Re: [PATCH] hwmon: asus_atk0110.c fix uninitialized data access

2017-03-23 Thread Luca Tettamanti
: 2c03d07ad54d ("hwmon: Add Asus ATK0110 support") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Luca Tettamanti > --- > drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c b/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c

Re: [PATCH 4/4] fs: asus_atk0110: Fix DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE semicolon definition and use

2014-06-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > The DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE macro should not end in a ; > Fix the one use in the kernel tree that did not have a semicolon. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Acked-by: Luca Tettamanti For my driver only ;-) Luca > --- &

Re: sata NCQ blacklist entry

2007-11-08 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Nov 9, 2007 12:32 AM, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Florian La Roche wrote: > >>> Hello all, > >>> > >>> I've taki

Re: sata NCQ blacklist entry

2007-11-08 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Florian La Roche wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going > > into the kernel. > > This Fujitsu drive also gives me spurious command completions. Detailed > > output also availa

Regression: libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()

2007-11-03 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, latest git causes my extra disk controller to die with screaming interrupts. Picture here: http://img113.imageshack.us/my.php?image=im000708vj7.jpg The controller card is this one (SATA port is not in use): 05:02.0 Mass storage controller: ALi Corporation ALi M5281 Serial ATA / RAID Host Co

[PATCH] acpi4asus: add support for F3Sa

2007-11-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Add support for ASUS F3Sa notebook. Features: - LCD on/off - Brightness - Wifi kill - Bluetooth kill Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- There may be another method to read LCD status which doesn't require ad-hoc code, but I'm unable to find it. I'

Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git

2007-10-19 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 10/19/07, Christian Borntraeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier: > > Did you patch kvm.git with patch-2.6.23.1.bz2 or did you download > > linux-2.6.23.1.tar.bz2 ? > > > > 2.6.23.1 corrects nothing except sata_mv... > > Yes I know. The question we

Re: [bug] block subsystem related crash with latest -git

2007-10-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 07:29:32PM +0200, Jens Axboe ha scritto: > OK, it is fine, as long as the sglist is cleared initially. And I don't > think there's anyway around that, clearly I didn't think long enough > before including the memset() removal from Tomo. > > Ingo, please try this rolled up

Re: kexec: Cannot determine the file type of arch/x86/boot/bzImage

2007-10-16 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Sam, please take a look at this: Il Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:51:13PM +0200, Thomas Meyer ha scritto: > Look at this: > > $ file arch/x86/boot/bzImage (tree 821f3eff7cdb9d6c7076effabd46c96c322daed1) > arch/x86/boot/bzImage: Linux kernel x86 boot executable zImage, version > 2.6.23 ([EMAIL PROTECTE

Hitachi disk: spurious completions during NCQ

2007-10-10 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hello, sometimes kernel complains about spurious completions on my new notebook: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x407fd SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata3.00: spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0 SAct=0x407fd FIS=005040a1:0002 ata3.00: cmd 61/08:00:c7:5a:82/00:00:1b:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x

Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)

2007-10-04 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:32:44AM +0200, Frans Pop ha scritto: > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:27:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Fr

Re: [BUG] pata_ali not working on a 64 bit system

2007-09-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:01:36PM +0200, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto: > Il Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:44:02PM +0100, Alan Cox ha scritto: > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:36:05 +0200 > > Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I fou

Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc4: BAD regression

2007-08-29 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 01:29:56AM +0200, Daniel Ritz ha scritto: > tried that one on my old toshiba tecra 8000 laptop, almost killing it. > the fan doesn't work any more...type 'make' and see the box dying. > luckily my CPU doesn't commit suicide...bisected it to that one: > > cd8c93a4e04dce8f00

Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions

2007-08-13 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Michal Piotrowski ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc3. > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions [...] > > Subject : FATAL: drivers/acpi/video: sizeof(struct acpi_device_id)=20 > is n

Re: [PATCH 4/5] UML - Simplify helper stack handling

2007-08-05 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:37:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton ha scritto: > > So I'm running the generic version of this on i386 with 8k stacks (below), > with a quick LTP run. > > Holy cow, either we use a _lot_ of stack or these numbers are off: > > vmm:/home/akpm> dmesg -s 100|grep 'bytes left

