Re: Should VLANs be devices or something else?

Hi, Ben Greear wrote: > > > > Should VLANs be devices or some other thing? > I found it to be the easiest way to implement things. It allowed > me to not have to touch any of layer 3, and I did not have to patch > any user-space program like ip or ifconfig. I faced the same issue when impleme

Re: Scheduling in interrupt BUG. [Patch]

Hi, This patch solved the problem. Should be ready for inclusion in 2.4. No more 'Scheduling in interrupt' under those conditions. Thanx for the thoughts, solution and the amazing speed. You guys are doing a really great job! I hope we can get the earlier mentioned NULL ptr in all_ppp_units list

Scheduling in interrupt BUG.

Hi Guys, Once upon a time on my x86 UP box, UP kernel 2.4.4, (64M ram, 260M swap) http://home.sch.bme.hu/~cell/.config I hit a reproducable "Scheduling in interrupt" BUG. Also reproduced with 128M ram and low memory pressure (first I suspected it is related to swapping) Running lots of pppd versi

2.4.3 oopses at lots of ppp sessions

Hi Guys, 2.4.3 (UP kernel UP machine, http://home.sch.bme.hu/~cell/.config) oopses when I start lots of pppd eth0 simultaneously. (I guess the problem is not pppoe specific, but I do not know exactly) The last pppd sighs: PPP: couldn't register device (-17) This is 2 oops not just 1... :51 lim