> > If it does not increase memory usage, then possibly:
> >
> > __register_chrdev_region(major, 0, (~0U) & MINORMASK, name);
> > or (1< clear
> >
> >
>
> I'm more worried about something in the chardev bowels not supporting
> >8bit minors well.
>
I was
> We are making a very complicated problem
> out of nothing. This hasn't caused any problems
> in the past, and changing the existing names and
> minors will cause problems for everyone today.
>
> Just leave it alone, fix up the documentation,
> and have the driver print some warning if it
>
We are making a very complicated problem
out of nothing. This hasn't caused any problems
in the past, and changing the existing names and
minors will cause problems for everyone today.
Just leave it alone, fix up the documentation,
and have the driver print some warning if it
allocates
>
> Mathiasen, Torben wrote:
>
> > Assuming QE has 4 entries, I would expect CPM to be the same. But we
> > need verification of that. If it needs 6, we are in more trouble.
>
> The QE can have up to 8, actually, but I'm willing to limit the driver
> to 4.
Its yo
> Mathiasen, Torben wrote:
> >
> > Got around looking at this one. I'm fine with this approach, but the
> > CPM5 fix looks wrong. Shouldn't it be:
> >
> > 49 = /dev/ttyCPM3 PPC CPM (SCC or SMC) - port 3
> >
> > instead?
> >
>
> W
> --- devices-2.6+.txt 2007-02-22 13:37:18.0 -0600
> +++ devices-2.6+.new 2007-02-22 13:42:50.0 -0600
> @@ -2770,7 +2770,10 @@
>45 = /dev/ttyMM1 Marvell MPSC - port 1
>46 = /dev/ttyCPM0 PPC CPM (SCC or SMC) -
port 0
>
--- devices-2.6+.txt 2007-02-22 13:37:18.0 -0600
+++ devices-2.6+.new 2007-02-22 13:42:50.0 -0600
@@ -2770,7 +2770,10 @@
45 = /dev/ttyMM1 Marvell MPSC - port 1
46 = /dev/ttyCPM0 PPC CPM (SCC or SMC) -
port 0
Mathiasen, Torben wrote:
Got around looking at this one. I'm fine with this approach, but the
CPM5 fix looks wrong. Shouldn't it be:
49 = /dev/ttyCPM3 PPC CPM (SCC or SMC) - port 3
instead?
Well, how many CPM devices can exist? If there are really 6 ports
possible
Mathiasen, Torben wrote:
Assuming QE has 4 entries, I would expect CPM to be the same. But we
need verification of that. If it needs 6, we are in more trouble.
The QE can have up to 8, actually, but I'm willing to limit the driver
to 4.
Its your choice if you want to limit it to 4
> On Dec 1 2006 11:30, Torben Mathiasen wrote:
> >Here's the updated version with additonal spelling fixes.
> >
> >Please use this one instead of the one that was sent 2 days ago.
>
> And here's a style update (have one free line between each,
> and a few tabs). Applies _on top_ of yours.
>
On Dec 1 2006 11:30, Torben Mathiasen wrote:
Here's the updated version with additonal spelling fixes.
Please use this one instead of the one that was sent 2 days ago.
And here's a style update (have one free line between each,
and a few tabs). Applies _on top_ of yours.
Thanks,
> > +258 block ROM/Flash read-only translation layer
> > + 0 = /dev/blockrom0First ROM card's
> translation layer interface
> > + 1 = /dev/blockrom0Second ROM card's
> translation layer interface
> ^^^
>
> Shouldn't here be '1',
+258 block ROM/Flash read-only translation layer
+ 0 = /dev/blockrom0First ROM card's
translation layer interface
+ 1 = /dev/blockrom0Second ROM card's
translation layer interface
^^^
Shouldn't here be '1', ie,
Paulo,
Thanks for the update/patch. Sorry I missed your first email, bu I've been
way too busy with other stuff the last couple of months.
There's a lot of endianess issues in the tlan driver, but none really
bothered fixing them. No one really assumed the tlan adapters would be used
on
Paulo,
Thanks for the update/patch. Sorry I missed your first email, bu I've been
way too busy with other stuff the last couple of months.
There's a lot of endianess issues in the tlan driver, but none really
bothered fixing them. No one really assumed the tlan adapters would be used
on
Its probaly due to the semaphore changes that went in to test11 by
Richard Henderson. scsi_wait_req will grab one on entry. Did test10
work for you on Alpha?
Regards,
Torben Mathiasen
> -Original Message-
> From: Rival, Frank
> Sent: 30. november 2000 21:37
> To: Ezolt, Phillip
> Cc:
Its probaly due to the semaphore changes that went in to test11 by
Richard Henderson. scsi_wait_req will grab one on entry. Did test10
work for you on Alpha?
Regards,
Torben Mathiasen
-Original Message-
From: Rival, Frank
Sent: 30. november 2000 21:37
To: Ezolt, Phillip
Cc:
17 matches
Mail list logo
