Em Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:06:20 +0800
"Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| On Dec 14, 2007 1:04 AM, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > Hi there,
| >
| > If I run:
| >
| > # modprobe pnc2000
| >
| > In a mach
e5 53 89 c3 8b 40 18 83 f8 01 75 07 03 4b 10 88 11 eb 17 83 f8
02 75 08 03 4b 10 66 89 11 eb 0a 83 f8 04 75 05 03 4b 10 <89> 11 f0 83 04 24 00
5b 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 89 d7 8b 55 08 56 89
EIP: [] simple_map_write+0x2a/0x34 [map_funcs] SS:ESP 0068:dc913db8
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
:24:16 santorini kernel: <0>Fatal exception: panic in 5 seconds
Is this a CentOS kernel? If so, you should report the problem to them:
http://bugs.centos.org/main_page.php
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
hat, I thought it was a
vanilla kernel.
Btw, I think it's important to release a new CFS backport patch
because maybe some distro is using it (Mandriva stable kernel is
using the CFS backport patch, but we didn't update to latest
version yet).
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
To unsubscri
Thanks,
Yes, I tested the 'sched: fix crash in sys_sched_rr_get_interval()'
one and it really fixes the problem.
Thanks a lot Ingo.
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Em Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:00:05 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
|
| * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| >
| >
| > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
| > >
| > > sched_rr_get_interval(1, NULL);
| >
|
ched_slice(struct cfs_rq *cf
u64 slice = __sched_period(cfs_rq->nr_running);
slice *= se->load.weight;
- do_div(slice, cfs_rq->load.weight);
+ if (likely(cfs_rq->load.weight))
+ do_div(slice, cfs_rq->load.weight);
return slice;
}
out the patch
| > below? Since you already check for duplication by address then adding
| > a check for by name too seems okay to me.
| >
| > bob
| >
| >
| > Prevent duplicate names being registered with clocksource. This also
| > eliminates the duplication of hpet clock registr
Em Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:36:55 -0300
"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| Em Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:46:08 +0200
| Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
|
| |
| | > typedef struct {
| | > int size;
| | > - struct semaphore sem;
| | >
Em 06 Aug 2007 21:32:29 +0200
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > I'll manage to test it then. Do you have a test-case or has any
| > suggestion?
|
| LTP has some simple test cases for
Em Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:25:02 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
|
| * Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > | hm, looks good to me but i'm wondering why this was a holdout for
| > | such a long time :-) Did you manage to test a
- down(¤t->mm->context.sem);
+ mutex_lock(¤t->mm->context.lock);
desc = current->mm->context.ldt;
desc = (void *)desc + (seg & ~7);
} else {
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static inline unsigned long get_segment_
b
- down(¤t->mm->context.sem);
+ mutex_lock(¤t->mm->context.lock);
desc = current->mm->context.ldt;
desc = (void *)desc + (seg & ~7);
} else {
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static inline unsigned long get_segment_
b
- down(¤t->mm->context.sem);
+ mutex_lock(¤t->mm->context.lock);
desc = current->mm->context.ldt;
desc = (void *)desc + (seg & ~7);
} else {
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static inline unsigned long get_segment_
b
- down(¤t->mm->context.sem);
+ mutex_lock(¤t->mm->context.lock);
desc = current->mm->context.ldt;
desc = (void *)desc + (seg & ~7);
} else {
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static inline unsigned long get_segment_
b
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c |1 +
arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c| 14 +++---
arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c |4 ++--
include/asm-i386/mmu.h|4 ++--
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 del
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/ldt.c| 14 +++---
arch/x86_64/kernel/ptrace.c |4 ++--
include/asm-x86_64/mmu.h|4 ++--
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-lcpt/arch/x86_64/
[PATCH]: Fix undefined reference to `cpu_of'
cpu_of() is defined inside a CONFIG_SMP #ifdef/#endif but called
by !CONFIG_SMP code.
This patch fixes that by creating a !CONFIG_SMP version of cpu_of().
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/kernel/s
Em Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:01:25 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| [Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino - Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 01:28:39PM -0300]
| | Em Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:14:05 +0400
| | Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
| |
| | | Pete, Luiz
| | |
| | | what ab
eturn -ENOMEM;
| + if (result == 0) {
| + result = -ENOMEM;
| + printk(KERN_ERR "%s couldn't create workqueue\n",
ftdi_elan_driver.name);
| + }
| + return result;
| }
I still the prefer the version I sent you yesterday. :) It
changes the minimal a
n result;
}
static void __exit ftdi_elan_exit(void)
PS: Please, don't remove people from the CC list (wait for them
to ask for that).
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
result);
destroy_workqueue(respond_queue);
goto err3;
}
"""
And you can change 'err1' to return 'result'.
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
to regenerate them will cause changes to the generated files to be
| lost).
I've asked Jon to drop the manpage patches, I won't work on m-i-t
tools anytime soon.
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
589635] [] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
[ 166.589734] ===
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
id point - Luiz, do you want to redo your patch or I can take a
| look at the SGML source myself.
Urgh, I didn't know that, sorry.
I can redo my patch, but shouldn't the manpages be removed from the
repository then?
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
-
To unsubscribe from this list: s
Signed-off-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/cafe.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/cafe.c
index 65f9bd3..5a20518 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/cafe.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/cafe.c
@@ -597,7 +597,8 @@ static int __devinit cafe_nand_pro
26 matches
Mail list logo