Re: [PATCH] - SN: Add support for CPU disable

2007-07-31 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, I've a couple of comments on the patch: John Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Index: linux-2.6/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/huberror.c > === > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/huberror.c 2007-07-31 > 09:09:55.414522005

[2.6.22] edac: sleeping function called from invalid context

2007-07-14 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, as soon as I enable parity check on PCI bus (with polling - EDAC_POLL), the following warning is triggered: EDAC MC: Ver: 2.0.1 Jul 13 2007 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /home/kronos/src/linux-2.6.git/kernel/rwsem.c:20 in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1 INFO: lockdep is

Re: [PATCH] some kmalloc/memset ->kzalloc (tree wide)

2007-07-08 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > Transform some calls to kmalloc/memset to a single kzalloc (or kcalloc). [...] > diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/module.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/module.c > index bd03dc9..026ba9a 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/module.c > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/mod

[PATCH] Enable legacy support for serial ports when SERIAL_8250_PNP is disabled

2007-07-07 Thread Luca Tettamanti
covery. However if SERIAL_8250_PNP is not enabled the user is left without serial ports (been there, done that - my kernel config suddenly wasn't working anymore). So: Enable probing of serial ports using legacy code when PNP code (SERIAL_8250_PNP) is not enabled. Signed-off-by: Luca Tettama

Re: [BUG] pata_ali not working on a 64 bit system

2007-07-06 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:44:02PM +0100, Alan Cox ha scritto: > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:36:05 +0200 > Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I found out that pata_ali is not working with a 64 bit kernel, while a > > 32 bit kernel on the same

[BUG] pata_ali not working on a 64 bit system

2007-07-06 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hello, I found out that pata_ali is not working with a 64 bit kernel, while a 32 bit kernel on the same machine works fine. I'm running a very recent kernel (872aad45, somewhere after 2.6.22-rc7). The problem is that as soon as the module is loaded I get a screaming interrupt: (initramfs) modprob

Re: Does the kernel HPET support has problems or the hwclock from util-linux?

2007-07-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
rae l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > from this address, I know util-linux-2.12r is the latest: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/util-linux-2.12r.lsm > > My Dell OptiPlex 320 has 4 HPET timers and no RTC, so the execution of > hwclock has errors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ /sbi

[PATCH] atl1: disable 64bit DMA

2007-06-25 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 07:42:44AM -0500, Jay Cliburn ha scritto: > Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote: > >Jay Cliburn wrote: > > > >>For reasons not yet clear to me, it appears the L1 driver has a bug or > >>the device itself has trouble with DMA in high memory. This patc

[PATCH 1/2] kvm: Fix x86 emulator writeback

2007-06-19 Thread Luca Tettamanti
and perform the writeback stage in the emulation unless it's explicitly disabled (currently push and some 2 bytes instructions may disable the writeback). Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Tested with Fedora7, Solaris10 and WinXP on a 32 bit host with Intel CPU

[PATCH 2/2] kvm: avoid useless memory write when possible

2007-06-19 Thread Luca Tettamanti
When writing to normal memory and the memory area is unchanged the write can be safely skipped, avoiding the costly kvm_mmu_pte_write. Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Tested with Fedora7, Solaris10 and WinXP on a 32 bit host with Intel CPU. drivers/kvm/kvm_

Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: Fix x86 emulator writeback

2007-06-19 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:32:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > >Unfortunately, this kills Windows XP (first run with a guest crash, > >second with a host oops), so I reverted it. I'd guess some operation > >which doesn't need writeback ends up in the modified code. > >Previously, the che

[PATCH 1/2] kvm: Fix x86 emulator writeback

2007-06-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
and always perform the writeback stage in the emulation. Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c | 60 +++- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/kvm/x86_emulate.c b/drive

[PATCH 2/2] kvm: avoid useless memory write when possible

2007-06-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
When writing to normal memory and the memory area is unchanged the write can be safely skipped, avoiding the costly kvm_mmu_pte_write. Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 10:43:23AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > Il Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:06:50PM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > > > >>> After a bit of thinking: it's correct but removes an optimization; > >>> fur

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-15 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:06:50PM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > > After a bit of thinking: it's correct but removes an optimization; > > furthermore it may miss other instructions that write to memory mapped > > areas. > > A more proper fix should be "force the writeback if dst.ptr is in some >

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-14 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:53:24AM +0200, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto: > Il Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:26:29AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > >With GOOD_APIC apic_read_around is a nop, while apic_write_around is a > > >normal write. With !

