Re: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711

2000-10-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Christoph Simon wrote: [] > kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711! [] > prepare such an event to make it reproducible. In both cases, please > CC to me, as I'm not on this list. If you look at the lkml archives at http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/, for example, you see this same thread

Re: kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711

2000-10-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Christoph Simon wrote: [] kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711! [] prepare such an event to make it reproducible. In both cases, please CC to me, as I'm not on this list. If you look at the lkml archives at http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/, for example, you see this same thread every

Re: kernel 2.4.0-test8 lockup

2000-09-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Donn Washburn wrote: > > I would request a "cc" message. > > It seems as recent I have either a memory problem and or possible > kernel problem with this system. System is a ASUS P5A, AMD K6-II/350 > 128Meg/IDE system. Don't use test8! It is known for cannibalism (particularly for eating

Re: kernel 2.4.0-test8 lockup

2000-09-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Donn Washburn wrote: I would request a "cc" message. It seems as recent I have either a memory problem and or possible kernel problem with this system. System is a ASUS P5A, AMD K6-II/350 128Meg/IDE system. Don't use test8! It is known for cannibalism (particularly for eating

Re: 2.4.0-test8: BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711

2000-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
"Udo A. Steinberg" wrote: > > Steffen Luitz wrote: > > > > 2.4.0-test8's kupdate just crashed with a BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711 when I > > was trying to save a file from StarOffice. The system is a Dual PII-300 > > (with SMP ...) > > Al Viro posted a patch to fix this problem earlier today on this

Re: 2.4.0-test8: BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711

2000-09-10 Thread Martin Costabel
"Udo A. Steinberg" wrote: Steffen Luitz wrote: 2.4.0-test8's kupdate just crashed with a BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:711 when I was trying to save a file from StarOffice. The system is a Dual PII-300 (with SMP ...) Al Viro posted a patch to fix this problem earlier today on this list. Where

Re: [Danger] Re: test8-pre4: innd fixed?

2000-09-05 Thread Martin Costabel
Simon Kirby wrote: > There is something definitely now even more broken with test8pre4. > > I just upgraded to test8pre4 from test7 and was reading this and some > other emails with mutt. Upon quiting mutt, mutt reported that there was > some sort of error while attempting to write the folder.