On 04/05/2018 03:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Marian Marinov <ker...@kyup.com> writes:
>
>> On 04/04/2018 07:02 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Angel Shtilianov <ker...@kyup.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Currently the same boot_id is r
On 04/05/2018 03:35 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Marian Marinov writes:
>
>> On 04/04/2018 07:02 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Angel Shtilianov writes:
>>>
>>>> Currently the same boot_id is reported for all containers running
>>>> on a
ernel/utsname.c
>> +++ b/kernel/utsname.c
>> @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ static struct uts_namespace *create_uts_ns(void)
>> struct uts_namespace *uts_ns;
>>
>> uts_ns = kmalloc(sizeof(struct uts_namespace), GFP_KERNEL);
>> -if (uts_ns)
>> +if (uts_ns) {
>> kref_init(_ns->kref);
>> +memset(uts_ns->sysctl_bootid, 0, 16);
>> +}
>> return uts_ns;
>> }
>
--
Marian Marinov
Co-founder & CTO of Kyup.com
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
IRQ: 7556201
IRC: hackman @ irc.freenode.net
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
sysctl_bootid[16];
>> } __randomize_layout;
>> extern struct uts_namespace init_uts_ns;
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/utsname.c b/kernel/utsname.c
>> index 913fe4336d2b..f1749cdcd341 100644
>> --- a/kernel/utsname.c
>> +++ b/kernel/utsname.c
>> @@
On 05/05/2015 02:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, May 02, 2015 11:27:32 PM Marian Marinov wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I have Lenovo T520 with one SSD and one SATA drive.
>>
>> I tried to upgrade to Linux 4.0 and found that after suspend and resume I
>> can
On 05/05/2015 02:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, May 02, 2015 11:27:32 PM Marian Marinov wrote:
Hi guys,
I have Lenovo T520 with one SSD and one SATA drive.
I tried to upgrade to Linux 4.0 and found that after suspend and resume I
can't access the second (SATA) drive.
Both
Hi guys,
I have Lenovo T520 with one SSD and one SATA drive.
I tried to upgrade to Linux 4.0 and found that after suspend and resume I can't
access the second (SATA) drive.
Both drives have bios encryption enabled.
I did a bisect and found that the following patch causes the issue:
commit
Hi guys,
I have Lenovo T520 with one SSD and one SATA drive.
I tried to upgrade to Linux 4.0 and found that after suspend and resume I can't
access the second (SATA) drive.
Both drives have bios encryption enabled.
I did a bisect and found that the following patch causes the issue:
commit
Hi Aleksa,
would you be willing to put your patches online in a repo like what Dwight
Engen did 3 years ago.
https://github.com/dwengen/linux/tree/cpuacct-task-limit-3.14
I'm using his patchset for more then a year now. However I would be happy to
experiment with your patches as well.
And
Hi Aleksa,
would you be willing to put your patches online in a repo like what Dwight
Engen did 3 years ago.
https://github.com/dwengen/linux/tree/cpuacct-task-limit-3.14
I'm using his patchset for more then a year now. However I would be happy to
experiment with your patches as well.
And
On 03/04/2015 05:48 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 4. März 2015, 15:18:19 schrieb Marian Marinov:
>
> Hi Marian,
>
>> Hello,
>> we are running hundreds of containers and we got some valid requests
> >from customers that want to be able to change their
Hello,
we are running hundreds of containers and we got some valid requests from
customers that want to be able to change their
container's hostname using the sysctl command.
The current implementation does not allow each UTS namespace to change its own
hostname.
So we sponsored the
On 03/04/2015 05:48 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 4. März 2015, 15:18:19 schrieb Marian Marinov:
Hi Marian,
Hello,
we are running hundreds of containers and we got some valid requests
from customers that want to be able to change their container's
hostname using the sysctl
Hello,
we are running hundreds of containers and we got some valid requests from
customers that want to be able to change their
container's hostname using the sysctl command.
The current implementation does not allow each UTS namespace to change its own
hostname.