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-14 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:26:29AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >With GOOD_APIC apic_read_around is a nop, while apic_write_around is a > >normal write. With !GOOD_APIC apic_write_around writes to the APIC reg > >using xchg. With !GOO

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-14 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:26:29AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >With GOOD_APIC apic_read_around is a nop, while apic_write_around is a > >normal write. With !GOOD_APIC apic_write_around writes to the APIC reg > >using xchg. With !GOO

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-13 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:59:25AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >Il Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:44:45AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > > > >>Luca wrote: > >> > >>>>I've managed to reproduce this on kvm-21 (it t

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-12 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:44:45AM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > Luca wrote: > >> > >>I've managed to reproduce this on kvm-21 (it takes many boots for this > >>to happen, but it does eventually). > > > >Hum, any clue on the cause? > > From what I've seen, it's the new Linux clocksource code.

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-04 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:51:10PM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > > While doing repeated tests with the installer I ran into another > > (unrelated) problem. Sometimes the guest kernel hangs at boot at: > > > > NET: Registered protocol family 2 > > > > with any kind of networking options (except

Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-04 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, Il Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:35:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >Hello, > >my kernel just exploded :) > > > >The host is running 2.6-git-current, with KVM modules from KVM-27 > >package. kernel is 32bit, SMP, with PREEMPT enab

[BUG] Oops with KVM-27

2007-06-03 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hello, my kernel just exploded :) The host is running 2.6-git-current, with KVM modules from KVM-27 package. kernel is 32bit, SMP, with PREEMPT enabled, no HIGHMEM (but I'm using CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT=y). The CPU is a Core2 (hence I'm using kvm-intel). Guest was a Fedora7 setup DVD, which died som

Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC] ACPI based hwmon driver for ASUS

2007-06-02 Thread Luca Tettamanti
AML code to read the rotation. This may be true also for the other packages (temp and voltage), but for now I've modified only the fan code. Here's another iteration of the driver, please give it a try: /* * Copyright (C) 2007 Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Distribute un

Re: radeonfb and X800 cards

2007-05-22 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Jimmy Jazz ha scritto: > @Luca, if i remember well you have a X850, could you please try the > patch for me ? It does work - sort of; BIOS parsing code is correct. It lacks the proper connector detection though (esp. port sharing). ATOM BIOS has a differe

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc2: known regressions with patches

2007-05-20 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Sun, May 20, 2007 at 12:06:42AM +0200, Michal Piotrowski ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc2 > with patches available. > > Cryptography > > Subject: cryptomgr oops > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm modesetting core

2007-05-18 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:04:54PM -0700, Jesse Barnes ha scritto: > On Thursday, May 17, 2007, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:37:45PM -0700, Jesse Barnes ha scritto: > > > This patch adds the core of the new DRM based modesetting system. > > >

Re: 2.6.21-mm1 and now 2.6.21-git: SLUB Crashes on boot - crypto?

2007-05-18 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:14:55PM +1000, Herbert Xu ha scritto: > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 02:09:54PM +0200, Luca wrote: > > > > Well, pretty sure. The OOPS says 2.6.22-rc1-libata-g705962cc-dirty, > > git agrees and I've done a full rebuild. The .config is generated > > using 'make oldconfig' usi

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm modesetting core

2007-05-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:37:45PM -0700, Jesse Barnes ha scritto: > This patch adds the core of the new DRM based modesetting system. A couple of comments on drm_fb since I'm somewhat familiar with fb code: > new file mode 100644 > index 000..0d06792 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/linux-core/drm_e

Re: 2.6.21-mm1 and now 2.6.21-git: SLUB Crashes on boot - crypto?

