On 28/11/2018 17:10, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:56:51PM +0100, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
>>
>> If you still see the errors, at least the Ubuntu-kernel could be ruled out.
>
> My impression is that some of the people reporting problems have been
> using stock upstream kernels,
On 28/11/2018 17:10, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:56:51PM +0100, Rainer Fiebig wrote:
>>
>> If you still see the errors, at least the Ubuntu-kernel could be ruled out.
>
> My impression is that some of the people reporting problems have been
> using stock upstream kernels,
On 28/11/2018 05:15, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:16:33AM +0300, Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote:
>> Corrupted inodes - always directory, not touched at least year or
>> more for writing. Something wrong when updating atime?
I've just seen the errors come back despite having MQ
On 28/11/2018 05:15, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:16:33AM +0300, Andrey Jr. Melnikov wrote:
>> Corrupted inodes - always directory, not touched at least year or
>> more for writing. Something wrong when updating atime?
I've just seen the errors come back despite having MQ
On 27/11/2018 15:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
You might try to see if you have CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=yes in your kernel
config. Starting with 4.19.1 it somehow
interferes with ext4 and causes problems similar to the ones you list below.
Ever since I disabled MQ (either recompile
your kernel or
On 27/11/2018 15:32, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
You might try to see if you have CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=yes in your kernel
config. Starting with 4.19.1 it somehow
interferes with ext4 and causes problems similar to the ones you list below.
Ever since I disabled MQ (either recompile
your kernel or
Hi,
Attached is a tarball with the log of the event, a config used for the
kernel and dmesg output for overview of what the machine is. The BUG ocurred
while XFree 4 was running, the swap wasn't allocated at all, half of the
machine's memory was free. BUG ocurred two times, the second time it
Hi,
Attached is a tarball with the log of the event, a config used for the
kernel and dmesg output for overview of what the machine is. The BUG ocurred
while XFree 4 was running, the swap wasn't allocated at all, half of the
machine's memory was free. BUG ocurred two times, the second time it
** On Sep 19, Marty Fouts scribbled:
> Gene did the instruction set architecture along with some others. I think he
> was also involved in the i/o architecture.
Marty, could you _please_ stop posting to this thread on lkml and _PLEASE_
learn how to snip messages and _DON'T_ quote everything you
** On Sep 19, Marty Fouts scribbled:
Gene did the instruction set architecture along with some others. I think he
was also involved in the i/o architecture.
Marty, could you _please_ stop posting to this thread on lkml and _PLEASE_
learn how to snip messages and _DON'T_ quote everything you
** On Sep 05, Jeff V. Merkey scribbled:
> > > Linux is more buggy than NT, but at least the source code comes with it
> > > so there's no excuse for not getting soeone to fix it
> > Excuse me for adding my irrelevant 0.2$ - but what are you doing with Linux
> > then?? Why don't you just
** On Sep 05, Jeff V. Merkey scribbled:
>
> Linux is more buggy than NT, but at least the source code comes with it
> so there's no excuse for not getting soeone to fix it
Excuse me for adding my irrelevant 0.2$ - but what are you doing with Linux
then?? Why don't you just stick with NT
** On Sep 05, Jeff V. Merkey scribbled:
Linux is more buggy than NT, but at least the source code comes with it
so there's no excuse for not getting soeone to fix it
Excuse me for adding my irrelevant 0.2$ - but what are you doing with Linux
then?? Why don't you just stick with NT and
** On Sep 05, Jeff V. Merkey scribbled:
Linux is more buggy than NT, but at least the source code comes with it
so there's no excuse for not getting soeone to fix it
Excuse me for adding my irrelevant 0.2$ - but what are you doing with Linux
then?? Why don't you just stick with NT
14 matches
Mail list logo
