This patch enables more new hardware.
ACKed-by: Kylene Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Forwarded Message
From: Philipp Matthias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kylene Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] linux-2.6.13/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c
on
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 08:35 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Kylene Jo Hall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:22 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Here is the patch that should fix t
The patch that was attached to this orginal message looks good to me and
can be applied to the Tpm driver.
Thanks,
Kylie
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 15:16 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Nope. Please use %Z for size_t args.
>
>
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:14 -0500, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 13:33 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:04:25PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:02:24PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 13:33 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:04:25PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > >On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:02:24PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > >>Kylene Hall wrote:
> > >>
> > what is the purpose of this pci_dev_get/put? attemptin
Thanks for the helpful comments I am working on a patch to fix your
concerns but I have a couple of questions.
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 22:51 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > + down(&chip->timer_manipulation_mutex);
> > + chip->time_expired = 0;
> > + init_timer(&chip->device_timer);
> > + c
6 matches
Mail list logo