BUG 2.6.20-rc7-git1 - soft lockup detected

2007-02-02 Thread Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/Tlen.pl)
Hi, I get a lockup short after a bootup, hand written from the screenshot from remote location: ] softlockup_tick+0x87/0x96 ] update_process_times+0x33/0x55 ] timer_interrupt+0x40/0x60 ] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x3f ] handle_level_irq+0x84/0xcb ] do_IRQ+0x5a/0x71 ]

BUG 2.6.20-rc7-git1 - soft lockup detected

2007-02-02 Thread Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/Tlen.pl)
Hi, I get a lockup short after a bootup, hand written from the screenshot from remote location: c012d02b] softlockup_tick+0x87/0x96 c011cf1a] update_process_times+0x33/0x55 c0105213] timer_interrupt+0x40/0x60 c012d46d] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x3f c012e1b8]

Re: 2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared

2006-11-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/tlen.pl)
Adrian Bunk napisał(a): On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled. ... Please send the dmesg from

Re: 2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared

2006-11-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/tlen.pl)
Jesse Brandeburg napisał(a): On 11/16/06, Krzysztof Sierota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled. On identical server running 32bit kernel

2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared

2006-11-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hi, I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled. On identical server running 32bit kernel, same cards, same slots, same configuration running rc5 I see no errors. irq 48: nobody cared

2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared

2006-11-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hi, I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled. On identical server running 32bit kernel, same cards, same slots, same configuration running rc5 I see no errors. irq 48: nobody cared

Re: 2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared

2006-11-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/tlen.pl)
Jesse Brandeburg napisał(a): On 11/16/06, Krzysztof Sierota [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled. On identical server running 32bit kernel, same

Re: 2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared

2006-11-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/tlen.pl)
Adrian Bunk napisał(a): On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Hi, I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled. ... Please send the dmesg from

/dev/poll patch ?

2001-05-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hi there, has anyone possibly ported the /dev/poll patch from linux-scalability project to 2.2.19 kernel ? Thank you in advance. Krzysztof - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

/dev/poll patch ?

2001-05-16 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hi there, has anyone possibly ported the /dev/poll patch from linux-scalability project to 2.2.19 kernel ? Thank you in advance. Krzysztof - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-12 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Roy C. Bixler wrote: > I just had our mail server running 2.2.18pre15 (compiled with GCC 2.7.2.3) > go unresponcive yesterday. The console was flooded with > 'do_try_to_free_pages failed' messages for various processes and had to be > hard booted to the last stable kernel,

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-12 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Roy C. Bixler wrote: I just had our mail server running 2.2.18pre15 (compiled with GCC 2.7.2.3) go unresponcive yesterday. The console was flooded with 'do_try_to_free_pages failed' messages for various processes and had to be hard booted to the last stable kernel, which

VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-09 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hi, I recently changed the kernel from 2.2.15 to 2.2.17 and added new promise 100 card. During 3 days 2 production servers crashed 4 times and had several lockups when there was zillion messages like VM: do_try_to_free_memmory failed for XXX we then changed the kernel to 2.2.18pre3 + ide + raid

VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-09 Thread Krzysztof Sierota
Hi, I recently changed the kernel from 2.2.15 to 2.2.17 and added new promise 100 card. During 3 days 2 production servers crashed 4 times and had several lockups when there was zillion messages like VM: do_try_to_free_memmory failed for XXX we then changed the kernel to 2.2.18pre3 + ide + raid