[PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that it should be . Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c: rename charging dt property name

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 9, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Renaming the charging property names to have more meaningful: > > Renaming property "ti,back-battery-charge-enable" to > "ti,backup-battery-chargeable" > to tells OS that attahced battery is chargeable and OS can do charging. > > Renaming

Re: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c: rename charging dt property name

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 9, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: Renaming the charging property names to have more meaningful: Renaming property ti,back-battery-charge-enable to ti,backup-battery-chargeable to tells OS that attahced battery is chargeable and OS can do charging. Renaming property

[PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that it should be USB2-HS-PHY, USB3-SS-PHY. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 4 +++- 1 file changed

Re: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c: rename charging dt property name

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
of above patch as per discussion on above patch. .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-palmas.txt | 21 +++ drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c | 14 ++-- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org - k

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that it should be USB2-HS-PHY, USB3-SS-PHY. Signed

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Kumar to Device Tree Binding maintainers group

2013-08-08 Thread Kumar Gala
I'm tossing my hat into the ring of maintainers/reviewers for device tree bindings based on history of dealing with DT on embedded PPC and starting work on ARM SoCs. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala Cc: Pawel Moll Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Stephen Warren Cc: Ian Campbell Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Grant

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Kumar to Device Tree Binding maintainers group

2013-08-08 Thread Kumar Gala
I'm tossing my hat into the ring of maintainers/reviewers for device tree bindings based on history of dealing with DT on embedded PPC and starting work on ARM SoCs. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org Cc: Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com Cc: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com Cc: Stephen

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] devicetree: create a separate binding description for sata_highbank

2013-08-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > The Calxeda sata_highbank driver has been adding its descriptions to the > ahci driver. Separate them properly. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf > Acked-by: Rob Herring > --- > Changes from v2 > Fixed some indenting. > Changes from

Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] devicetree: create a separate binding description for sata_highbank

2013-08-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 7, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: The Calxeda sata_highbank driver has been adding its descriptions to the ahci driver. Separate them properly. Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf mark.langsd...@calxeda.com Acked-by: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com --- Changes from v2

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for MSM8974 Dragonboard

2013-08-06 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: > On 8/6/2013 8:47 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Aug 5, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: >> >>> This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard >>> which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for MSM8974 Dragonboard

2013-08-06 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 5, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: > This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard > which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family. > For now, just support a basic machine with device tree. I think the board is APQ8074 and not MSM8974. > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for MSM8974 Dragonboard

2013-08-06 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 5, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family. For now, just support a basic machine with device tree. I think the board is APQ8074 and not MSM8974. Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: msm: Add support for MSM8974 Dragonboard

2013-08-06 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 6, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: On 8/6/2013 8:47 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 5, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family. For now, just support a basic machine

Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] ARM: msm: Add support for 8974 SMP

2013-08-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: > Add the cpus bindings and the Kraitv2 release sequence > to make SMP work for 2 cores on MSM8974. > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts |

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: msm: Add SMP support for 8960

2013-08-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: > Add the cpus bindings and the Krait release sequence > to make SMP work for MSM8960 > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 + > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/kpss.txt | 16

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: msm: Add SMP support for 8960

2013-08-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: Add the cpus bindings and the Krait release sequence to make SMP work for MSM8960 Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani rvasw...@codeaurora.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 2 +

Re: [RESEND PATCH 4/4] ARM: msm: Add support for 8974 SMP

2013-08-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:15 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: Add the cpus bindings and the Kraitv2 release sequence to make SMP work for 2 cores on MSM8974. Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani rvasw...@codeaurora.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974.dts

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-08-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ar

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-08-01 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote: diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt new file mode 100644 index

[PATCH v2] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM SoC (MSM8974, etc). CC: Jeffrey Hugo CC: Eric Holmberg Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- v2: * Fixed init of stride * Dealt with a number of comments from Stephen Boyd: - use of instead of - declaring

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM > SoC (MSM8974, etc). > > CC: Jeffrey Hugo > CC: Eric Holmberg > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- [ had old device tree mailing list ] > .../dev

[PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM SoC (MSM8974, etc). CC: Jeffrey Hugo CC: Eric Holmberg Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt | 20 +++ drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 11 ++ drivers

[PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM SoC (MSM8974, etc). CC: Jeffrey Hugo jh...@codeaurora.org CC: Eric Holmberg eholm...@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org --- .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt | 20 +++ drivers

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM SoC (MSM8974, etc). CC: Jeffrey Hugo jh...@codeaurora.org CC: Eric Holmberg eholm...@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org --- [ had old

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote: diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt new file mode 100644 index 000..ddd6889 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation

[PATCH v2] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

2013-07-29 Thread Kumar Gala
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM SoC (MSM8974, etc). CC: Jeffrey Hugo jh...@codeaurora.org CC: Eric Holmberg eholm...@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org --- v2: * Fixed init of stride * Dealt with a number of comments from

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: msm: Remove pen_release usage

2013-07-26 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: > pen_release is no longer required as the synchronization > is now managed by generic arm code. > This is done as suggested in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/184 > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani > --- > arch/arm/mach-msm/headsmp.S | 41

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: msm: Remove pen_release usage

2013-07-26 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote: pen_release is no longer required as the synchronization is now managed by generic arm code. This is done as suggested in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/4/184 Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani rvasw...@codeaurora.org ---

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] DMA: Freescale: Add new 8-channel DMA engine device tree nodes

2013-07-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, wrote: > From: Hongbo Zhang > > Freescale QorIQ T4 and B4 introduce new 8-channel DMA engines, this patch add > the device tree nodes for them. > > Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/elo3-dma-0.dtsi | 90

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] DMA: Freescale: Add new 8-channel DMA engine device tree nodes

2013-07-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, wrote: > From: Hongbo Zhang > > Freescale QorIQ T4 and B4 introduce new 8-channel DMA engines, this patch add > the device tree nodes for them. > > Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/elo3-dma-0.dtsi | 90

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] DMA: Freescale: Add new 8-channel DMA engine device tree nodes

2013-07-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote: From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com Freescale QorIQ T4 and B4 introduce new 8-channel DMA engines, this patch add the device tree nodes for them. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang

Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] DMA: Freescale: Add new 8-channel DMA engine device tree nodes

2013-07-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 5, 2013, at 1:27 AM, hongbo.zh...@freescale.com hongbo.zh...@freescale.com wrote: From: Hongbo Zhang hongbo.zh...@freescale.com Freescale QorIQ T4 and B4 introduce new 8-channel DMA engines, this patch add the device tree nodes for them. Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang

Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] powerpc: Add iommu domain pointer to device archdata

2013-04-11 Thread Kumar Gala
hen a device is attached to a domain. > > Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi > --- > - no change in v11. > - no change in v10. > - Added CONFIG_IOMMU_API in v9. > arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h |6 ++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Kumar Gala - k --

Re: [PATCHv2] powerpc/crypto: Add property for 'era' in SEC dts crypto node

2013-04-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Vakul Garg wrote: > The crypto node now contains a new property 'fsl,sec-era'. > This is required so that applications can retrieve era info without > having to be able to read SEC's register space. > > Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg > --- > Changelog: > > v2:

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/crypto: removed qoriq-sec4.1-0.dtsi.

2013-04-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Vakul Garg wrote: > Removing qoriq-sec4.1-0.dtsi as it is not used by any soc anymore. > > Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-sec4.1-0.dtsi | 109 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-) >

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/crypto: removed qoriq-sec4.1-0.dtsi.

2013-04-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Vakul Garg wrote: Removing qoriq-sec4.1-0.dtsi as it is not used by any soc anymore. Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg va...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/qoriq-sec4.1-0.dtsi | 109 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 109

Re: [PATCHv2] powerpc/crypto: Add property for 'era' in SEC dts crypto node

2013-04-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 10, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Vakul Garg wrote: The crypto node now contains a new property 'fsl,sec-era'. This is required so that applications can retrieve era info without having to be able to read SEC's register space. Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg va...@freescale.com --- Changelog:

Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] powerpc: Add iommu domain pointer to device archdata

