On Dec 1, 2007 7:50 PM, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by operationally transparent? It would be transparent
> for the updating client, and the rest of the git-users would need to wait
> for the commit from the updating client; which is ok, as this transparency
> is
On 6/19/07, Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I think would be particularly interesting in this domain is
something similar in concept to GIT, except in a file-system:
perhaps stating the blindingly obvious, but there was an early
implementation of a FUSE-based gitfs --
http://www.sf
On 2/26/07, Marco Costalba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S: There is also a Qt4 version (works under Windows) downloadable
from git://repo.or.cz/qgit4.git it is a little bit experimental
tough.
Is the QT4 Windows port working against the MinGW port of GIT?
cheers.
martin
-
To unsubscribe fro
3 matches
Mail list logo