On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>
>>>&
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> Use the Qualcomm
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
>> Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
>
> Let'
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile| 4 ++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/{ => qcom}/msm8660-surf.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/{ => qcom}/msm8960-cdp.dt
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile| 4 ++--
arch/arm/boot/dts/{ = qcom}/msm8660-surf.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/{ = qcom
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
Let's
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
As Stephen W has pointed out previously, the dtb filename itself is or
may be an ABI and the bootloader may be hardcoded to a name. So we
should avoid future
On Sep 12, 2013, at 5:47 PM, David Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
My original request to please use a common prefix for your product
families stands. Please prefix with msm-*, or if you have
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> On 9/9/2013 2:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>>>>>&
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 01:48 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/09/2013 01:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:48 PM
On Sep 9, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 01:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Some c
On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some comments below.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>>>
>>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM)
On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
Some comments below.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
snip
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) +=
On Sep 9, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/09/2013 01:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
Some comments below.
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/09/2013 01:48 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 9, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/09/2013 01:17 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 9, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/6/2013 2:50 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/9/2013 2:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
snip
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:32:22PM -0700, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
snip
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM) += msm8660-surf.dtb \
- msm8960-cdp.dtb
On Sep 6, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> On 9/6/2013 7:22 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>
>>> This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard
>>> which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard
> which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
> For now, just support a basic machine with device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile| 3
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974-db.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974-db.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..74106a8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974-db.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/include/ "msm8974.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974-db.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974-db.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000..74106a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8974-db.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/include/ msm8974.dtsi
+
+/ {
+
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard
which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
For now, just support a basic machine with device tree.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani rvasw...@codeaurora.org
---
On Sep 6, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/6/2013 7:22 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This patch adds basic board support for MSM8974 Dragonboard
which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
For now, just support a basic machine
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c |3 +--
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c |2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala
(for the fsl_pci.c) change
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
> which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
> base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
> dealing with the
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Kumar,
>
>>
>>> HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
>>> which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
>>> base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
>>> dealing with the
On Sep 3, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Kumar,
>
>>>
>>> On 09/03/2013 01:50 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4
On Sep 3, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
Kumar,
On 09/03/2013 01:50 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
base support
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
Kumar,
HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
dealing with the traditional platform device
On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation.
-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c |3 +--
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
(for the fsl_pci.c) change
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Kumar,
>
> On 09/03/2013 01:50 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>>
>>> HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
>>> which are all device
On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
> which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
> base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
> dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation.
>
On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation.
On Sep 3, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
Kumar,
On 09/03/2013 01:50 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
base support for parsing
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-08-30 13:02:42)
>> On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>>> Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-08-28 08:50:10)
>>>> On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Mike Turquette wr
On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-08-28 08:50:10)
>> On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>>> Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexer, plus the setup
>>> function to register the clock.
Should have at least something w/regards to a commit message.
On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Xiubo Li wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/fsl-ftm-pwm.txt| 52 ++
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
Should have at least something w/regards to a commit message.
On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Xiubo Li wrote:
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li li.xi...@freescale.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/fsl-ftm-pwm.txt| 52 ++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-08-28 08:50:10)
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexer, plus the setup
function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock
binding
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-08-30 13:02:42)
On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Kumar Gala (2013-08-28 08:50:10)
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexer
On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/28, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>>> This patchset aligns the msm_serial driver more with downstream usage and
>>> updates the driver's DT bindings.
&g
Move all bindings in bindings/tty/serial into bindings/serial so we only
have one place dir with serial/uart related bindings in it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
Note: I did not move msm_serial.txt with the feeling that Stephen will end up
removing it in his patch set.
.../devicetree/bindings
We had two bindings for the same serial device, it looks like the one in
tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt is the more up to date one so go with it and
merge a few things about the use/need for aliases in from
serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
.../devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:02:14PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> We appear to have:
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/
>>
>> and
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/ser
On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This patchset aligns the msm_serial driver more with downstream usage and
> updates the driver's DT bindings.
