No, it doesn't.
Is that something that should help? Now that the error has occurred
once, it occurred again within 24 hours.
Thanks,
Kristina
On 8/18/05, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:49:05PM +, kristina clair wrote:
> > I've j
No, it doesn't.
Is that something that should help? Now that the error has occurred
once, it occurred again within 24 hours.
Thanks,
Kristina
On 8/18/05, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 06:49:05PM +, kristina clair wrote:
I've just come across this oops
I've just come across this oops. We're running gentoo with a 2.6.11
kernel, xfs + nfs + lvm (+hardware raid).
nfsd was not responding, and the load was at 27. the machine was
responsive, other than nfsd. everything had been responsive for at
least 9 months previous to this.
It seems like from
I've just come across this oops. We're running gentoo with a 2.6.11
kernel, xfs + nfs + lvm (+hardware raid).
nfsd was not responding, and the load was at 27. the machine was
responsive, other than nfsd. everything had been responsive for at
least 9 months previous to this.
It seems like from
Hello,
I have been told that dm_snapshot is still experimental in the 2.6.10
kernel, and I was advised not to have more than one snapshot created
at a time for the same logical volume.
Basically I am just wondering what the potential problems are with
dm_snapshot. Is there anything particular
Hello,
I have been told that dm_snapshot is still experimental in the 2.6.10
kernel, and I was advised not to have more than one snapshot created
at a time for the same logical volume.
Basically I am just wondering what the potential problems are with
dm_snapshot. Is there anything particular
6 matches
Mail list logo