So we sponsored the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/2014 02:52 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [More people to CC] On Tue 10-06-14 14:35:02, Marian Marinov wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
>> a wh
some tasks)
the load drops down to 25 within 5 to
7 minutes.
I read the whole thread from 2012 but I do not see the expected behavior that
is described by the people that
commented the issue.
In this case, with real usage for this patch, would it be considered for
inclusion?
Marian
- --
Marian
some tasks)
the load drops down to 25 within 5 to
7 minutes.
I read the whole thread from 2012 but I do not see the expected behavior that
is described by the people that
commented the issue.
In this case, with real usage for this patch, would it be considered for
inclusion?
Marian
- --
Marian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/2014 02:52 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[More people to CC] On Tue 10-06-14 14:35:02, Marian Marinov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Hi,
a while back in 2012 there was a request for this functionality. oom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2014 08:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Serge Hallyn writes:
>
>> Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
>>> On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>>> Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2014 08:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com writes:
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xe...@parallels.com):
On 05/29/2014 07:32 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
We are not using NFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Marian Marinov writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have the following proposition.
>>
>> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
creating the user_ns and free it in exit_creds().
Can you please comment on that?
Or suggest a better solution?
Best regards,
Marian
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
creating the user_ns and free it in exit_creds().
Can you please comment on that?
Or suggest a better solution?
Best regards,
Marian
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Marian Marinov m...@1h.com writes:
Hello,
I have the following proposition.
Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
namespace. The problem I'm facing
creating the user_ns and free it in exit_creds().
Can you please comment on that?
Or suggest a better solution?
Best regards,
Marian
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
creating the user_ns and free it in exit_creds().
Can you please comment on that?
Or suggest a better solution?
Best regards,
Marian
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On 05/25/2014 11:01 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi Marian,
>
> On 05/22/2014 03:01 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/05/2014 10:59 PM, Marian Marinov
ed, but it works.
I'm considering fixing some of the issues at has for use in my home setup.
Marian
> Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a
> message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majord
/
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlOCgOwACgkQ4mt9JeIbjJSXrgCdHCFADxvKN3Hxb4qinc/5Fj6V
WYMAnArk3Zb8YqTUNoyNCh1zYplUUx9B
=y/Sm
-END PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On 05/25/2014 11:01 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
Hi Marian,
On 05/22/2014 03:01 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2014 10:59 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
In my tests it worked exactly
block device to appear. That user doesn't need
>> permission to mount it
>
> Interesting point. This would further suggest that we absolutely must ensure
> that a loop device which shows up in
> the container does not also show up in the host.
Can I suggest the usage of the device
-kernel in
the body of a message to
majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
; - if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) ||
> capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) || +
> ns_capable(disk_to_dev(lo->lo_disk)->ns,
> CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) err = loop_set_capacity(lo, bdev); break; default:
>
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder &
nel" in the body of a message to
> majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at
> http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2014 10:59 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
> On 05/04/2014 02:17 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>> Hi Marian,
>>
>> Note: The limits will soon be increased to (nearly) ULONG_MAX. I.e.: If you
>> propose the patch because you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/05/2014 10:59 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
On 05/04/2014 02:17 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
Hi Marian,
Note: The limits will soon be increased to (nearly) ULONG_MAX. I.e.: If you
propose the patch because you are
running into issues with a too
the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlN+tg4ACgkQ4mt9JeIbjJRGkgCgjnD2s+J9kIr5oEDeL3VKHNvX
=
-EPERM; - if ((mode FMODE_WRITE) ||
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + if ((mode FMODE_WRITE) || +
ns_capable(disk_to_dev(lo-lo_disk)-ns,
CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) err = loop_set_capacity(lo, bdev); break; default:
- --
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk
AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 01:48 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
When we are creating new IPC namespace that should be cloned from the current
namespace it is a good idea to copy the
values of the current shmmax and shmall to the new namespace.
The idea sounds reasonable
AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 01:48 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
When we are creating new IPC namespace that should be cloned from the current
namespace it is a good idea to copy the
values of the current shmmax and shmall to the new namespace.
