I'm having the same problem. I think it has to do with timer problems...
Does /sbin/hwclock --show freeze your box? It "sometimes" works on
mine, but it more often than not locks it hard (especially as user,
not root) with no hints in syslog or anywhere else as to what
happened. This is a
I'm having the same problem. I think it has to do with timer problems...
Does /sbin/hwclock --show freeze your box? It sometimes works on
mine, but it more often than not locks it hard (especially as user,
not root) with no hints in syslog or anywhere else as to what
happened. This is a
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6845
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-757515.html
Please consider reverting this patch in upstream.
Thank you for your time,
Marcos
On 4/23/07, Marcos Pinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/23/07, Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6845
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-757515.html
Please consider reverting this patch in upstream.
Thank you for your time,
Marcos
On 4/23/07, Marcos Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/23/07, Jan Beulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that all
I'm honestly not sure how to try what you suggested to try, since I'm
nothing even remotely close to a kernel geek and it was over my head.
However, I'd gladly test anything that you think would be worth
testing, if you would please put it in way that I could understand,
such as "change line
I'm honestly not sure how to try what you suggested to try, since I'm
nothing even remotely close to a kernel geek and it was over my head.
However, I'd gladly test anything that you think would be worth
testing, if you would please put it in way that I could understand,
such as change line 'foo'
f5081f5b2999f24034bd M drivers
bisect run success
Please let me know if there's more that I can do.
Thank you,
Marcos
On 4/21/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:34:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:30:59PM -0500, Marcos Pin
Please let me know if there's more that I can do.
Thank you,
Marcos
On 4/21/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:34:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:30:59PM -0500, Marcos Pinto wrote:
Yes, I just tried 2.6.20.3 with ACPI enabled and it booted
Yes, I just tried 2.6.20.3 with ACPI enabled and it booted perfectly.
I'm hoping this means you know what's wrong? :-)
Thanks again,
Marcos
On 4/20/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 07:47:13PM -0500, Marcos Pinto wrote:
> I'm not subscribed,
I'm not subscribed, so please personally CC me any answers/comments.
Thank you.
While booting, (AMD64 Turion x2) 2.6.20.7 kernel locks up hard. The
last kernel that I tried, 2.6.18.8, worked perfectly without any
trickery. 2.6.20.7 only boots up with "acpi=off" being added to the
kernel line.
I'm not subscribed, so please personally CC me any answers/comments.
Thank you.
While booting, (AMD64 Turion x2) 2.6.20.7 kernel locks up hard. The
last kernel that I tried, 2.6.18.8, worked perfectly without any
trickery. 2.6.20.7 only boots up with acpi=off being added to the
kernel line.
Yes, I just tried 2.6.20.3 with ACPI enabled and it booted perfectly.
I'm hoping this means you know what's wrong? :-)
Thanks again,
Marcos
On 4/20/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 07:47:13PM -0500, Marcos Pinto wrote:
I'm not subscribed, so please personally
12 matches
Mail list logo
