Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breakingbug exploits

On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mark Zealey wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Dan Hollis wrote: > > > > > > > On

Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breakingbug exploits

ne (and that's the only way how this > patch could give any protection)... Well, scratch "get real", I've got a > nice bridge for sale. That's a bit OTT, no? ;) > > > -- Mark Zealey (aka JALH on irc.openprojects.net: #zealos and many more) [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [RFC] prevention of syscalls from writable segments, breaking bugexploits

stupid. you'll never have a completly bug-free kernel, and they'll always be programs that will be faults, this is just a safety net against poor programming. As I said above, if you dont like it, just trun if off, for those that would like not to be r00ted via poorly written program