?
Nick
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Kip Macy wrote:
IPsec support will be binary only.
As I mentioned previously IP heavy is a euphemism for commodity.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
For heavy threading, try a user-level threads package.
-Kip
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> due to the nature of the problem (a pairwise mutual alignment of n
> sequences results in mx. n^2 alignments which can each be done in a
> separate thread), I
This may sound like flamebait, but its not. Linux threads are basically
just processes that share the same address space. Their performance is
measurably worse than it is on most commercial Unixes and FreeBSD.
They are not, or at least two years ago, were not POSIX compliant
(they behaved badly
This may sound like flamebait, but its not. Linux threads are basically
just processes that share the same address space. Their performance is
measurably worse than it is on most commercial Unixes and FreeBSD.
They are not, or at least two years ago, were not POSIX compliant
(they behaved badly
For heavy threading, try a user-level threads package.
-Kip
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
due to the nature of the problem (a pairwise mutual alignment of n
sequences results in mx. n^2 alignments which can each be done in a
separate thread), I need
I think that they are relatively friendly. However, if they publish the
interface to their card another company could come along with a card
with the same functionality and take advantage of pre-existing drivers and
undercut their price, thus taking away their margins. At least that is the
It can't because 3com hasn't implemented in the driver and they won't
publish the interface.
-Kip
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Brent D. Norris wrote:
> I just had one of the "3com Etherlink 10/100 PCI NIC with 3XP processor"
> float accross my desk, I was wondering how much the linux
It can't because 3com hasn't implemented in the driver and they won't
publish the interface.
-Kip
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Brent D. Norris wrote:
I just had one of the 3com Etherlink 10/100 PCI NIC with 3XP processor
float accross my desk, I was wondering how much the linux kernel
I think that they are relatively friendly. However, if they publish the
interface to their card another company could come along with a card
with the same functionality and take advantage of pre-existing drivers and
undercut their price, thus taking away their margins. At least that is the
This may well be a question whose appropriate response is RTFM.
However, I did look first.
I am taking a class on writing device drivers for Linux. I am currently
looking for a device to write a driver for. I first tried to get the
engineering specification for my soundcard, but after much
This may well be a question whose appropriate response is RTFM.
However, I did look first.
I am taking a class on writing device drivers for Linux. I am currently
looking for a device to write a driver for. I first tried to get the
engineering specification for my soundcard, but after much
18 matches
Mail list logo
