On Monday 23 December 2013 12:01:06 Liam Lindholm wrote:
> Dear fellow Linux kernel hackers:
>
> It has come to my attention that Richard M. Stallman, founder of the
> Free Software Foundation and creator of the GNU project, has once
> again set out to fragment our grassroots community.
>
>
On Monday 23 December 2013 12:01:06 Liam Lindholm wrote:
Dear fellow Linux kernel hackers:
It has come to my attention that Richard M. Stallman, founder of the
Free Software Foundation and creator of the GNU project, has once
again set out to fragment our grassroots community.
Recently,
On Friday 28 December 2012 20:53:10 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:05 +0100, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > Since the release of 3.7 my main computer has been panicking a couple of
> > times on both 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 because of a 'dma
On Friday 28 December 2012 20:53:10 Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 20:05 +0100, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
Hi list,
Since the release of 3.7 my main computer has been panicking a couple of
times on both 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 because of a 'dma_map_area overflow xx bytes
Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]
(rev a1)
03:07.0 Multimedia controller: Twinhan Technology Co. Ltd Mantis DTV PCI Bridge
Controller [Ver 1.0] (rev 01)
Please tell, if more info is needed.
Regards,
Martin Nybo Andersen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]
(rev a1)
03:07.0 Multimedia controller: Twinhan Technology Co. Ltd Mantis DTV PCI Bridge
Controller [Ver 1.0] (rev 01)
Please tell, if more info is needed.
Regards,
Martin Nybo Andersen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Friday 24 August 2012 20:59:33 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > I want to use *my* old machines (hey, I payed for them) on whatever new
> > hardware I can plug into them. I'm not an oracle and can't see into the
> > future, however USB has
On Friday 24 August 2012 20:18:49 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > That's right, but new hardware, that I wish to use with the old machines
> > might
> > not because of no backporting of new drivers. Same goes for new software
> > util
On Friday 24 August 2012 19:05:53 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > What I'd hate even more is rendering my old working hardware useless by
> > removing x86-32 support from the kernel. To reason the removal by saying
> > "Microsoft plans
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:24:16 Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 10:14 AM, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > (And I'm still not sure why one would run 32-bit applications on a 64-bit
> > architecture...)
>
> There are several architectures (powerpc comes to mind) whe
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:17:14 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> > Ahh..., so the development time saved by not supporting x86-32 in
> > mainline can
> > now be used by backporting new features to the forementioned long term
> > tr
On Friday 24 August 2012 17:55:08 wbrana wrote:
> On 8/24/12, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > You really think that there are no 32bit x86-compatible CPUs in the
> > embedded world?
>
> x86-32 would be supported by long term tree until all x86-32 CPU disappear
Ahh..., so the development time saved
On Friday 24 August 2012 17:55:08 wbrana wrote:
On 8/24/12, Bernd Petrovitsch be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
You really think that there are no 32bit x86-compatible CPUs in the
embedded world?
x86-32 would be supported by long term tree until all x86-32 CPU disappear
Ahh..., so the
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:17:14 wbrana wrote:
On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen tw...@tweek.dk wrote:
Ahh..., so the development time saved by not supporting x86-32 in
mainline can
now be used by backporting new features to the forementioned long term
tree?
new features won't
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:24:16 Chris Friesen wrote:
On 08/24/2012 10:14 AM, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
(And I'm still not sure why one would run 32-bit applications on a 64-bit
architecture...)
There are several architectures (powerpc comes to mind) where 32-bit
userspace on 64-bit
On Friday 24 August 2012 19:05:53 wbrana wrote:
On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen tw...@tweek.dk wrote:
What I'd hate even more is rendering my old working hardware useless by
removing x86-32 support from the kernel. To reason the removal by saying
Microsoft plans to do it just makes me go
On Friday 24 August 2012 20:18:49 wbrana wrote:
On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen tw...@tweek.dk wrote:
That's right, but new hardware, that I wish to use with the old machines
might
not because of no backporting of new drivers. Same goes for new software
utilising newer kernel features
On Friday 24 August 2012 20:59:33 wbrana wrote:
On 8/24/12, Martin Nybo Andersen tw...@tweek.dk wrote:
I want to use *my* old machines (hey, I payed for them) on whatever new
hardware I can plug into them. I'm not an oracle and can't see into the
future, however USB has evolved
pend their time supporting X32
> instead of x86-32 or support x86-64 only as 99% of users will be able
> to run x86-64 software if x86-32 will be dropped
> - wouldn't be dropped this year, but there should be plan when it will
> be dropped e.g. when Windows 9 will be released
>
> On 8/2
X32
instead of x86-32 or support x86-64 only as 99% of users will be able
to run x86-64 software if x86-32 will be dropped
- wouldn't be dropped this year, but there should be plan when it will
be dropped e.g. when Windows 9 will be released
On 8/23/12, Martin Nybo Andersen tw...@tweek.dk
20 matches
Mail list logo
