Re: "Hyper-Mount" option possible???

2000-11-24 Thread Mark W. McClelland
Robert L Martin wrote: > > Not on list just throwing an idea out. > One thing that "bugs" me is if a given drive has more than one partion > each partion has to be mounted seperatly. > With CDs this also means you can not mount "split" cds in full if you > want to. Soo Given that Super-Mount is

Re: Hyper-Mount option possible???

2000-11-24 Thread Mark W. McClelland
Robert L Martin wrote: Not on list just throwing an idea out. One thing that "bugs" me is if a given drive has more than one partion each partion has to be mounted seperatly. With CDs this also means you can not mount "split" cds in full if you want to. Soo Given that Super-Mount is

Re: Installing kernel 2.4

2000-11-09 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: > > The kernel isn't going non-ELF. Too painful, for dubious advantages, > > namely: > > > > perhaps we should extend ELF. After all, where linux goes, gcc > follows I would like to see some features added to ELF. Resource binding support would be nice, i.e.

Re: Installing kernel 2.4

2000-11-09 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Jeff V. Merkey" wrote: The kernel isn't going non-ELF. Too painful, for dubious advantages, namely: perhaps we should extend ELF. After all, where linux goes, gcc follows I would like to see some features added to ELF. Resource binding support would be nice, i.e. bitmaps used

Re: kmalloc() allocation.

2000-10-30 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > Hello, > How much memory would it be reasonable for kmalloc() to be able > to allocate to a module? > > Oct 30 10:48:31 chaos kernel: kmalloc: Size (524288) too large > > Using Version 2.2.17, I can't allocate more than 64k! I need > to allocate at least 1/2

Re: kmalloc() allocation.

2000-10-30 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: Hello, How much memory would it be reasonable for kmalloc() to be able to allocate to a module? Oct 30 10:48:31 chaos kernel: kmalloc: Size (524288) too large Using Version 2.2.17, I can't allocate more than 64k! I need to allocate at least 1/2 megabyte

Re: cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-21 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote: > > > From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? > > 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke > several USB drivers, including cpia USB. > > Should be fixed

Re: cpia_usb cameras

2000-10-21 Thread Mark W. McClelland
"Dunlap, Randy" wrote: From: John M. Flinchbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] did something change in the past 2 months to break cpia_usb cameras? 2.4.0-test9 (and maybe test8) had some significant changes that broke several USB drivers, including cpia USB. Should be fixed in