would be interesting if teher was also a document about XFS that is more
suitable for some kind of use, and maybe reiserFS...
>
> Nice three documents with many numbers:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/entry/now_available_three_new_solaris
>
> kloczek
> --
>
would be interesting if teher was also a document about XFS that is more
suitable for some kind of use, and maybe reiserFS...
Nice three documents with many numbers:
http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/entry/now_available_three_new_solaris
kloczek
--
While doing eavy I/O on a RAID1 logical volume with reiserfs with kernel
2.6.22-rc2 on Athlon64 3800+ X2, i got:
BUG: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
Call Trace:
[] __kmalloc+0xfa/0x110
[] compat_core_sys_select+0xd1/0x250
[] compat_sys_select+0xe5/0x190
[] sys_read+0x53/0x90
[]
While doing eavy I/O on a RAID1 logical volume with reiserfs with kernel
2.6.22-rc2 on Athlon64 3800+ X2, i got:
BUG: at mm/slab.c:777 __find_general_cachep()
Call Trace:
[8027eeba] __kmalloc+0xfa/0x110
[802b60f1] compat_core_sys_select+0xd1/0x250
[802b7bf5]
Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop
consequently), as you can see from:
pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.7
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max
Hi,
since upgrading to kernel 2.6.20 my pata disk, using new pata driver, is
initialized maximum in DMA33 mode (and obviously performances drop
consequently), as you can see from:
pata_amd :00:06.0: version 0.2.7
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:06.0 to 64
ata5: PATA max
) really
different.
Obviously I will be happy to make all the test you will ask me.
Luigi Genoni
On Thursday 01 September 2005 19:32, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:22:04PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > I should use as an USB gprs modem.
> > >
>
) really
different.
Obviously I will be happy to make all the test you will ask me.
Luigi Genoni
On Thursday 01 September 2005 19:32, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:22:04PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
I should use as an USB gprs modem.
Since it is possible to configure
HI,
there is a way that the kernel could cope with CPU Overheating Protection?
I am usng a Tyan MPX with Dual AthlonMP, but COP is configured to shutdown
the system toot early, when the temparature is still low.
lm_sensors 2.9.0 didn't help
Thanx in advance
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from
HI,
there is a way that the kernel could cope with CPU Overheating Protection?
I am usng a Tyan MPX with Dual AthlonMP, but COP is configured to shutdown
the system toot early, when the temparature is still low.
lm_sensors 2.9.0 didn't help
Thanx in advance
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Justin Guyett wrote:
>
> Problem: I don't like company policy
> Solution: Deal or get another job
Not so easy in every country.
For example in Italy the law called stauto dei lavoratori forbits workers
to change so easily.
>
>
> Peon: Help! I installed linux at work and
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Justin Guyett wrote:
Problem: I don't like company policy
Solution: Deal or get another job
Not so easy in every country.
For example in Italy the law called stauto dei lavoratori forbits workers
to change so easily.
Peon: Help! I installed linux at work and got
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, james rich wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote:
> >
> > > So it seems that even if JFS is less complete than XFS (no ACL, quotas
> > > for instance), and even if it is l
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote:
> Hi,
> From what I understand from Linus's mail to lkml, there is a difference
> between JFS and XFS:
> JFS doesn't require any modifications to existing code, its only an
> addition.
> XFS on the contrary is far more intrusive.
> So it seems
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote:
Hi,
From what I understand from Linus's mail to lkml, there is a difference
between JFS and XFS:
JFS doesn't require any modifications to existing code, its only an
addition.
XFS on the contrary is far more intrusive.
So it seems that even
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, james rich wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Luigi Genoni wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Yaacov Akiba Slama wrote:
So it seems that even if JFS is less complete than XFS (no ACL, quotas
for instance), and even if it is less robust (I don't know if it is, I
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
>the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I would have bet that power supply was erogating elettricity with a
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> Interesting but I wonder how much this helps someone that not already know what it
>is. Should not the ls manual also contain something that explains the meaning instead
>of just the mapping from bits to symbol.
>
> Do linux even support the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
Interesting but I wonder how much this helps someone that not already know what it
is. Should not the ls manual also contain something that explains the meaning instead
of just the mapping from bits to symbol.
Do linux even support the sticky
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of
the problem. It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I would have bet that power supply was erogating elettricity with a
discontinous
e policy).
> And it probably doesn't
> help that we are always fighting amongst ourselves over architecture,
> implementation and the such. An uneducated person reading over the archives
> would probably assume that Alan and Linus are ready to start hunting each
> other down
I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).
Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.
I usually do a little overvolt of
no.
here is a case when the fUD comes, not from M$, but from a newspaper
that should write facts.
I suppose they received some pression from M$, but if people read of a FUD
from a M$ employed, then they can guess what is going on, if it is a
newspaper usually telling facts in a correct way..
some pression from M$, but if people read of a FUD
from a M$ employed, then they can guess what is going on, if it is a
newspaper usually telling facts in a correct way...
The situation is going to be sad
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).
Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.