2013-04-11 Thread Kumar Gala
to a domain. Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com --- - no change in v11. - no change in v10. - Added CONFIG_IOMMU_API in v9. arch/powerpc/include/asm/device.h |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org - k

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove "config MPC10X_OPENPIC"

2013-04-10 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > The last users of Kconfig symbol MPC10X_OPENPIC were removed in v2.6.27. > Its Kconfig entry can be removed now. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle > --- > Untested. > > arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig | 5 - > 1 file changed, 5

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove config MPC10X_OPENPIC

2013-04-10 Thread Kumar Gala
On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: The last users of Kconfig symbol MPC10X_OPENPIC were removed in v2.6.27. Its Kconfig entry can be removed now. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl --- Untested. arch/powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/Kconfig | 5 - 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH] sgy-cts1000: Remove __dev* attributes

2013-04-03 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Ben Collins wrote: > Somehow the driver snuck in with these still in it. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Collins > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) applied to next - k -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH] sgy-cts1000: Remove __dev* attributes

2013-04-03 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Ben Collins wrote: Somehow the driver snuck in with these still in it. Signed-off-by: Ben Collins be...@servergy.com --- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) applied to next - k -- To

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add a new platform tree for ib8315. Also add the DTS and the defconfig for that board.

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Sergey Gerasimov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sergey Gerasimov > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ib8315.dts | 490 +++ > arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/ib8315_defconfig | 2121 > arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig|7 + >

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > >>>> >>>> + guts_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, >>>> + "fsl,qoriq-device-config-1.0"

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 17, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: >>> >>> + guts_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, >>> + "fsl,qoriq-device-config-1.0"); >> >> This doesn't work for T4 or B4 device trees. >> > [Sethi Varun-B16395]hmm I need to use the dcfg space for

Re: [PATCH 1/1] For MPC831x the bus probing function needs the fixup to assign addresses to the PCI devices as it was for MPC85xx and MPC86xx. The fixup of the bridge vendor and device ID should be do

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Sergey Gerasimov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sergey Gerasimov > --- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 71 +-- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > Can you repost with subject and commit log fixed? It appears

Re: [PATCH 1/1] For MPC831x the bus probing function needs the fixup to assign addresses to the PCI devices as it was for MPC85xx and MPC86xx. The fixup of the bridge vendor and device ID should be do

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Sergey Gerasimov wrote: Signed-off-by: Sergey Gerasimov sergey.gerasi...@astrosoft-development.com --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 71 +-- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) Can you repost with subject

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 17, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: + guts_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, + fsl,qoriq-device-config-1.0); This doesn't work for T4 or B4 device trees. [Sethi Varun-B16395]hmm I need to use the dcfg space for this. Let's see with

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Mar 17, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: + guts_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, + fsl,qoriq-device-config-1.0); This doesn't work for T4 or B4 device trees. [Sethi Varun-B16395]hmm I

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add a new platform tree for ib8315. Also add the DTS and the defconfig for that board.

2013-03-18 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Sergey Gerasimov wrote: Signed-off-by: Sergey Gerasimov sergey.gerasi...@astrosoft-development.com --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/ib8315.dts | 490 +++ arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/ib8315_defconfig | 2121

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove "config 8260_PCI9"

2013-03-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > The last user of Kconfig symbol 8260_PCI9 got removed in release v3.2. > Remove this symbol too. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle > --- > 0) Untested. > > 1) This probably is a second order effect of my commit >

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/qe: remove useless Kconfig default

2013-03-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 12, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > The Kconfig entry for QE_USB contains > default y if USB_GADGET_FSL_QE > > But USB_GADGET_FSL_QE got removed in commit > 193ab2a6070039e7ee2b9b9bebea754a7c52fd1b ("usb: gadget: allow multiple > gadgets to be built"). This default will

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/qe: remove useless Kconfig default

2013-03-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 12, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: The Kconfig entry for QE_USB contains default y if USB_GADGET_FSL_QE But USB_GADGET_FSL_QE got removed in commit 193ab2a6070039e7ee2b9b9bebea754a7c52fd1b (usb: gadget: allow multiple gadgets to be built). This default will therefor