2007-05-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:43:44AM +1000, Herbert Xu ha scritto: > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:38:23PM +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > I'm running git 705962cc (which is a commit after -rc1) and I still see > > the OOPS on boot. The patch above is already applied though. Not

Re: 2.6.21-mm1 and now 2.6.21-git: SLUB Crashes on boot - crypto?

2007-05-15 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, May 15, 2007 at 11:43:44AM +1000, Herbert Xu ha scritto: > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:38:23PM +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > I'm running git 705962cc (which is a commit after -rc1) and I still see > > the OOPS on boot. The patch above is already applied though. Not

Re: 2.6.21-mm1 and now 2.6.21-git: SLUB Crashes on boot - crypto?

2007-05-14 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Kevin Winchester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On 5/9/07, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:58:09PM -0300, Kevin Winchester wrote: >> > >> > Not having any idea what I'm doing, I looked at cryptomgr_probe and >> > cryptomgr_notify, and can't seem to see much, e

[RFC] ACPI based hwmon driver for ASUS

2007-05-13 Thread Luca Tettamanti
cpi_get_object_info(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_buffer *return_buffer); I've asked for help to local LUG: the driver has been tested by a couple of people; unfortunately the board were all very similar (a P5B, a P5B delux and my P5B-E). If you have a recent ASUS mainboard and the driver doe

Re: [RFC][PATCH] VM: per-user overcommit policy

2007-05-07 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, a few comments on the patch: Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > diff -urpN linux-2.6.21/include/linux/mman.h > linux-2.6.21-vm-acct-user/include/linux/mman.h > --- linux-2.6.21/include/linux/mman.h 2007-05-07 20:20:24.0 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.21-vm-acct-user/include/linux

Re: [BUG? -rc7] SMP: Just one CPU activated: P4 3GHz HT

2007-04-27 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:11:52AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda ha scritto: > On 4/22/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Probably the two siblings are enumerated only in ACPI tables. If you > >disable ACPI the kernel won't be aware of the second "core".

Re: Back to the future.

2007-04-26 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 11:17 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> On 4/26/07, Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > * Mulithreaded I/O (might as well use multiple cores to compress the >> > image, now that we're hotplugging later). >> >> I assu

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-04-22 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:50:29AM +0200, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto: > >I'm sure you've seen these: > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-October/014050.html > > http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/AsusFormulaHacking > > Actually I haven'

Re: [BUG? -rc7] SMP: Just one CPU activated: P4 3GHz HT

2007-04-22 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Miguel Ojeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On 4/22/07, oliver pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have CC the kernel > > Did you? > >> and the result is: >> >> your'e config : failed smp >> >> your'e config + power managment : ok >> > > Interesting, can anyone tell me why does not SMP wor

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-04-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 4/17/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 16 April 2007 15:14, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Problem is that ACPI methods are not documented at all (how am I > supposed to know that "G6T6" is the reading of the 12V rail?) while the > datasheet of hw monit

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-04-16 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 06:57:02PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas ha scritto: > On Sunday 15 April 2007 14:59, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > On 4/15/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But I missed the details, such as the specific devices in question, > > > w

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-04-15 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 4/15/07, Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 15 April 2007 03:41, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:59:45 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Of course, there are always BIOS defects. But if we could make a > > case that a BIOS that doesn't declare the resources used by

Re: strange keyboard lag after suspend testing

2007-03-21 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Adding Thomas Gleixner to CC Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi! > >> > >> > I was testing suspend in 2.6.21-rc4 a lot, and now... machine feels >> > >> > like someone added 50..100msec delay somewhere in keyboard >> > >> > handling. Mouse does not seem affected. /proc/interrupts s

Re: [PATCH] pata_jmicron: remove spurious #endif

2007-03-05 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 3/5/07, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Hello, > commit 438ac6d5e3f8106a6bd1a5682c508d660294a85d causes a build failure: > > CC drivers/ata/pata_jmicron.o > /home/kronos/src/linux-2.6.git/drivers/ata/pata_jmicron.c:247:2: error

[BUG] check_tsc_sync_source: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code

