Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

2008-02-05 Thread Matteo Tescione
On 5-02-2008 14:38, "FUJITA Tomonori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100 > Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> James Bottomley schrieb: >> >>> These are both features being independently worked on, are they not? >>> Even if they weren't, the

Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

2008-02-05 Thread Matteo Tescione
On 5-02-2008 14:38, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100 Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Bottomley schrieb: These are both features being independently worked on, are they not? Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of

Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

2008-02-04 Thread Matteo Tescione
, the answer is iSCSI. And now, SCST is the best open-source iSCSI target. So, from an end-user point of view, what are the really problems to not integrate scst in the mainstream kernel? Just my two cent, -- So long and thank for all the fish -- #Matteo Tescione #RMnet srl > > > On Mon, 4

Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel

2008-02-04 Thread Matteo Tescione
, the answer is iSCSI. And now, SCST is the best open-source iSCSI target. So, from an end-user point of view, what are the really problems to not integrate scst in the mainstream kernel? Just my two cent, -- So long and thank for all the fish -- #Matteo Tescione #RMnet srl On Mon, 4 Feb 2008