hi Greg
On 6/23/2017 10:41 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 05:58:29PM -0500, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Yi Li
This adds DRIVER_DATA_REQ_NO_CACHE flag with .req flag under struct
driver_data_req_params. When this flag is set, the driver_data driver
will not cache the firmwa
On 6/19/2017 8:48 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 05:51:08PM -0500, Li, Yi wrote:
Hi Greg,
On 6/17/2017 2:38 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:40:11PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:05:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05
Hi Greg,
On 6/17/2017 2:38 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 09:40:11PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:05:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 02:39:33PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
As the firmware API evolves we keep extending functions
? Or do we expose this as a
flag on a regular async call? With the approach I take we expose the internal
functionality clearly and later Li Yi folds it as public API through a
parameter for the async API. Later he extends iwlwifi with just 2 lines of code
to get this functionality. This would lat
On 6/7/2017 12:59 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:31:54PM -0500, Li, Yi wrote:
We use the cache upon suspend to cache the firmware so that upon resume a
request will use that cache, to avoid the file lookup on disk. Doing a test
with qemu suspend + resume is possible but
Hi Luis,
On 5/24/2017 2:03 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 01:46:56AM -0500, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Yi Li
Changes in v2:
- Rebase to Luis R. Rodriguez's 20170501-driver-data-try2
branch
- Expose DRIVER_DATA_REQ_NO_CACHE flag to public
driver
hi Luis
On 5/25/2017 5:43 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Li, Yi wrote:
This patch is for "disabling the cache" for streaming and iwlwifi case,
adding the test to verify the cache function should be a separate patch,
right? I can look more into the
hi Luis
On 5/24/2017 2:03 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 01:46:56AM -0500, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Yi Li
Changes in v2:
- Rebase to Luis R. Rodriguez's 20170501-driver-data-try2
branch
- Expose DRIVER_DATA_REQ_NO_CACHE flag to public
driver_
On 5/23/2017 10:25 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
+
+ mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_FIRMWARE_REQ;
+ while (length > 0) {
This could be "do { ... } while ((params.fw_size >= FIRMWARE_CHUNK_SZ)
&& (length > 0));" since that's what it's really
On 5/23/2017 10:25 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
+
+ mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_FIRMWARE_REQ;
+ while (length > 0) {
This could be "do { ... } while ((params.fw_size >= FIRMWARE_CHUNK_SZ)
&& (length > 0));" since that's what it's really
hi Alan
On 5/22/2017 4:09 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:49 AM, wrote:
Hi Yi,
From: Yi Li
Since the FPGA image are getting bigger in size, this add an new API
fpga_mgr_firmware_stream
You could replace the guts of the current fpga_mgr_firmware_load()
with this new API (k
hi Luis
On 5/11/2017 12:11 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:46:27PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Luis,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:45:35AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
+To test an async call one could do::
+
+echo anything > /lib/firmware/test-driver_data.bi
On 5/2/2017 3:49 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
As the firmware API evolves we keep extending functions with more arguments.
Stop this nonsense by proving an extensible data structure which can be used
to represent both user parameters and private internal parameters.
We introduce 3 data structu
hi Hao
On 3/30/2017 7:08 AM, Wu Hao wrote:
From: Xiao Guangrong
Device Featuer List structure creates a link list of feature headers
within the MMIO space to provide an extensiable way of adding features.
The Intel FPGA PCIe driver walks through the feature headers to enumerate
feature devic
On 4/20/2017 12:29 PM, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
Add FPGA manager driver for loading Arria/Cyclone/Stratix
FPGAs via CvP.
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin
---
Hi Anatolij,
Since you say the driver works with Arria-10, I though
hi Luis,
On 3/27/2017 2:36 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 06:18:09PM -0600, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Yi Li
Add function to load firmware in multiple chucks instead of
loading the whole big firmware file at once.
Signed-off-by: Yi Li
---
drivers/base/firm
Alan
On 3/20/2017 1:34 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
+int
+stream_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
+struct device *device, size_t offset, size_t length)
+{
+ size_t ret;
+
+ /* Need to pin this
hi Matthew,
On 3/13/2017 4:09 PM, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Li, Yi wrote:
Hi Matthew
Hi Yi,
On 3/10/2017 11:44 AM, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Yi Li
Hi Yi,
Just one question
Thanks Alan for the comments.
On 3/13/2017 1:00 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 6:18 PM, wrote:
Hi Yi,
Thanks for your RFC. I believe this functionality is badly needed.
I had a few comments about the chunk size and some nits about comments below...
From: Yi Li
Add fpga_mg
Hi Matthew
On 3/10/2017 11:44 AM, matthew.gerl...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, yi1...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Yi Li
Hi Yi,
Just one question below.
Matthew Gerlach
Add function to load firmware in multiple chucks instead of
loading the whole big firmware file at
hi Alan
On 2/15/2017 10:14 AM, Alan Tull wrote:
Document that getting a reference to a FPGA Manager has been
separated from locking the FPGA Mangager for use.
fpga_mgr_lock/unlock functions get/release mutex.
of_fpga_mgr_get, fpga_mgr_get, and fpga_mgr_put no longer lock
the FPGA manager mute
21 matches
Mail list logo