2007-03-05 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi Ingo, git blame on tsc_sync.c points to you :) I'm running 2.6.21-rc2, with PREEMP and SMP. I've enabled both hrtimers and dyntick. CPU hotplug is also configured in (for swsusp). If I put CPU1 offline and bring it back I get the following notice: Breaking affinity for irq 1 Breaking affinity

[PATCH] pata_jmicron: remove spurious #endif

2007-03-03 Thread Luca Tettamanti
pata_jmicron driver. Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/ata/pata_jmicron.c |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_jmicron.c b/drivers/ata/pata_jmicron.c index 033319e..43763c9 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_jmicron.c +++ b/drive

Re: [BUG][2.6.21] af_key: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:93

2007-02-27 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 2/27/07, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 26-02-2007 23:08, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Hello, > I'm running 2.6.21 (current git, at 9654640d0af). kernel blows up at > startup, when running setkey. Kernel 2.6.20 runs fine. A couple of words ... >

Re: [BUG][2.6.21] af_key: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:93

2007-02-26 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:08:41PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto: > .config is attached. This time for real... This one is with INET_AH and INET_ESP enabled. Disabling them triggers the bug. Luca -- Se non puoi convincerli, confondili. # # Automatically generated make config: don

[BUG][2.6.21] af_key: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:93

2007-02-26 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hello, I'm running 2.6.21 (current git, at 9654640d0af). kernel blows up at startup, when running setkey. Kernel 2.6.20 runs fine. A couple of words on the config: I played a bit with IPSec a while ago, then removed AH/ESP (INET_AH and INET_ESP) from the kernel; NET_KEY was left enabled. I think th

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-22 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:01:52AM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > On 2/22/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:08 +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > >> > >> As mentioned in another post in this thread, I can't get any info out > >> of the i2c busses, b

Re: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1]

2007-02-21 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 2/22/07, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 00:04 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > Hi Thomas, > I'm testing NO_HZ on my machines. On the laptop I see that the timer > interrupt counter is incremented (though slower than HZ). This machine &g

NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1]

2007-02-21 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Ok, the merge window for 2.6.21 has closed, and -rc1 is out there. > > There's a lot of changes, as is usual for an -rc1 thing, but at least so > far it would seem that 2.6.20 has been a good base, and I don't think we > have anything *really* sca

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-02-20 Thread Luca Tettamanti
On 2/20/07, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:38:05PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > ACPI is broken here, not k8temp, so let's fix ACPI instead. ACPI > doesn't conflict with only k8temp, but with virtually all hardware > monitoring drivers, all I2C/SMBus drivers

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-17 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:25:41AM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > On 2/11/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Sorry for the delay. > > Ditto! > > It also seemed that my kernel compiling sk1llz had gone AWL, I > couldn't get the newly compi

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-11 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Sorry for the delay. Il Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:19:08AM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > On 2/8/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Il Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:22:00PM +, James Simmons ha scritto: > >> There is no stand alone nvidia card i2c driver.

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-07 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:28:36PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > On 2/5/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > get-edid uses the BIOS, while the other two talk directly over the I2C > > bus. > > > > Try loading i2c-dev (I2C_CHARDEV); With

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-07 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:22:00PM +, James Simmons ha scritto: > > > On 2/5/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > get-edid uses the BIOS, while the other two talk directly over the I2C > > > bus. > > > > > > Try loading i2c-

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-05 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:17:08PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > On 2/4/07, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Giuseppe, can you send me the EDID block of your monitor? > > I'd gladly do it, if I knew how to retrieve it ... because apparently, >

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-02-04 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:33:01PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto: > Il Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:37:22PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > > On 1/29/07, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Because most users won't even be aware of the mo

Re: [2.6.20-rc6] pktcdvd doesn't work

2007-02-01 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:30:44AM +0100, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:53:19PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > Hi, > > pktcdvd on kernel 2.6.20-rc6 is not working as expected. Any file that > > is written to the device is lost after umount. > &g

Re: [2.6.20-rc6] pktcdvd doesn't work

2007-01-31 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi Adrian, Il Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:10:13AM +0100, Adrian Bunk ha scritto: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 05:58:19AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Luca Tettamanti wrote: > > >Hi Jeff, linux-ide, > > >I'm having troubles with libata and UDF on RW media. See below. &g

