Martins Krikis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do realize that Intel should have asked a long time ago for it
> to be considered for acceptance (I did ask back in October for
> 2.4.28).
Sorry about all the noise, but I just remembered some other important
aspects that played a ro
and if substantial amount of users will benefit from it."
So here is a "new driver" (that's been around for a while)
which I don't think can break anything. As to the "substantial
amount of users", the two SourceForge releases with download
statistics have each seen about 800 do
)
which I don't think can break anything. As to the substantial
amount of users, the two SourceForge releases with download
statistics have each seen about 800 downloads, I have no idea
whether that counts as substantial.
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
Martins Krikis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do realize that Intel should have asked a long time ago for it
to be considered for acceptance (I did ask back in October for
2.4.28).
Sorry about all the noise, but I just remembered some other important
aspects that played a role here.
Intel
are available and the regular IDE driver
has picked them up already).
Signed-off-by: Martins Krikis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.4.29/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-01-25 20:55:41.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.4.29-iswraid/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-02-01
20:23:51.0 -0500
@@ -
are available and the regular IDE driver
has picked them up already).
Signed-off-by: Martins Krikis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.4.29/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-01-25 20:55:41.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.4.29-iswraid/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-02-01
20:23:51.0 -0500
@@ -3597,7
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martins Krikis wrote:
> > Without this patch, if the BIOS of an ICH6R box has IDE set to
> "RAID"
> > mode then ata_piix will not find any SATA disks because it
> incorrectly
> > tries the legacy mode. With t
more customizable.
* Some code cleanup and optimization.
* Documentation changes.
Please consider this driver for inclusion in the 2.4 kernel tree.
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
P.S. I've CC-d directly to the potential reviewers suggested a few months ago
egacy mode. With the patch all 4 SATA drives become visible.
I don't think it would break any other vendor's SATA, but you can be
the judge of that. If so, perhaps we can restrict the test some more
by checking vendor/device IDs.
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
Jeff,
This fixes an occasional oops in the libata-scsi code.
Martins Krikis
--- linux-2.4.29/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2005-01-28 12:07:56.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.4.29-iswraid/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2005-01-28
12:14:43.0 -0500
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ void
Jeff,
This fixes an occasional oops in the libata-scsi code.
Martins Krikis
--- linux-2.4.29/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2005-01-28 12:07:56.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.4.29-iswraid/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2005-01-28
12:14:43.0 -0500
@@ -283,7 +283,8 @@ void
. With the patch all 4 SATA drives become visible.
I don't think it would break any other vendor's SATA, but you can be
the judge of that. If so, perhaps we can restrict the test some more
by checking vendor/device IDs.
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
--- linux
and optimization.
* Documentation changes.
Please consider this driver for inclusion in the 2.4 kernel tree.
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
P.S. I've CC-d directly to the potential reviewers suggested a few months ago
by Marcelo. I'll appreciate any
--- Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:
Without this patch, if the BIOS of an ICH6R box has IDE set to
RAID
mode then ata_piix will not find any SATA disks because it
incorrectly
tries the legacy mode. With the patch all 4 SATA drives become
visible.
I don't
--- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just curious. Is there already a possibility to use
> RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels?
I don't think so, but provided that dm supports RAID10
it should be quite easy to get there.
Martins Krikis
(not speaking for
I'll let everybody know, of course.
Thanks,
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &quo
eek I'm planning to have a new version that adds RAID10 support
for the ICH7R-based machines. Please let me know what my options
are (if any) regarding getting iswraid in 2.4.
Thanks very much,
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
_
version that adds RAID10 support
for the ICH7R-based machines. Please let me know what my options
are (if any) regarding getting iswraid in 2.4.
Thanks very much,
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
__
Do You Yahoo
,
Martins Krikis
Storage Components Division
Intel Massachusetts
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
--- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just curious. Is there already a possibility to use
RAID10 metadata in 2.6.x kernels?
I don't think so, but provided that dm supports RAID10
it should be quite easy to get there.
Martins Krikis
(not speaking for my employer
20 matches
Mail list logo
