> No, actually the instability starts right after/when the root
> filesystem is mounted (it seems). I have no foreign modules installed
> when this error occurs. Even if I did, why would the Abit KA7 with the
> same [other] hardware and software NOT show this problem, even with all
> opts enab
- Original Message -
From: "Steven N. Hirsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: Phantom PS/2 mouse persists..
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrot
> > Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.2/specs
> > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> > % /usr/bin/gcc -Wall -O2 -o bug bug.c; ./bug
> > 0x8480
> > % /usr/gcc/aeb/bin/gcc -v
> > Reading specs from
/usr/gcc/aeb/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/specs
> > gcc versio
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux Kernel Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: Need info on the use of certain datastructures and the first
C++
> > files in the kernel will all be happy in Linuxland. Can any external
>
> Why do you need to touch any existing kernel .c source file ? If you make
> that patch, this breaks "situation 1" above.
It doesn't break situation 1 as the minor changes I've made to those 2 C
files should not have
So which is the recommended compiler for each kernel version 2.2.x,
2.4.x(pre?) nowadays? I've pretty much kept gcc 2.7.2.3 around just for
compiling the kernel however now I hear you need egcs to compile 2.4? I
don't mind keeping 2.7.2.3 around in its own installation directory just for
the pur
Hi all,
After a delay on some other project I've again started up the process of
fixing up the Linux headers, i.e. removing the use of C++ keywords as
variable and stuff. I have questions on the use of three datastructures
which happen to use the C++ keyword new but first a couple of things.
Hi all,
I'm looking through the suggestions and stuff that I have gotten so far.
As for the extern "C" stuff I'm torn between fixing the headers internally
or making side-by-side header files for C++ users. Such as:
a.h exists. So I create a a.hpp which contains somthing like the following
OK I've decided to give this a shot, IF there is sufficient interest out
there for C++ safe headers. So all you coders out there who have tried and
failed or who wish to program kernel modules in C++ join in and help out by
listing the errors you have encountered with the current header setup
Wasn't the original complaint that the kernel headers use C++ keyword
and thus prevent the writing of, at least some, modules in C++. I have
written C++ code before that was as least as fast as comparable C code and
more efficient in some ways. Whether this could be or not be reproduced in
k
Hi,
I was just wondering if there was some reason why the HPT370's RAID
capabilities weren't supported in the enhanced IDE patch for 2.2.*? Or if
support for its RAID capabilities were being worked on. I noticed FreeBSD
also appears to fail to support its RAID features so I am partially in
Hi,
I was wondering if support for the HPT370 RAID capabilities is planned?
I found that with the IDE patch from Hedrick I was able to get regular EIDE
device support for this controller however I was hoping to use its RAID
capabilities. Is work on this being done? Thanks for any help.
-
T
12 matches
Mail list logo
