Hi all!
Since I upgraded my Alpha-Server (digital alpha/ 21164A 366 MHz, system type
alcor, 128 MB RAM) to Kernel version 2.4.2 (from 2.4.0) (2.4 gives it a real
performance boost, well done!), i notice system freezes. They happened four
times during the last 2 days and i think it happens when a
octave klaba wrote:
>
> >
>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre17/VM-global-2.2.18pre17-7.bz2
> > > eth0: card reports no resources
> > > VFS: file-max limit 4096 reached
> > > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list corrupted.
> > > Kernel panic: VFS: LRU block list corrupted
"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote:
>
> First of all, I'd like to say that I'm not writing this to piss anyone off.
> It's not a flame, a troll, or a personal attack on anyone. I my writing will
> aid in the improvement of Linux. Please read this with as much neutrality as
> you can summon.
I th
:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:13:48PM +0200, Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
> > HI all
> >
> > I received and discussed Processor-affinity on the SMP-Kernel-list and I
> > only wanted to ask if there is something in preparation or if someone
> > (especially Linus :))
HI all
I received and discussed Processor-affinity on the SMP-Kernel-list and I
only wanted to ask if there is something in preparation or if someone
(especially Linus :)) is against this ... I was asked this question
beacause someone wanted to do some Matrix-Operations on his SMP machine
and wna
"Mike A. Harris" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> >> > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >
> >> > > Why Intel chose family 15 is still beyond me though.
> >
> >> > IV is 15 if you just translate th
Hi!
has someone included detection support for P4 already (following P4
manuals on intel developer web site)?
If not I did, but as it is my first attempt in kernel hacking im not
sure if I did everything. Mainly it should not be a big deal... someone
has a few hints?? I edited processor.h and se
Hi
I don´t know if it has been fixed in 2.4.0-test10-pre but on alpha
there´s a little mistake in inlude/asm-alpha/fcntl.h:
#define F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE 1024
is missing. This prevents alpha from compiling. I added it till now
everything seems OK.
Do I need do make a patch or can someone fix it
Markus Pfeiffer wrote:
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:43:33AM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Btw, reading the ATA/ATAPI-6 specs I think UDMA66 should work on a
> setup where would be just one drive and a really short, 40-wire cable
> without problem
Hi,
one of the easiest ways of fixing this problem is probably using modules
and declaring eth0 and eth1 in conf.modules (or was it modules.conf ...
) ...
Markus
Florent Cueto wrote:
>
> I got the same problem.
> The consequence was that if my eth0 card (static ip) was "ifupped" before my
> et
10 matches
Mail list logo