[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Bharata,
> I am developing a linux stackable/unification filesystem too.
>
> Bharata B Rao:
>
>> Questions
>> -
>>
> :::
>
>> First of all, should we even expect a sane lseek(2) on union mounted
>> directories ? If not, will the Approach 2,
Kevin K wrote:
>
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:30 PM, James Carlson wrote:
>
>> Kevin K writes:
>>> Is it possible to send raw packets via ppp under Linux?
>>>
>>> More specifically, in 2.4 series kernels such as RH's 2.4.21-47 kernel?
>>>
>>> I've trying to modify the DHCP 3.0.1 code provided with RH 3 s
Michael Poole wrote:
> Matt Keenan writes:
>
>
>> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> Err, no. Software, per legal definitions in Brazil, US and elsewhere,
>>> require some physical support. That's the hard disk in the TiVO DVR,
>>>
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>>> So, TiVo includes a copy of Linux in its DVR.
>>>
>
>
>> Stop right there.
>>
>
>
>> You seem to make the mistake to think that s
Andrew Lyon wrote:
> On 6/7/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrew Lyon wrote:
>> >
>> > Could this also cause a system to be unstable? my abit athlon64 at
>> > work will not run x64 with more than 1gb ram, and i have a colo server
>> > with supermicro & 2 x dual core xeons that wi
d then
mmap(fd,PROT_READ) => EFAULT).
I am going to give this patch a more thorough test tomorrow with ltp.
Comments, corrections, et al are welcome.
Matt
--
Matt Keenan
OpCode Solutions
Signed-off-by: Matt Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
diff -urN linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/cifs/dir.c
lin
Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>>> I feel, having a silent/transparent workaround is not a good idea.
>>> With that
>>
>> If enough RAM is chopped off users will notice. They tend to complain
>> when they miss RAM. I don't like panic very much because for many
>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved
motherboard resources.
Please fix the formatting of your code.
[snip snip]
Same goes for this thing:
+ if((pci_probe &
young dave wrote:
Hi,
Given what you said above, I don't see gcc, on its best day, will ever
know enough to validate that that variable is indeed always initialized.
So I would vote for silencing it on those grounds.
I agree too. How about this one:
diff -dur linux/fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c linux.
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Ray Lee wrote:
On 5/19/07, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I generated a table of results from the latest glitch1 script, using an
HTML postprocessor I not *quite* ready to foist on the word. In any
case
it has some numbers for frames per second, fairness of the
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:26:42 +0100 "Bradley Chapman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, all I want to know is whether or not enabling
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G for a laptop that has exactly 1GB of RAM will result
in any performance degradation.
On Mon, Apr 30,
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 3/27/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>
>> And why did the mouse numbers all get rearranged in 2.6.20, e.g.
>> mouse1 became mouse2 for many people?
>
> Input devices are not guaranteed to be stable.
>
So people with z-axis mice need
Andrew Morton wrote:
(cc restored. Please always do reply-to-all).
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:35:07 + Matt Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:15:25PM +0100, Zoltan Menyhart wrote:
I had a look at copy_one_pte().
I
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:15:25PM +0100, Zoltan Menyhart wrote:
I had a look at copy_one_pte().
I cannot see any ioproc_update_page() call, not even for the COW pages.
Is it intentional?
There is no such thing as ioproc_update_page in any mainline tree.
You mu
Sorry for the spam, but this petition has a time limit on it. It is a
petition only for UK citizens and UK residents to the PM. The PM has
actually acted on some of these petitions in the past, whether he will
move on this one is another matter. If you feel that software patents
are bad and you
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 9/8/05, Eric Piel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
09/08/2005 04:38 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote/a écrit:
On 9/8/05, Christoph Litters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have an adapter usb to psx i have tried it with 2.6.9 and it works
perfectly with the ke
16 matches
Mail list logo
