recover
the instruction and continue execution normally instead of crashing.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
---
arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 100 +++-
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm
simple_strtoul() is obselete now, so using newer function kstrtoul()
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Signed-off-by: Vinay Kumar Rijhwani
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +--
mm/shmem.c | 11 +--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a
==
In order to remove these warnings, it seems harmless to modify
the signed ints with unsigned long as a fix of negation of -2147483648 in
signed int.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
---
arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3
p;id=9a47e9cff994f37f7f0dbd9ae23740d0f64f9fe6
These patches does memset on structure object to initialize 8 padding bytes,
which can be skipped by
adjusting structure members.
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang
---
include/uapi/sound/asound.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inser
ff-by: Manjeet Pawar
Reviewed-by: Akhilesh Kumar
---
v4->v5: Modified as per the suggestion from David Miller
and Eric, ip6_xmit calls are made without checking NULL np
pointer, so no need to explicitly check NULL np in
ip6_xmit and ping_v6_sendmsg.
net/ipv6/ip6_outp
From: Rohit Thapliyal
np NULL check doesn't seem required here as it shall never
be NULL anyways in inet6_sk(sk).
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Signed-off-by: David Miller
Reviewed-by: Akhilesh Kumar
---
v2->v3: Modified as per the suggestion from Davi
From: Rohit Thapliyal
np checked for NULL and then dereferenced. It should be modified
for NULL case.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa
Reviewed-by: Akhilesh Kumar
---
v1->v2: Modified as per the suggestion of Hannes
From: Rohit Thapliyal
np checked for NULL and then dereferenced. It should be modified
for NULL case.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
---
net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net
d otherwise.
--- Original Message ---
Sender : Stefano Stabellini
Date : Jun 24, 2016 01:00 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH] arm:swiotlb:keep disabled in default configuration
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2016 8:27 AM, "Manjeet Pawar" wrote:
> &
> > On Jun 23, 2016 8:27 AM, "Manjeet Pawar" wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Rohit Thapliyal
>> >
>> > swiotlb implementation not required to be enabled in arm and
>> > disabling it reduces uImage size by 16KB.
>> >
>>
>>
From: Rohit Thapliyal
swiotlb implementation not required to be enabled in arm and
disabling it reduces uImage size by 16KB.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Ajeet Kumar Yadav
---
arch/arm/Kconfig |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kco
.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Reviewed-by: Akhilesh Kumar
Reviewed-by: Ajeet Kumar Yadav
---
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |3 +++
arch/arm64/mm/init.c|3 ++-
include/linux/swiotlb.h |1 +
lib/swiotlb.c
>> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
>> This patch fixes this issue.
>>
>> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
>> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTKSZ - 1"
>> Since in Glibc-2.22, MINSIGSTKSZ is set t
850]
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16850
Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Signed-off-by: Rohit Thapliyal
---
v1 -> Changes in uapi overall header
v2 -> Changes done in arm64 headers
v3 -> Changes done in both uapi & arm64 headers
arch/arm64/in
>> This looks correct now. A few more points though:
>>
>> * My first thought would have been to do this by first defining the
>> two symbols before the #include, and then adding an #ifdef in
>> the generic file. Both approaches work though, any other opinions
>> on this?
>That's what I
bug.cgi?id=16850
Bugfix in Glibc-2.22:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/
sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/sigstack.h;h=8f2fb76e3e81734ef8a9cf9ae40daf4705
f31c35;hb=b763f6ae859ecea70a5dacb8ad45c71d5f667e2e
Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Sig
bug.cgi?id=16850
Bugfix in Glibc-2.22:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/
sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/sigstack.h;h=8f2fb76e3e81734ef8a9cf9ae40daf4705
f31c35;hb=b763f6ae859ecea70a5dacb8ad45c71d5f667e2e
Signed-off-by: Akhilesh Kumar
Signed-off-by: Manjeet Pawar
Sig
17 matches
Mail list logo