I usually do a little overvolt of
and Linus are ready to start hunting each
other down, and the articles they write would probably reflect this.
probable.
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
Those are normal unix permissions, and you can use them on every kind of
Unix FS, (at less i saw them on jfs, hfs, vxfs, xfs, reiserfs, ext2, ufs).
S is suid and sgid without execution bit.
T is stiky bit without any execution bit.
(I hope my english is correct)
Luigi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001,
Have you considered to change your dimm at all?
If they are bugged they should be under warranty.
Luigi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks,
> I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4" fan
>in the case. (real nice case).
>
> I
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Rick Hohensee wrote:
> >
> > > rtlinux by default
> > > no SMP
> > > SMP doesn't scale. If this fork comes, the smart maintainer
> > > will take the non-SMP fork.
> >
> > Depends on platform and bus. From reports, it seems to scale just fine on
> >
Works well for me, Athlon 1300 (200Mhz FSB).
Did you check your ram?
Luigi
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB)
>processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
>
> It is oppsing left and right.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> > > 8: A way to change kernel without rebooting. I have no diskdrive or
> > > cddrive in my laptop so I often do drastic things when I install a new
> > > distribution.
> >
> > Thats actually an incredibly hard problem to solve. The only people who
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
8: A way to change kernel without rebooting. I have no diskdrive or
cddrive in my laptop so I often do drastic things when I install a new
distribution.
Thats actually an incredibly hard problem to solve. The only people who do
this
Works well for me, Athlon 1300 (200Mhz FSB).
Did you check your ram?
Luigi
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB)
processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
It is oppsing left and right. I
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Rick Hohensee wrote:
rtlinux by default
no SMP
SMP doesn't scale. If this fork comes, the smart maintainer
will take the non-SMP fork.
Depends on platform and bus. From reports, it seems to scale just fine on
non-intel systems.
Have you considered to change your dimm at all?
If they are bugged they should be under warranty.
Luigi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4 fan
in the case. (real nice case).
I think it
Those are normal unix permissions, and you can use them on every kind of
Unix FS, (at less i saw them on jfs, hfs, vxfs, xfs, reiserfs, ext2, ufs).
S is suid and sgid without execution bit.
T is stiky bit without any execution bit.
(I hope my english is correct)
Luigi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alexander V. Bilichenko wrote:
>
> > Some tests that I have recently check out. kernel compiled with
> > 3.0 (2.4.5) function call: 100 iteration. 3% slower than
> > 2.95. test example - hash table add/remove - 4% slower
John Nilson wrote:
> 2: Compile time optimization options in Make menuconfig
I do not understand the point.
> 3: Lilo/grub config in make menuconfig
Unusefull and dangerous.
> 4: make bzImage && make modules && make modules install && cp
> arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/'uname -r'
> > no SMP
> > x86 only (and similar, e.g. Crusoe)
>
Is this a joke?
I hope it is.
Luigi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
Yes, but i followed its development till now, and those file are still
present, belive me, when i do compile latest versions.
I am doing beta test of it when i have time,
and i think i tried all versions from 2.7 times, sometimes sending bug
reports.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
no SMP
x86 only (and similar, e.g. Crusoe)
Is this a joke?
I hope it is.
Luigi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the
John Nilson wrote:
2: Compile time optimization options in Make menuconfig
I do not understand the point.
3: Lilo/grub config in make menuconfig
Unusefull and dangerous.
4: make bzImage make modules make modules install cp
arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/'uname -r' something inside
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alexander V. Bilichenko wrote:
Some tests that I have recently check out. kernel compiled with
3.0 (2.4.5) function call: 100 iteration. 3% slower than
2.95. test example - hash table add/remove - 4% slower (compiled
Yes, but i followed its development till now, and those file are still
present, belive me, when i do compile latest versions.
I am doing beta test of it when i have time,
and i think i tried all versions from 2.7 times, sometimes sending bug
reports.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
The point was that Stimits says that on its Red Hat 7.1 he has no
ldscripts directory, and so no files like elf_i386.x and so on.
I was just surprised, since i know thay are all necessary to /usr/bin/ld
to work.
Then he was alo wondering why he has
two libc
/lib/libc.so.6 and
ce of /lib/{uname -a}/,
> and if it exists, adding it to the boot disk ld.so.conf
I would not be so scared, if you set a LD_PRELOAD_LIBRARY to
/lib/libc.so.6, you willse any binary will run anyway, because it would be
too mutch
if the same libc stripped would not run library, and they HAVE to
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
> Luigi Genoni wrote:
> >
> > Again i am confused.
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld is linker at compilation time, at it works how i told in
> > second part
> > of my mail, (just try to compile it, it comes with binutils,
>
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
Luigi Genoni wrote:
Again i am confused.
/usr/bin/ld is linker at compilation time, at it works how i told in
second part
of my mail, (just try to compile it, it comes with binutils,
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils).
/lib/d-2.2
if some guy from red hat could explain what is going on.
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
The point was that Stimits says that on its Red Hat 7.1 he has no
ldscripts directory, and so no files like elf_i386.x and so on.