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Fixed up DT review comments
> * Dropped patches that were picked up in tty tree
>
> Changes since v1:
> *
100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/qcom,msm-uart.txt
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/qcom,msm-uartdm.txt
Acked-by: Kumar Gala
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Co
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> Let's follow the ratified DT binding and use uartdm instead of
>> hsuart. This does break backwards compatibility but this
>> shouldn't be a problem because th
(which isn't merged so
> far).
I'm not seeing any driver upstream even using the compatibles so might be worth
adding that we aren't even breaking anything upstream.
Otherwise you can add:
Acked-by: Kumar Gala
>
> Cc: David Brown
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
> arch
We appear to have:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/
and
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/
Which one do we want to keep, I'd pick the first, but I don't care too much.
Also, there appears to be a duplicated (but different) binding for the
fsl-imx-uart.txt in these two
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexer, plus the setup
> function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock
> binding.
>
> Includes minor beautification of clk-provider.h where some whitespace is
> added and
On Aug 22, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexer, plus the setup
function to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock
binding.
Includes minor beautification of clk-provider.h where some whitespace is
added and
We appear to have:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/
and
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/
Which one do we want to keep, I'd pick the first, but I don't care too much.
Also, there appears to be a duplicated (but different) binding for the
fsl-imx-uart.txt in these two
merged so
far).
I'm not seeing any driver upstream even using the compatibles so might be worth
adding that we aren't even breaking anything upstream.
Otherwise you can add:
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
Cc: David Brown dav...@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd sb
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Let's follow the ratified DT binding and use uartdm instead of
hsuart. This does break backwards compatibility but this
shouldn't be a problem because the uart driver isn't probing
/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/qcom,msm-uart.txt
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/qcom,msm-uartdm.txt
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
This patchset aligns the msm_serial driver more with downstream usage and
updates the driver's DT bindings.
Changes since v2:
* Fixed up DT review comments
* Dropped patches that were picked up in tty tree
Changes since v1:
* Dropped
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:02:14PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
We appear to have:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/
and
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/
Which one do we want to keep, I'd pick the first, but I
We had two bindings for the same serial device, it looks like the one in
tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt is the more up to date one so go with it and
merge a few things about the use/need for aliases in from
serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
---
.../devicetree
Move all bindings in bindings/tty/serial into bindings/serial so we only
have one place dir with serial/uart related bindings in it.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
---
Note: I did not move msm_serial.txt with the feeling that Stephen will end up
removing it in his patch set
On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/28, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
This patchset aligns the msm_serial driver more with downstream usage and
updates the driver's DT bindings.
Changes since v2:
* Fixed up DT review comments
On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The msm serial device bindings were added to the DTS files but
> never documented. Let's document them now and also fix things up
> so that it's clearer what hardware is supported. Instead of using
> hsuart (for high speed uart), let's use
On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:48 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
The msm serial device bindings were added to the DTS files but
never documented. Let's document them now and also fix things up
so that it's clearer what hardware is supported. Instead of using
hsuart (for high speed uart), let's use uartdm
On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/20/13 07:41, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/msm_serial.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/s
On Aug 20, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 09:33 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:09:11PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 08:37 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug
On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:54 +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Indeed, I tend to think that reg-names is a bad idea.
>>
>> IIRC, the rule for "reg" is that entries must always have a defined
>> order, so that it can always be accessed by integer
On Aug 16, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 01:09 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM
>> SoC (MSM8974, etc).
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/msm-tcsr-mutex
On Aug 15, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 20:09 +0100, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: should be "qcom,tcsr-mutex"
>> +- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registers
>> +- reg-
On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The msm serial device bindings were added to the DTS files but
> never documented. Let's document them now and also fix things up
> so that it's clearer what hardware is supported. Instead of using
> hsuart (for high speed uart), let's use
On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
The msm serial device bindings were added to the DTS files but
never documented. Let's document them now and also fix things up
so that it's clearer what hardware is supported. Instead of using
hsuart (for high speed uart), let's use uartdm
On Aug 15, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 20:09 +0100, Kumar Gala wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be qcom,tcsr-mutex
+- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registers
+- reg-names:
+mutex-base - string to identify
On Aug 16, 2013, at 5:55 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/14/2013 01:09 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM
SoC (MSM8974, etc).
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/msm-tcsr-mutex.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree
On Aug 19, 2013, at 6:12 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 23:54 +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
Indeed, I tend to think that reg-names is a bad idea.
IIRC, the rule for reg is that entries must always have a defined
order, so that it can always be accessed by integer index.
On Aug 20, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 09:33 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:09:11PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 08:37 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:32:23PM +0300,
On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/20/13 07:41, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/msm_serial.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/msm_serial.txt
new file mode 100644
On Aug 16, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Hey Kumar-
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:53:27PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright
>
On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> From: Kenneth Heitke
>
> System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
> developed by the MIPI (Mobile Industry Process Interface) Alliance
> optimized for the real time control of Power Management ICs (PMIC).
>
> SPMI is a
On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>
>>> Right now we have
>>>
>>> pll8: pll8 {
>>> #clock-cells = <0>;
>>>
On Aug 15, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Right now we have
>>
>>pll8: pll8 {
>>#clock-cells = <0>;
>>compatible = "qcom,pll";
>>clocks = <>;
>>};
>>
>> in DT and
>>
>>static struct pll_desc pll8_desc = {
>>
On Aug 15, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Right now we have
pll8: pll8 {
#clock-cells = 0;
compatible = qcom,pll;
clocks = pxo;
};
in DT and
static struct pll_desc pll8_desc = {
.l_reg =
On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 15, 2013, at 12:02 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Right now we have
pll8: pll8 {
#clock-cells = 0;
compatible = qcom,pll;
clocks = pxo;
};
in DT and
static struct
On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
From: Kenneth Heitke khei...@codeaurora.org
System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
developed by the MIPI (Mobile Industry Process Interface) Alliance
optimized for the real time control of Power Management ICs (PMIC).
On Aug 16, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
Hey Kumar-
Thanks for the review.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:53:27PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Josh Cartwright wrote:
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright jo...@codeaurora.org
---
.../devicetree/bindings/spmi
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM
SoC (MSM8974, etc).
CC: Jeffrey Hugo
CC: Eric Holmberg
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
v3:
* moved dt binding into hwlock/
* removed smp_mb() as they were not needed
* cleanup warning
v2:
* Fixed init of stride
* Dealt
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM
SoC (MSM8974, etc).
CC: Jeffrey Hugo jh...@codeaurora.org
CC: Eric Holmberg eholm...@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org
---
v3:
* moved dt binding into hwlock/
* removed smp_mb() as they were
On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'.
>> The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more
>> generic
On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'.
The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more
generic (like
On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:25 AM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar"
>
> add OF support for the tvp7002 driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar
> ---
> This patch depends on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2842680/
>
> Changes for v5:
> 1: Fixed review comments pointed by Hans.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> This patch adds a check for DT passed reset-gpios property and deasserts/
> asserts reset pin on probe/remove with configurable delay. Corresponding
> binding documentation is also updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
>
On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:31:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:53 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov"
>>>
>>> MSM USB3.0 core wrapper con
On Aug 10, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> + Grant
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devi
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/10/13 12:11, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> Otherwise, Stephen - do we have your Ack here? I was happy to see your
>> review but not sure what's the latest status.
>
> The smp_mb() should be removed. Otherwise I'm willing to accept that we
>
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 08/10/13 12:11, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
Otherwise, Stephen - do we have your Ack here? I was happy to see your
review but not sure what's the latest status.
The smp_mb() should be removed. Otherwise I'm willing to accept that we
only
On Aug 10, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
+ Grant
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
b
On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:31:58AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:53 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
From: Ivan T. Ivanov iiva...@mm-sol.com
MSM USB3.0 core wrapper consist of USB3.0 IP (SNPS)
probably good to spell out
On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
This patch adds a check for DT passed reset-gpios property and deasserts/
asserts reset pin on probe/remove with configurable delay. Corresponding
binding documentation is also updated.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth
On Aug 11, 2013, at 1:25 AM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
From: Lad, Prabhakar prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com
add OF support for the tvp7002 driver.
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com
---
This patch depends on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2842680/
Changes for v5:
1:
On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the
>> usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that
>> it should b
sion is going on the property name.
>
> To correct the property name, I am sending this patch on top of above patch
> as per discussion on above patch.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-palmas.txt | 21 +++
> drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c
901 - 1000 of 1752 matches
Mail list logo