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove config 8260_PCI9

2013-03-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: The last user of Kconfig symbol 8260_PCI9 got removed in release v3.2. Remove this symbol too. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl --- 0) Untested. 1) This probably is a second order effect of my commit

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Varun Sethi wrote: > >> +/* >> + * Table of SVRs and the corresponding PORT_ID values. >> + * >> + * All future CoreNet-enabled SOCs will have this erratum fixed, so this

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Varun Sethi wrote: > +/* > + * Table of SVRs and the corresponding PORT_ID values. > + * > + * All future CoreNet-enabled SOCs will have this erratum fixed, so this > table > + * should never need to be updated. SVRs are guaranteed to be unique, so > + * there is

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Varun Sethi wrote: +/* + * Table of SVRs and the corresponding PORT_ID values. + * + * All future CoreNet-enabled SOCs will have this erratum fixed, so this table + * should never need to be updated. SVRs are guaranteed to be unique, so + * there is no worry

Re: [PATCH 5/5 v9] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and iommu implementation.

2013-03-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Mar 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Mar 13, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Varun Sethi wrote: +/* + * Table of SVRs and the corresponding PORT_ID values. + * + * All future CoreNet-enabled SOCs will have this erratum fixed, so this table + * should never need to be updated. SVRs

Re: [libvirt] if_bridge.h: include in6.h for struct in6_addr use

2013-03-13 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/13/2013 01:05 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote: >> Thomas Backlund skrev 13.1.2013 20:38: >>> patch both inline and attached as thunderbird tends to mess up ... >> >>> - >>> >>> if_bridge.h uses struct in6_addr ip6; but does not include the

Re: [libvirt] if_bridge.h: include in6.h for struct in6_addr use

2013-03-13 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 14, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 01/13/2013 01:05 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote: Thomas Backlund skrev 13.1.2013 20:38: patch both inline and attached as thunderbird tends to mess up ... - if_bridge.h uses struct in6_addr ip6; but does not include the in6.h header.

Re: [PATCH 1/6 v8] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

2013-02-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 27, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > Hi Kumar,Ben, > I am implementing the Freescale PAMU (IOMMU) driver using the Linux IOMMU > API. In this particular patch, I have added a new field to dev_archdata > structure to store the dma domain information. > This field is updated

Re: [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/fsl_pci: Added defines for the FSL PCI controller BRR1 register.

2013-02-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 27, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:22:16PM +0530, Varun Sethi wrote: >> Macros for checking FSL PCI controller version. >> >> Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi >> --- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |4 >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0

Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/fsl_pci: Store the platform device information corresponding to the pci controller.

2013-02-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:56 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > This patch is present in the "next branch" of linux ppc tree maintained by > Kumar Gala. > Following is the commit id: > 52c5affc545053d37c0b05224bbf70f5336caa20 > > I am not sure if this would be part of 3

Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/fsl_pci: Store the platform device information corresponding to the pci controller.

2013-02-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:56 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: This patch is present in the next branch of linux ppc tree maintained by Kumar Gala. Following is the commit id: 52c5affc545053d37c0b05224bbf70f5336caa20 I am not sure if this would be part of 3.9-rc1. Regards varun This is now

Re: [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/fsl_pci: Added defines for the FSL PCI controller BRR1 register.

2013-02-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 27, 2013, at 5:33 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:22:16PM +0530, Varun Sethi wrote: Macros for checking FSL PCI controller version. Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |4 1 files changed, 4

Re: [PATCH 1/6 v8] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

2013-02-28 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 27, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: Hi Kumar,Ben, I am implementing the Freescale PAMU (IOMMU) driver using the Linux IOMMU API. In this particular patch, I have added a new field to dev_archdata structure to store the dma domain information. This field is updated

Re: [PATCH 8/15] arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1022_ds.c: adjust duplicate test

2013-02-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 21, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > Delete successive tests to the same location. The code tested the result > of a previous call, that itself was already tested. It is changed to test > the result of the most recent call. > > A simplified version of

Re: [PATCH 8/15] arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/p1022_ds.c: adjust duplicate test