I was just surprised, since i know thay are all necessary to /usr/bin/ld
to work.
Then he was alo wondering why he has
two libc
/lib/libc.so.6 and
Luigi Genoni
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
> Luigi Genoni wrote:
> >
> > I do not know if this is a new filesystem hierarchy, it should not be,
> > at less untill lsb finishes all discussion (anyway it is similar to lsb
> > standard). Your mail is a little con
at runtime) anyway to load shared libraries is managed by
/lib/ld-2.XXX.so, using
the db created by ldconfig that uses /etc/ld.so.conf
as its configuration file.
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
/lib); \
SEARCH_DIR(/usr/i386-slackware-linux/lib);
(that is why you need to pass -L/usr/X11R6/lib to link X11 apps
at runtime) anyway to load shared libraries is managed by
/lib/ld-2.XXX.so, using
the db created by ldconfig that uses /etc/ld.so.conf
as its configuration file.
Luigi Genoni
Genoni
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
Luigi Genoni wrote:
I do not know if this is a new filesystem hierarchy, it should not be,
at less untill lsb finishes all discussion (anyway it is similar to lsb
standard). Your mail is a little confusing for me. Let's see if i can
clarify
Tried this too, but i have the feeling the kernel compiled with this gcc
3.0 is somehow slower. context switch is slower
no benchs (no time to make them) to sustain my feeling, just a feeling...
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Eric Lammerts wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Is it
Tried this too, but i have the feeling the kernel compiled with this gcc
3.0 is somehow slower. context switch is slower
no benchs (no time to make them) to sustain my feeling, just a feeling...
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Eric Lammerts wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Is it mean
try to delete those two modules, and repit
depmod -a
then try to load the modules.
ipchain and ipfwadm modules do have symbols inside that are confusing
depmode/modprobe dor dependency of actual netfilter modules.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Luigi Gen
Have you also compiled modules for ipchains and ipfwadm support??
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
> Wondering something..
> I ran insmod to bring up ip_tables.o and I received the following error:
>
> /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: unresolved
> symbol
Have you also compiled modules for ipchains and ipfwadm support??
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
Wondering something..
I ran insmod to bring up ip_tables.o and I received the following error:
/lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: unresolved
symbol
try to delete those two modules, and repit
depmod -a
then try to load the modules.
ipchain and ipfwadm modules do have symbols inside that are confusing
depmode/modprobe dor dependency of actual netfilter modules.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Luigi Genoni
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:14:01PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
> > > some strange behaviour of
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:14:01PM +0200, German Gomez Garcia wrote:
Hello,
I've running 2.4.5-ac15 for almost a day (22 hours) and I found
some strange behaviour of the kswap, at
r some days the errors came back (different files and directories,
> not the same). At this time it's not possible to shut it down because
> more than 5000 users use it at the moment. Anyway before doing a fsck again
> I'd like to solve the problem so that the system couldn't get corrup
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Daniel wrote:
> So without further ado here're the features I want to get rid of:
>
> i386, i486
> The Pentium processor has been around since 1995. Support for these older
> processors should go so we can focus on optimizations for the pentium and
> better processors.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Daniel wrote:
So without further ado here're the features I want to get rid of:
i386, i486
The Pentium processor has been around since 1995. Support for these older
processors should go so we can focus on optimizations for the pentium and
better processors.
Please, I
not possible to shut it down because
more than 5000 users use it at the moment. Anyway before doing a fsck again
I'd like to solve the problem so that the system couldn't get corrupted again.
exactly, that what I saw myself on the soon to get broken disk.
bests
Luigi Genoni
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> > I have scripts that ssh into large numbers of boxes, which are sometimes
> > down. The timeout for figuring out the box is down is over an hour. This is
> > just insane.
> >
> > Telnet and ftp behave similarly, or at least
I have the sound blaster 16 card on one of my athlon (on PIII i have
es1731), that has one isa slot on its MB.
It works well, but i do not use isapnp nor any pnp support is enabled
inside of the kernel.
running 2.4.5/2.4.6-pre2
Luigi
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colonel wrote:
> From: Colonel <[EMAIL
I have the sound blaster 16 card on one of my athlon (on PIII i have
es1731), that has one isa slot on its MB.
It works well, but i do not use isapnp nor any pnp support is enabled
inside of the kernel.
running 2.4.5/2.4.6-pre2
Luigi
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colonel wrote:
From: Colonel [EMAIL
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
I have scripts that ssh into large numbers of boxes, which are sometimes
down. The timeout for figuring out the box is down is over an hour. This is
just insane.
Telnet and ftp behave similarly, or at least tthey lasted
It does work very well for me with 2.4.5 and 2.4.6-pre2, both with or
without devfs, both if sound support has been statically linked or
compiled as module.
On 12 Jun 2001, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>
> [please be kind and Cc when replying]
>
> Has someone been able to get es1371 to actually
: I/O ports at 1040 [size=64]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Luigi Genoni
Unix System Manager Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa
72 matches
Mail list logo
