On 2/4/2016 11:29 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:28:50AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +0800, Li, Weigang wrote:
Please can you advise how to get the acomp patch accepted?
Can you do a posting of these patches without scomp so we can
evaluate
On 2/1/2016 10:11 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:09:01PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:19:42PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
I have tested asynchronous compression APIs in zram and I saw
regression. Atomic allocation and setting up SG lists are culprit
for
On 1/27/2016 4:09 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:03:55PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:59:05PM +0800, Li, Weigang wrote:
The acomp is also SG-based, while scomp only accepts flat buffer.
Right, but do we need a pointer-based scomp at all? IPComp would
On 1/27/2016 3:41 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 05:15:06PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
From: Weigang Li
Now, asynchronous compression APIs are supported. There is no asynchronous
compression driver now but this APIs can be used as front-end to
synchronous compression algorithm. I
4 matches
Mail list logo