2013-02-15 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 21, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: From: Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr Delete successive tests to the same location. The code tested the result of a previous call, that itself was already tested. It is changed to test the result of the most recent call. A simplified

Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/85xx: use for_each_compatible_node() macro

2013-02-12 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 3, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun > > Use for_each_compatible_node() macro instead of open coding it. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) applied to next

Re: [PATCH -next] powerpc/85xx: use for_each_compatible_node() macro

2013-02-12 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 3, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote: From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn Use for_each_compatible_node() macro instead of open coding it. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn --- arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: eliminate unneeded for_each_memblock

2013-01-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Cody P Schafer wrote: > The only persistent change made by this loop is calling > memblock_set_node() once for each memblock, which is not useful (and has > no effect) as memblock_set_node() is not called with any > memblock-specific parameters. > > Subsistute a

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: eliminate unneeded for_each_memblock

2013-01-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 4, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Cody P Schafer wrote: The only persistent change made by this loop is calling memblock_set_node() once for each memblock, which is not useful (and has no effect) as memblock_set_node() is not called with any memblock-specific parameters. Subsistute a single

Re: [v1][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0

2012-12-20 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote: > gdb always need to generate a single step properly to invoke > a kgdb state. But with lazy interrupt, book3e can't always > trigger a debug exception with a single step since the current > is blocked for handling those pending exception, then we

Re: [v1][PATCH 3/6] book3e/kgdb: update thread's dbcr0

2012-12-20 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 20, 2012, at 3:08 AM, Tiejun Chen wrote: gdb always need to generate a single step properly to invoke a kgdb state. But with lazy interrupt, book3e can't always trigger a debug exception with a single step since the current is blocked for handling those pending exception, then we miss

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

2012-11-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > Hi Kumar, > Can you please apply this patch. > > Regards > Varun Was waiting on the others to apply this all together. (ie getting an Ack from Joerg, and follow comments from Timur to be resolved) - k > >> -Original

Re: [PATCH 1/4 v2] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

2012-11-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: Hi Kumar, Can you please apply this patch. Regards Varun Was waiting on the others to apply this all together. (ie getting an Ack from Joerg, and follow comments from Timur to be resolved) - k -Original Message- From:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/dma/raidengine: add raidengine device

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:01 AM, wrote: > From: Xuelin Shi > > The RaidEngine is a new Freescale hardware that used for parity > computation offloading in RAID5/6. > > This patch adds the device node in device tree and related binding > documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Harninder Rai >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/fsl: Add PAMU bypass enable register to ccsr_guts structure.

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Varun Sethi wrote: > PAMU bypass enable register added to the ccsr_guts structure. > > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi > Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_guts.h |4 +++- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) applied to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [for 3.4] drivers/virt: the Freescale hypervisor driver doesn't need to check MSR[GS]

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 17, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > The MSR[GS] bit indicates whether the kernel is running in processor guest > state mode, but such a check is unnecessary. The driver already checks > for the /hypervisor node and the fsl,hv-version property, so it already > knows that it's

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [for 3.4] drivers/virt: the Freescale hypervisor driver doesn't need to check MSR[GS]

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 17, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: The MSR[GS] bit indicates whether the kernel is running in processor guest state mode, but such a check is unnecessary. The driver already checks for the /hypervisor node and the fsl,hv-version property, so it already knows that it's running

Re: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/fsl: Add PAMU bypass enable register to ccsr_guts structure.

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Varun Sethi wrote: PAMU bypass enable register added to the ccsr_guts structure. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi ti...@freescale.com Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_guts.h |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3

Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/dma/raidengine: add raidengine device

2012-11-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:01 AM, b29...@freescale.com b29...@freescale.com wrote: From: Xuelin Shi b29...@freescale.com The RaidEngine is a new Freescale hardware that used for parity computation offloading in RAID5/6. This patch adds the device node in device tree and related binding

Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and IOMMU API implementation.

2012-10-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 4, 2012, at 6:56 AM, wrote: > From: Varun Sethi > > Following is a brief description of the PAMU hardware: > PAMU determines what action to take and whether to authorize the action on > the basis > of the memory address, a Logical IO Device Number (LIODN), and PAACT table >

Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] iommu/fsl: Add iommu domain attributes required by fsl PAMU driver.