The idea sounds reasonable
On 05/04/2014 04:20 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 03:28 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
On 05/04/2014 02:53 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 01:48 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
When we are creating new IPC namespace that should be cloned from the current
On 05/04/2014 04:20 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 03:28 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
On 05/04/2014 02:53 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 01:48 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
When we are creating new IPC namespace that should be cloned from the current
On 05/04/2014 02:53 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 01:48 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
When we are creating new IPC namespace that should be cloned from the current
namespace it is a good idea to copy the
values of the current shmmax and shmall to the new namespace.
Why
ns->shm_ctlmax = init_ipc_ns.shm_ctlmax;
+ ns->shm_ctlall = init_ipc_ns.shm_ctlall;
+ }
ns->shm_ctlmni = SHMMNI;
ns->shm_rmid_forced = 0;
ns->shm_tot = 0;
--
1.8.4
--
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...
-shm_ctlmax = init_ipc_ns.shm_ctlmax;
+ ns-shm_ctlall = init_ipc_ns.shm_ctlall;
+ }
ns-shm_ctlmni = SHMMNI;
ns-shm_rmid_forced = 0;
ns-shm_tot = 0;
--
1.8.4
--
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359
On 05/04/2014 02:53 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 01:48 +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
When we are creating new IPC namespace that should be cloned from the current
namespace it is a good idea to copy the
values of the current shmmax and shmall to the new namespace.
Why
On 04/30/2014 03:01 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:51:54PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:22:55PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Marian Marinov wrote
On 04/30/2014 01:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 04/29/2014 03:29 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (mm-108mbtlg...@public.gmane.org):
On 04/30/2014 01:02 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (mm-108mbtlg...@public.gmane.org):
On 04/29/2014 09:52 PM, Serge Hallyn
On 04/30/2014 01:02 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
On 04/29/2014 09:52 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (ty...@mit.edu):
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:49:14PM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable
On 04/29/2014 09:52 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (ty...@mit.edu):
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:49:14PM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE)
check with ns_capable(current_cred()->user_ns, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTA
--
1.8.4
--
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://v
--
Marian Marinov
Founder CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hack...@jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
Mobile: +359 886 660 270
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 04/29/2014 09:52 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (ty...@mit.edu):
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:49:14PM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE)
check with ns_capable(current_cred()-user_ns, CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE
On 04/30/2014 01:02 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
On 04/29/2014 09:52 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Theodore Ts'o (ty...@mit.edu):
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 04:49:14PM +0300, Marian Marinov wrote:
I'm proposing a fix to this, by replacing the capable
On 04/30/2014 01:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 04/29/2014 03:29 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (mm-108mbtlg...@public.gmane.org):
On 04/30/2014 01:02 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (mm-108mbtlg...@public.gmane.org):
On 04/29/2014 09:52 PM, Serge Hallyn
Marinov m...@1h.com wrote:
On 04/30/2014 01:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 04/29/2014 03:29 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (mm-108mbtlg...@public.gmane.org):
On 04/30/2014 01:02 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Marian Marinov (mm-108mbtlg...@public.gmane.org):
On 04/29
Hello,
I'm maintaining a few patches out of the main tree.
Currently I keep one repository that is a clone of this:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
But if I'm monitoring the 3.13 version I can see only the rc versions in that
repository.
Which repository
Hello,
I'm maintaining a few patches out of the main tree.
Currently I keep one repository that is a clone of this:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
But if I'm monitoring the 3.13 version I can see only the rc versions in that
repository.
Which repository
On 01/13/2014 07:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Marian Marinov wrote:
Hello Peter,
I need help with the scheduler.
I'm currently trying to patch the /proc/loadavg to show the load that is
only related to the processes from the current cgroup.
I looked
On 01/13/2014 07:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Marian Marinov wrote:
Hello Peter,
I need help with the scheduler.
I'm currently trying to patch the /proc/loadavg to show the load that is
only related to the processes from the current cgroup.
I looked
60 matches
Mail list logo