Re: [2.6.20-rc6] pktcdvd doesn't work

2007-01-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi Jeff, linux-ide, I'm having troubles with libata and UDF on RW media. See below. Il Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:42:34PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt ha scritto: > On Jan 30 2007 21:36, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >Il Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:02:20PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt ha scritto: > &

Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] nvidiafb: allow ignoring EDID info

2007-01-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:37:22PM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta ha scritto: > On 1/29/07, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Because most users won't even be aware of the module option: they'll > > > > > just > > > > > know that their card doesn't work right. > > > > > > > > This isn't a

Re: [2.6.20-rc6] pktcdvd doesn't work

2007-01-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:02:20PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt ha scritto: > > On Jan 30 2007 20:53, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >Hi, > >pktcdvd on kernel 2.6.20-rc6 is not working as expected. Any file that > > Did it work previously? Yup, It used to work but since I rarely

[2.6.20-rc6] pktcdvd doesn't work

2007-01-30 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, pktcdvd on kernel 2.6.20-rc6 is not working as expected. Any file that is written to the device is lost after umount. I rarely use pktcdvd but at some point it used to work on my system. This is what I'm doing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# cdrwtool -d /dev/scd0 -q using device /dev/scd0 1029KB int

Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver

2007-01-23 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:25:22AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger ha scritto: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:00:04 +0100 > Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Il Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:33:39PM -0600, Jay Cliburn ha scritto: > > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > &

Re: [PATCH 4/4] atl1: Ancillary C files for Attansic L1 driver

2007-01-22 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:33:39PM -0600, Jay Cliburn ha scritto: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:07:37 -0600 Jay Cliburn wrote: > [snip] > > >>+ value = ioread16(hw->hw_addr + REG_PCIE_CAP_LIST); > >>+ return ((value & 0xFF00) == 0x6C00) ? 0 : 1; > > > >Are there defines or e

Re: .version keeps being updated

2007-01-09 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi all, Hi Jean, > Since 2.6.20-rc1 or so, running "make" always builds a new kernel with > an incremented version number, whether there has actually been any > change done to the code or configuration or not. This increases the > build time quite a

Re: JMicron JMB363 SATA hard disk appears twice (sda + hdg)

2007-01-06 Thread Luca Tettamanti
t want to use libata are cut off; but they can still use the controller in IDE mode, no? Alan, Jeff what do you think? jmicron: don't touch the controller when it's AHCI mode. As help text suggests ("For full support use the libata drivers") the new libata AHCI driver will tak

Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: add support for newer cards

2007-01-01 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto: > Hi Ben, Andrew, > I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20. > The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on > X.Org code. And - for an easie

[KVM][PATCH] smp_processor_id() and sleeping functions used in invalid context

2006-12-31 Thread Luca Tettamanti
allocation (vmx_vcpu_setup, vmx.c:1103) done inside get_cpu(). This first warning can be fixed by moving the cpu_to_node conversion. Not sure that it's correct though. Between vmx_create_vcpu() and vmx_vcpu_load() the CPU may change and the 'vmcs' may be actually on a differnt node, n

Re: [PATCH 0/4] atl1: Revised Attansic L1 ethernet driver

2006-12-14 Thread Luca Tettamanti
(I'm CC-ing the other developer) Il Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 03:44:43AM +, Vasco Visser ha scritto: > Hi, > > I've tested the new driver for a couple of days, mostly by running > XDMCP session over the Gbit LAN. Its all working good. > > I didn't experience any crashes or slowdowns at all. The

pata_ali: troubles with interrupt

2006-11-26 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hi, I have a "hamlet xsataci" card[1], which is basically a PCI card with both an Ali M5228 PATA controller and a M5281 SATA controller: 05:02.0 Mass storage controller: ALi Corporation ALi M5281 Serial ATA / RAID Host Controller (rev a4) 05:02.1 Mass storage controller: ALi Corporation M5228 ALi

Re: [PATCH 0/4] atl1: Revised Attansic L1 ethernet driver

2006-11-25 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Hello, Luca Tettamanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: >> >> I've been working on this with Jay since his initial submission. Thanks >> to everyone who has provided feedback on the resubmit. We're current