2012-10-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 4, 2012, at 6:56 AM, wrote: > From: Varun Sethi > > Added the following domain attributes required by FSL PAMU driver: > 1. Subwindows field added to the iommu domain geometry attribute. > 2. Added new iommu stash attribute, which allows setting of the > LIODN specific stash id

Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] iommu/fsl: Add iommu domain attributes required by fsl PAMU driver.

2012-10-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 4, 2012, at 6:56 AM, b16...@freescale.com b16...@freescale.com wrote: From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com Added the following domain attributes required by FSL PAMU driver: 1. Subwindows field added to the iommu domain geometry attribute. 2. Added new iommu stash attribute,

Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and IOMMU API implementation.

2012-10-04 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 4, 2012, at 6:56 AM, b16...@freescale.com b16...@freescale.com wrote: From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com Following is a brief description of the PAMU hardware: PAMU determines what action to take and whether to authorize the action on the basis of the memory address, a

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Add iommu domain attributes required by fsl PAMU driver.

2012-09-20 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 20, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Wood Scott-B07421 >> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 5:42 AM >> To: Kumar Gala >> Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395; joerg.roe...@amd.com; iommu@list

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Add iommu domain attributes required by fsl PAMU driver.

2012-09-20 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 20, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: -Original Message- From: Wood Scott-B07421 Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 5:42 AM To: Kumar Gala Cc: Sethi Varun-B16395; joerg.roe...@amd.com; iommu@lists.linux- foundation.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Do not disable IPI interrupts during suspend

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 20, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: > During suspend, all interrupts including IPI will be disabled. In this case, > the suspend process will hang in SMP. To prevent this, pass the flag > IRQF_NO_SUSPEND when requesting IPI irq. > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui > Signed-off-by: Li

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, wrote: > From: Varun Sethi > > Add a new field in the device (powerpc) archdata structure for storing iommu > domain > information pointer. This pointer is stored when the device is attached to a > particular > domain. > > Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi > --- >

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Add iommu domain attributes required by fsl PAMU driver.

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, wrote: > From: Varun Sethi > > Added the following domain attributes required by FSL PAMU driver: > 1. Subwindows field added to the iommu domain geometry attribute. > 2. Added new iommu stash attribute, which allows setting of the > LIODN specific stash id

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and IOMMU API implementation.

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, wrote: > From: Varun Sethi > > This patchset provides the Freescale PAMU (Peripheral Access Management Unit) > driver > and the corresponding IOMMU API implementation. PAMU is the IOMMU present on > Freescale > QorIQ platforms. PAMU can authorize memory

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] iommu/fsl: Freescale PAMU driver and IOMMU API implementation.

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, b16...@freescale.com b16...@freescale.com wrote: From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com This patchset provides the Freescale PAMU (Peripheral Access Management Unit) driver and the corresponding IOMMU API implementation. PAMU is the IOMMU present on

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] iommu/fsl: Add iommu domain attributes required by fsl PAMU driver.

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, b16...@freescale.com b16...@freescale.com wrote: From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com Added the following domain attributes required by FSL PAMU driver: 1. Subwindows field added to the iommu domain geometry attribute. 2. Added new iommu stash

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] iommu/fsl: Store iommu domain information pointer in archdata.

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:17 AM, b16...@freescale.com b16...@freescale.com wrote: From: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com Add a new field in the device (powerpc) archdata structure for storing iommu domain information pointer. This pointer is stored when the device is attached to a

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Do not disable IPI interrupts during suspend

2012-09-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jul 20, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: During suspend, all interrupts including IPI will be disabled. In this case, the suspend process will hang in SMP. To prevent this, pass the flag IRQF_NO_SUSPEND when requesting IPI irq. Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui chenhui.z...@freescale.com

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Do not disable IPI interrupts during suspend

2012-09-13 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 08:20:31AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >>> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:58 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> On Jul 20,

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Do not disable IPI interrupts during suspend

2012-09-13 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Aug 2, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 08:20:31AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:58 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Jul 20, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: During suspend

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >