Roland Dreier wrote:
> OK, let's try to avoid going off into the weeds here. In the context
> of the specific patch that this thread started with, is there any
> point in having both "msix-single-vector" and "msi" interrupt support?
This driver supports some chipsets that do MSI, and some that do
Hi Dan,
I've been looking over how your patches change the ioatdma driver. I
like the idea of removing the multiple entry points for virtual address
vs. page struct arguments, and just using dma_addr_t for the driver
interfaces.
But, I don't think having both ioatdma and iop-adma implement map_p
2 matches
Mail list logo
